Ну таке гріх не викласти... Ураження/знищення літаків «А-50», «Ту-95», «Ту-22», «Ту-160», «Ан-12» та «Іл-78».
👍3🍌2🔥2🌭1

Channel
@killrusians
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001983420235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @killrusians |
| Description | Канал, який показує війну, а особливо втрати росіян. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/killrusians |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 58 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 58 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
151 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 42 | 27.8% | |
| 🍌 | 36 | 23.8% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5386579156068738740 | 19 | 12.6% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 3.31% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 2.65% | |
| 🎃 | 3 | 1.99% | |
| 🎄 | 3 | 1.99% | |
| custom 5280541249663673809 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.662% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2024 to 4 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну таке гріх не викласти... Ураження/знищення літаків «А-50», «Ту-95», «Ту-22», «Ту-160», «Ан-12» та «Іл-78».
👍3🍌2🔥2🌭1
🗡➡️Як багато військової техніки залишилося на московських базах зберігання? Завдяки супутниковим знімкам, зробленим на початок 2025 року, ми зможемо з вами дослідити: які, скільки та наскільки виснажені московські бази зберігання військової техніки. Який стан справ на бронетанкових ремонтних заводах, і якими є темпи відновлення? Які наслідки це може мати для окупаційних військ москви та їхньої економіки? Відповід…
🍌2❤1
Well well well
🍌4🔥3🎃2
Що ж настав час другого великого дослідження, цього разу — артилерія 🔫 💬 Новою-старою колаборацією Resurgam, Військовий Віщун, Mortis Aeterna та Болгарин підготували об’ємне дослідження на основі супутникових знімків про стан ворожої артилерії та її перспективи. У дослідженні ми охопили наступні пункти: ➡️ 1. Підрахунок самохідної та причіпної артилерії станом на середину 2024 року. Класифікація самохідної артилер…
🌭3🔥2❤1🎃1👍1
Знищення російського ЗРК БУК-М2....
👍4custom 53865791560687387403🍌2🔥2
⚡️🛰️ Канібалізм БМ-21 «Град» Передивляючись супутникові знімки арсеналу в місті Іркутськ, який є однією з найбільших баз зберігання РСЗВ, ми побачили доволі цікаву картину: у верхній частині бази майже всі наявні Гради були канібалізовані, з них за останній рік були зняти направляючі, «труби». 🧮 Ви можете це побачити на відео. Ми розподілили цю частину бази на 3 зони, на яких загалом в 23 році перебувало 147 градів…
🎄3👍2custom 52805412496636738092❤1🤣1
Знищена російська сау Піон....
custom 53865791560687387406🍌3👍3🔥1
Вай бля.....
🔥6🍌3🥰2🤯1😁1😎1
💥 За даними фото та відео підтверджень було знищено чи уражено протягом червня: - 2 ЗРК «Бук М1/М2» - 2 ЗРК «Тор» - 3 ЗРК «Оса» - 4 РЛС Позначення кольорів на карті: червоний (С-300/С-400), жовтий (Бук/Тор), зелений (Оса), фіолетовий (РЛС). Також за нашими даними за період червня додатково було знищено чи пошкоджено (на картах не позначені): - 2-3 ЗРК «Бук» - 1 ЗРК «Тор» - 5 РЛС - 1-2 «Панцир С» - 8-10 «…
👍4🍌3🔥2✍1❤1😭1
Знищення російського ЗРК БУК-М2....
👍4🍌2🔥1custom 53865791560687387401
Уражений російський літак Су-57.....
🍌3👍3🔥2custom 53865791560687387402
Знищена російська РСЗВ ТОС-1А Солнцепьок....
👍4🍌3🔥2❤1custom 53865791560687387401
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @killrusians. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kill russians” (@killrusians), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/killrusians.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.