Я думаю, що роль піхоти трохи перебільшена. Про неї багато говорять, але по факту назвати якісь реальні кейси її реалізації мало хто може. (с) єкс-міністр KPI оборони Михайло Федоров
😁94🥴23👍7👎4

Channel
@cringedepartment
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,173subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001483636896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cringedepartment |
| Description | Політичний постмодерн |
| Created | 20 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cringedepartment |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 5,173 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 5,173 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (15 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 38,490 |
| Reactions total | 619 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,875 reactions across 19 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 496 | 26.5% | |
| 😁 | 341 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 267 | 14.2% | |
| 🥴 | 110 | 5.87% | |
| 💯 | 109 | 5.81% | |
| 🥰 | 88 | 4.69% | |
| 👎 | 86 | 4.59% | |
| 🤣 | 75 | 4.00% | |
| 🌭 | 58 | 3.09% | |
| 🤝 | 51 | 2.72% | |
| ❤🔥 | 40 | 2.13% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 1.65% | |
| 🌚 | 26 | 1.39% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 1.17% | |
| 😢 | 19 | 1.01% | |
| 🤔 | 19 | 1.01% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 0.853% | |
| 🤨 | 5 | 0.267% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.213% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.16% | |
| 5 further kinds | 9 | 0.48% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,875reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я думаю, що роль піхоти трохи перебільшена. Про неї багато говорять, але по факту назвати якісь реальні кейси її реалізації мало хто може. (с) єкс-міністр KPI оборони Михайло Федоров
😁94🥴23👍7👎4
Багато пишуть та говорять про Федорова, про візії, концепції, політичні амбіції. Насправді єдине питання яке йому варто задавати – які цілі війни? Так само, як це питання треба задавати й президенту. І вже потім, маючи відповідь, будувати візії, концепції. І тоді буде простіше вести мобілізаційну політику. Головна проблема сучасності – відсутність цілей. Маючи протиріччя, які виходять в збройні протистояння, учасник…
👍53❤13😁13💯7👎2🤔1
Добро пожаловать, снова.
👍35🤣9❤8👎2💯1
КПРФ сообщила о гибели секретаря белгородского горкома Александра Логвинова при ударе дрона. Депутат Госдумы от КПРФ Сергей Гаврилов заявил, что беспилотник 21 июля атаковал автомобиль Логвинова на автозаправке «Лукойл» в Белгороде. По его словам, мужчина получил смертельные ранения и погиб на месте. Українські військові вбивають комуністів у Білгороді. Речення, яке можна прочитати як в 1918 році, так і в сьогоденні…
🥰88❤🔥32😁21⚡12🥴3❤2
Як казав Вайтрекс, час прискорюється, а місць в ЗСУ для вибору зменшується. Про що це говорить?...
❤28👍19🥴15😁4🌚3🌭1
Головна причина перестановок в тому, що президент хоче рішення та план там, де він їх має надавати сам. І поки він цього не дійде, зміни будуть постійні
💯101🌭7😢4🌚2😈2😱2🥴1
Україна дуже потребує військових, тому ми більше не будемо приймати українських чоловіків, які підлягають мобілізації, — Урсула фон дер Ляєн Рубрика "а я казав". Головне зробити перший крок
👍48😁23🥴16❤7❤🔥1🎉1👎1
Наш Телеграм-інтернаціонал за участі Yigal Levin, In Factum, СПЖ «Водограй» і First Division оголошує збір ваших грошей на потреби танкістів нашого старого друга Шоушенка і друзів спецпризначенців з підрозділу Kraken. Хлопцям потрібно відремонтувати авто та закупити спорядження і засоби зв'язку. Чим швидше закриємо збір, тим краще. Закликаємо вас доєднатися та поширити. З нас як завжди звіт. ПОСИЛАННЯ НА БАНКУ МОНО…
🙏13❤5🤣5👍4
Славні нащадки характерників, козаків, воїнів визвольних змагань, полякоборці за спаплюжену честь славетних воїнів УПА. Гарно було б, якби вони змінили хлопців з СП «Безнадьога», котрі сидять там вже 170 діб.
👍76🥴25😢15🤣9🤨5🔥4🍾3👎3
Памʼятаєте такого російського агента в латвійській політиці на прізвище Росліков? Не так давно він організував зйоб в Мінськ, але його партія «Стабільність» досі функціонує в Латвії, а він все обіцяє що ось-ось кривавому латишському режиму прийде кінець, русские соотечественники мы вас освободим В підсумку один з невідомих укр військових Микол з тих хто перебуває в Балтії вирішив накидати хуїв в комментарях Росліков…
😁52👍12🌚3❤2
"Тому шо треба не всякой хуйньой заніматься, а жити інтєрєсно: читати НСД, бути розвідником, дресірувать любімого військовополоненого, і ходить в Белгород з красівими ночніками, получать удовольствіє."
🤝50❤23⚡5👎3🙏3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍40❤21❤🔥7🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cringedepartment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 355,860 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✙Над пропастью кринжи✙” (@cringedepartment), 5,173 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cringedepartment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.