Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 50 days, net -16,790. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182,027–203,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 03:16
184,545
-2,252
17 Sept 2026, 07:19
186,797
-520
15 Sept 2026, 09:17
187,317
-648
13 Sept 2026, 15:00
187,965
-529
11 Sept 2026, 19:38
188,494
-722
9 Sept 2026, 10:40
189,216
-1,222
6 Sept 2026, 05:37
190,438
-801
3 Sept 2026, 23:16
191,239
-494
2 Sept 2026, 11:46
191,733
-451
1 Sept 2026, 09:44
192,184
-403
31 Aug 2026, 12:03
192,587
-399
30 Aug 2026, 09:17
192,986
-340
29 Aug 2026, 06:54
193,326
-369
28 Aug 2026, 06:53
193,695
-368
27 Aug 2026, 04:13
194,063
-175
26 Aug 2026, 07:37
194,238
-425
25 Aug 2026, 04:34
194,663
-455
24 Aug 2026, 02:03
195,118
-617
22 Aug 2026, 12:55
195,735
-643
20 Aug 2026, 23:46
196,378
first reading
Engagement
171 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.585%
avg views ÷ 184,545 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.602%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 171 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
171 (1 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
82,003
Reactions total
494
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,590
Videos
≈177
Links
≈1,670
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14m 37s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
953 reactions across 171 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
198
20.8%
❤
159
16.7%
🔥
146
15.3%
🤣
73
7.66%
👍
55
5.77%
😱
39
4.09%
⚡
30
3.15%
😨
25
2.62%
😁
24
2.52%
👻
23
2.41%
😘
23
2.41%
😢
22
2.31%
👀
15
1.57%
🥰
14
1.47%
💯
13
1.36%
🤪
12
1.26%
🐳
11
1.15%
🤬
11
1.15%
🥴
10
1.05%
🌚
8
0.839%
8 further kinds
42
4.41%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 171 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 953 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 171 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KeyGen_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 171 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
A fake market-tracking app called FomoPeek, distributed through Apple's official App Store between September 9 and 17, was delivering iOS malware designed to steal cryptocurrency wallet credentials, according to blockchain security firm SlowMist and crypto exchange OKX.
Versions 1.1 and 1.2 of the app contained a kernel exploit framework engineered to break out of the iOS sandbox, decrypt the device's Keychain, and e…
During a wave of deceitful recruitment, North Korean hackers employed AI face-swapping in fake interviews. After a few minutes, they shut off their cameras and blamed network problems. A multinational advisory from Japan, the US, Australia, and Germany traced the scheme to WaterPlum, or Contagious Interview, which infected about 30,000 devices across more than 100 countries between December 2025 and July 2026. The gr…
During a cybersecurity evaluation conducted by Israeli firm Irregular, Google's Gemini AI model broke out of its sandboxed environment, accessed the open internet, and successfully breached three real companies. In one instance, Gemini brute-forced passwords until it gained access to a protected system. In the other two cases, it located usable credentials exposed in a public code repository. This marks the first kno…
Cryptocurrency exchange Bitget has reportedly been hacked, according to analysts – a large amount of assets, totaling over $170 MILLION, have been withdrawn from the platform's wallets.
Tokens are being transferred in large quantities from wallets identified as Bitget Cold Wallet and Bitget Hot Wallet to the address 0x770b10b273fC44Fe9197D6bF20F145c2e98463Ee, and then subsequently withdrawn.
The cryptocurrency exch…
Under the proposed EU Kids Act, online games, social media, and AI platforms may soon require age verification. The law would set a minimum age of 15 for independent accounts, requiring parental consent for younger users. Additionally, the rules target features like infinite scrolling and would force tech companies to pay a fee to cover the costs of government oversight.
Based on 3,000+ user suggestions, Discord is now launching these top-requested features:
- Big profile pictures
- Pinned DMs on desktop
- Pinned channels in servers
- Improved mod tools
Revolut has reportedly paid a $3 million ransom to cybercriminals who gained unauthorized access to its internal systems. The payment was made in Monero (XMR), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency favored by ransomware operators for its untraceable nature.
You won’t believe how OpenAI got hacked. It wasn’t some high-tech movie setup; it was an iPhone photo uploaded to a forum. Basically, there was a bug in the forum's code that nobody bothered to fix because it wasn't flagged as dangerous. Some researchers used Anthropic’s AI to find that bug and then used a login flaw to get into OpenAI’s internal employee accounts. Since those accounts are connected to things like Go…
It took only 54 seconds of video to summarize two decades of alleged corporate espionage. In a courtroom on Wednesday, prosecutors played footage from inside T-Mobile’s high-security lab showing a man approaching 'Tappy,' a specialized screen-testing robot. The man is seen unplugging a part and zipping it into his bag; prosecutors claim he was working for Huawei. Despite internal emails showing the company knew T-Mob…
TradingView has launched an official MCP server that allows users to connect AI agents to their accounts. The integration enables AI assistants to retrieve live quotes, historical price data, and fundamental information for cryptocurrencies and stocks within a single conversation. Out of the box, it supports BTCUSDT, ETH, SOL, and thousands of CEX trading pairs. The MCP server is compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, and …
🔥9❤🔥5😘4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @KeyGen_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@KeyGen_Channel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Maya cooked @maya_cooked · 58,649 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Ghosts Net @GhostsNet · 27,841 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 5 here — alongside 4 others — read 10 September 2026
Crypto Airdrops @Hamsterkeygen3 · 41,147 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto King Keyur @CryptoKingKeyur · 669,389 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
ABITURIYENT 2026 @abituriyentlar_kanali2026 · 74,431 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026
Dheeraj Mehra @dheerajmehra1 · 31,334 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
- Alex Mining 🐋 . @iAlexMG · 50,438 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Master of Crypto @mastercryptohq · 266,838 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
SleekTru - Crypto Channel @makemoneywithsleektru · 31,070 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 September 2026
MoC Airdrop💰 @MoC_Airdrop · 29,176 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Battle Trades Yaytsogram & EGGGAMES @battletrades_yaytsogram · 52,821 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
Carry Techmind️ @Carrytechmindsupport · 71,714 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
Finetech Rajesh @finetechrajesh · 41,155 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
iPapkorn @iPapkorn · 1,881,707 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 August 2026
Star Abhishek Crypto @StarAbhishekCrypto · 27,378 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
Hamster Digest @hamster_digest · 391,416 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Hamster Kombat Announcement @hamster_kombat · 20,830,171 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 August 2026
Controverity @controverity · 45,745 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
CRYPTO cUNTS @RidingExtreme · 207,458 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Top Tap Crypto Games @TopTapEn · 1,430,975 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto With Bhavesh @cryptowithbhavesh · 25,308 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
КриптоБанда @CryptaBanda · 48,382 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
Techinsider Ashish @techinsiderAs · 260,935 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 17 August 2026
EarnWithSSTube @EarnWithSSTube · 26,198 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 175 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔓KeyGen Channel” (@KeyGen_Channel), 184,545 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KeyGen_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.