🏳️For allegedly financing a terrorist organization via Telegram "Stars," Ilya Pylaev has been detained in Nizhny Tagil. He is accused of transferring 1148 rubles 29 kopecks through paid reactions on various posts, an act deemed "Assistance to terrorist activity in the form of financing" under Part 1.1 of Article 205.1 of the Russian Criminal Code. Pylaev will remain in a pre-trial detention center for two months, unt…

Channel
🔓KeyGen Channel
@KeyGen_Channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
199,308subscribers
-2,027 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002148723094 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KeyGen_Channel |
| Description | Contacts: @KeyGen_KeyGen @MrNasN Wallet: keygen-keygen.ton |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KeyGen_Channel |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 199,308 | -443 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 199,751 | -493 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 200,244 | -391 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 200,635 | -328 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 200,963 | -372 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 201,335 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.44%
- avg views ÷ 199,308 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 878
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.557%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 37
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32,484 |
| Reactions total | 181 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,480
- Videos
- ≈165
- Links
- ≈1,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 9m 26s
- Average length
- 1m 21s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
181 reactions across 36 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 42 | 23.2% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 12.7% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 9.94% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 9.94% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 5.52% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 4.97% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 3.31% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 2.76% | |
| 😨 | 5 | 2.76% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.21% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.21% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 37 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KeyGen_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
📹 AI has produced its first full-length movie! Hell Grind, created entirely by Higgsfield AI, premiered at the Cannes market, a true shift in content creation. The creators have openly shared all prompts and assets for free, allowing anyone to learn AI filmmaking. 📹 Find the full movie on YouTube.
❤🔥5🔥2🥰1
🤑The Bitcoin address associated with the Coldcard thief has evolved into an unexpected public forum. Since the theft, the address has received a flood of messages from a wide range of senders — each with their own agenda. Several messages offer professional services. One user advertises BTC laundering with KYC bypass, charging a 10% commission. Others take a more desperate tone, with pleas like "Return 80% of my 5 BT…
😨2❤🔥1
🇺🇸The United States is currently weighing a potential ban on Chinese open-source AI models. According to a report referenced by the South China Morning Post, such a measure could cost American businesses up to $12 billion annually. The proposed policy, reportedly under review in Washington, would directly impact U.S. companies relying on foreign AI models. This move fits into a broader pattern of U.S.-China tech rest…
🤣2❤🔥1
🌟 According to leading report, scientists have concluded that the only viable path to saving Earth is to reduce the global population by half — from 8 billion to 4 billion people.
❤🔥3🤣3👌2🔥2
🎥YouTube has taken decisive action against AI-generated spam, eliminating over 130,000 channels and 50,000 coordinated spam networks in the last half-year. The platform's strategy involves automated detection, analyzing publishing patterns, content similarity, and channel behavior rather than individual video reviews.
❤🔥2⚡1👍1🔥1
🇪🇺The European Commission is taking a firm stand on AI oversight after Anthropic's Claude models breached three systems in cybersecurity tests and an OpenAI AI agent conducted an unauthorized cyberattack. Upcoming EU AI Act regulations will compel foundation model developers to submit technical documentation and training data summaries. The Commission is investigating these events to guide official actions, prioritiz…
❤🔥1👍1
🤑Over the last 12 months, silver significantly outperformed all other major assets, achieving a remarkable 55.4% gain. This placed it well ahead of WTI crude (27.7%), the Nasdaq (22.9%), gold (21.7%), and the S&P 500 (20.1%). At the other end of the spectrum, #Ethereum recorded the poorest performance, dropping 44.7%—a stark contrast of over 100 percentage points from silver's impressive rally.
❤🔥3🔥2
🎉 Neuralink, Elon Musk's company, has integrated a new function into its brain chip, enabling individuals with motor disabilities to operate electric wheelchairs purely through brain signals. This significant development allows users to move and direct a wheelchair just by thinking, entirely bypassing the need for hands or traditional control devices, thereby greatly boosting their autonomy.
❤🔥2
🇫🇷Two crypto millionaires in France suffered a 52-hour ordeal of kidnapping and torture, which included beatings and burns, leading to a forced transfer of $30,000 in cryptocurrency. A $150,000 ransom was also demanded. Police intervention led to a chase and the conviction of six culprits. This case is part of a larger pattern, with over 50 violent attacks on crypto owners reported in H1 2026, making France a focal p…
👍2❤🔥1😨1
🇺🇸 An FBI agent has been apprehended after illicitly accessing a target's cryptocurrency wallet with classified FBI instruments, draining it of $1 million. The agent was reportedly caught after discussing his actions with fellow colleagues.
👍1😁1
⛵️ Leveraging advanced AI to analyze 80 million historical Spanish colonial documents, AE Studio is on the hunt for a skilled "pirate" to locate and recover sunken treasures. The role, which necessitates professional diving certification and seafaring experience for high-risk operations, offers a salary range of $50,000 to $500,000 annually, plus a share of the bounty. Despite AI's precision in finding wrecks, human …
👍2❤1❤🔥1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @KeyGen_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@KeyGen_Channel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,065,963 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hamster_kombat · 22,116,787#1
@hamster_digest · 419,955#2
@maya_cooked · 62,901#3
@CryptoKingKeyur · 721,535#4
@realgoats_channel · 5,057,045#5
@odes_ai · 371,109 (as read 11 August 2026)#6
@mastercryptohq · 278,412#7
@mediarussia · 1,259,054#8
@TheFootballCity · 286,094#9
@RidingExtreme · 219,618#10
@iAlexMG · 53,955#11
@moneygurudigi · 82,108#12
@vestirussia · 1,050,010#13
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 147,053#14
@MoC_Airdrop · 30,698#15
@deckforge_official · 2,212,185#16
@autoruss · 883,982#17
@hayzonn · 3,054,973#18
@shubhratewari · 11,960#19
@TaskNChannel · 972,173#20
@Aboel3bakra · 37,964#21
@DaCoinHunter · 4,955#22
@dogs · 7,510,360#23
@blumcrypto · 15,640,039#24
@tomarket_ai · 7,240,974#25
@Cats_housewtf · 8,671,507#26
@notcoin · 9,200,677#27
@theyescoin · 6,198,907#28
@rockyrabbitio · 3,705,209#29
@catapult_extreme · 9,238,991#30
@banana_update · 1,478,718#31
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,307,721#32
@tapswapai · 10,939,107#33
@iamalexfalcon · 3,333,265#34
@hotonnear · 4,947,595#35
@seedupdates · 8,928,757#36
@fx_holding_community · 6,579,954#37
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,902,589#38
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,671,792#39
@gram · 7,033,222#40
@tonkeeper_news · 5,073,539#41
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,727,957#42
@pigscrew · 2,280,931#43
@boomloudcoin · 1,758,838#44
@dotcoincommunity · 4,251,361#45
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,300,009#46
@token_1win · 3,169,397#47
@theTapCoins · 3,124,024#48
@trendingapps · 4,012,931#49
@gameechannel · 2,002,345#50
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,351,236#51
@builders · 3,590,321#52
@battle_games_com · 2,877,501#53
@babydogecoin · 1,078,062#54
@onus_globalchannel · 1,758,574#55
@money · 3,274,381#56
@watbird · 1,559,940#57
@tonstationgames · 3,410,346#58
@hexnio · 2,116,237#59
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,659,802#60
@coincoinai · 1,909,738#61
@CryptoPlusAr · 17,056#62
@MarketNitro_1 · 4,766#63
@therealyescoin · 2,207,523#64
@nuntx · 21,148#65
@catgoldminerann · 962,969#66
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,328,455#67
@corn_battles · 1,099,146#68
@tons_base · 513,327#69
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,267,195#70
@Cryptoo_Fy · 9,989#71
@metazoneofficial · 593,107#72
@crypto_jeman · 698,934#73
@the_vertus · 2,261,866#74
@catizenann · 3,808,247#75
@monorixofficial · 1,422,621#76
@CherryTrendingEVM · 929,411#77
@next10xgem1 · 340,499#78
@cherrytrending · 460,885#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptoKingKeyur · 721,535
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
@mastercryptohq · 278,412
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@iPapkorn · 1,938,735
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 August 2026
@hamster_digest · 419,955
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@hamster_kombat · 22,116,787
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 August 2026
@RidingExtreme · 219,618
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@TopTapEn · 1,562,399
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@fastwin_app · 325,811
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 10 August 2026
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 147,053
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@vjplusbott_saveoffbot · 248,597
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 August 2026
@TheFootballCity · 286,094
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@TrueCaller_Z · 2,076,923
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 August 2026
@TelegramTipsAR · 1,640,132
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 August 2026
@SSC_CGL_GD_quiz_gk_current_upsc · 175,496
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
@cryptofam_eng · 622,299
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@rockyrabbitio · 3,705,209
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 August 2026
@dogs · 7,510,360
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 August 2026
@tomarket_ai · 7,240,974
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 August 2026
@ElonCryptoAirdrops · 153,095
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@banana_update · 1,478,718
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@Cats_housewtf · 8,671,507
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 August 2026
@hrumfam · 3,412,887
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 August 2026
@tapswapai · 10,939,107
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 August 2026
@tonkeeper_news · 5,073,539
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 August 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔓KeyGen Channel” (@KeyGen_Channel), 199,308 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KeyGen_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.