Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дмитрий Полянский 🇷🇺

Channel

Дмитрий Полянский 🇷🇺

@dpolrus_un

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,690subscribers

-382 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001231155608
TypeChannel
Username@dpolrus_un
DescriptionЛичный блог Постпреда России при ОБСЕ, в недавнем прошлом - Первого зам.Постпреда России при ООН. https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6747b689290fef0e014df59f&registryType=bloggersPermission #AE6YO
Created4 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dpolrus_un

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,69015,07614,8836 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 99 days, net -382. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,632–15,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 23:0014,690-4
10 Nov 2026, 15:0014,694+1
9 Nov 2026, 02:5614,693-8
7 Nov 2026, 18:5914,701-1
6 Nov 2026, 20:0014,702-1
5 Nov 2026, 16:1114,703-3
4 Nov 2026, 18:1914,706-6
3 Nov 2026, 21:3114,712-4
2 Nov 2026, 20:0714,716-10
1 Nov 2026, 17:4114,726-7
31 Oct 2026, 20:3714,733-7
30 Oct 2026, 19:1714,740-10
29 Oct 2026, 21:2814,750-6
28 Oct 2026, 22:0014,756-6
27 Oct 2026, 18:4714,762-6
26 Oct 2026, 20:1714,768-5
25 Oct 2026, 23:2914,773-7
24 Oct 2026, 23:3514,780+3
23 Oct 2026, 23:2814,777-15
23 Oct 2026, 00:3014,792first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.37%
avg views ÷ 14,690 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held48 (9 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total31,385
Reactions total1,361
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 19:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈471
Videos
≈446
Links
≈1,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 27m
Average length
4m 53s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,692 reactions across 48 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,37351.0%
❤55020.4%
🔥35413.2%
👏2649.81%
😱1515.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,692 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (3.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC431 views27 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Обсудил с ведущими программы "Время покажет" на Первом канале переговорные "метания" европейцев

👍20❤4😱2🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC709 views58 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEPhoto

🇷🇺 Д.А.Полянский: Поэтому неудивительно, что Европа осталась за скобками переговоров в Абу-Даби, на которых обсуждались вопросы европейской безопасности. Этот сценарий в Брюсселе, Лондоне, Париже, Берлине и Варшаве заслужили в полной мере. Свою приверженность миру Европе надо доказать, помня при этом, что ни на какие «передышки» или «перемирия», призванные дать Киеву время на перевооружение, Россия не пойдет. 📄 Чита…

👍40❤10🔥7😱1

12 Nov 2026, 17:40 UTC714 views44 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEPhoto

🎙Выступление Постоянного представителя Российской Федерации Д.А.Полянского на заседании Постоянного совета ОБСЕ 12 ноября 2026 года «О продолжающейся “гибридной войне”, развязанной НАТО и ЕС против России» 📄 Выступление полностью 💬 Ответное слово 🇷🇺🇺🇸 Российско-американские переговоры в Абу-Даби. В фокусе внимания - кризис архитектуры европейской безопасности. При этом европейцы, которых в ОАЭ никто не приглашал, …

👍24❤13🔥6😱1

12 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC708 views43 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEVideo

❗Постоянный представитель России при ОБСЕ Д.А.Полянский о заседании Постоянного совета 12 ноября 2026 г. 📍Австрия, Вена

👍27👏9🔥4❤2😱1

11 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC993 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Вместе с М. С. Григорьевым (@grigoriev_maxim) проводим важное мероприятие по развенчанию одного из ключевых "столпов" западной антироссийской пропаганды последних лет - фальсификации в Буче: https://t.me/RusMissionOSCE/8763 Поскольку доказывать что-то надо в основном западной аудитории, оно пройдет на английском языке без перевода, позднее разместим версию с субтитрами на наших каналах. Если кому-то интересно, по…

👍37❤7🔥6😱1

10 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC966 views56 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEVideo

🎙Постоянный представитель Российской Федерации при ОБСЕ Д.А.Полянский принял участие в ток-шоу "Открытый эфир" на телеканале Звезда и прокомментировал затронутую на прошедших 21 октября на площадке Постпредства "Венских дискуссиях" проблематику нарушений прав человека на Украине. 📍Австрия, Вена #Полянский #ПолянскийОБСЕ #ДмитрийПолянский #Венские_дискуссии

👍34❤9👏6🔥6😱1

8 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,220 views56 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEVideo

🎙Компиляция ключевых тезисов выступлений спикеров третьей сессии «Венских дискуссий» (21 октября 2026 года) 📄Тема сессии: Противодействие героизации нацистов и их пособников, неонацизму, шовинизму и агрессивному национализму, дискриминация нацменьшинств. 📍 Вена, Австрия

👍32❤13👏9🔥1😱1

5 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,490 views56 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEVideo

❗ Постоянный представитель России при ОБСЕ Д.А.Полянский дал комментарий австрийскому журналисту Д.Райнишу на полях прошедшей Минской международной конференции по евразийской безопасности (3-4 ноября 2026 года). 📍Минск, Беларусь

👍33❤16👏4🔥2😱1

4 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,430 views54 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @MID_RussiaPhoto

📆 3 ноября «на полях» IV Минской международной конференции по евразийской безопасности Министр иностранных дел Российской Федерации С.В.Лавров провёл встречу с Генеральным секретарём ОБСЕ Ф.Синирлиоглу. Стороны обменялись мнениями о положении дел в ОБСЕ.

👍36❤9👏6😱2🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,240 views45 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEVideo

🎙Компиляция ключевых тезисов выступлений спикеров первой сессии «Венских дискуссий» (21 октября 2026 года) 📄Тема сессии: Защита прав и законных интересов несовершеннолетних. 📍 Вена, Австрия

👍29👏8🔥6❤1😱1

2 Nov 2026, 18:14 UTC≈1,220 views58 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEPhoto

🇷🇺Д.А.Полянский: НАТО провело серию учений в непосредственной близости от российских границ, которые невозможно объяснить «оборонительными» задачами. 📄 Читайте полностью 📍Австрия, Вена

👍31😱18❤6🔥3

1 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC≈1,250 views63 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @RusMissionOSCEPhoto

🇷🇺 Д.А.Полянский: Абсурдные обвинения продолжают выдвигать и во Франции, где, как мы помним, ряд СМИ утверждал, что беспорядки координируются через российский мессенджер Макс, который подавляющее число европейцев не могут установить без российских сим-карт. 📄 Читайте полностью 📍Австрия, Вена

👍47🔥9👏4❤2😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @dpolrus_un. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дмитрий Полянский 🇷🇺” (@dpolrus_un), 14,690 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dpolrus_un.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.