Мир глазами статистики: свежие новости, экономика, политика, общество. Всё самое интересное, важное и актуальное
Наш Дзен, там тоже интересно:
zen.yandex.ru/pstat
@randomStat главный
Партнёры @pravku
Created
16 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 171 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net +369. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,399–33,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 23:06
33,060
-18
8 Nov 2026, 15:21
33,078
+20
7 Nov 2026, 11:45
33,058
-4
6 Nov 2026, 11:16
33,062
+7
5 Nov 2026, 08:04
33,055
-3
4 Nov 2026, 05:00
33,058
-4
3 Nov 2026, 04:39
33,062
-19
2 Nov 2026, 06:36
33,081
-4
1 Nov 2026, 07:57
33,085
-28
31 Oct 2026, 08:28
33,113
-46
30 Oct 2026, 07:34
33,159
-64
29 Oct 2026, 08:55
33,223
-160
28 Oct 2026, 07:54
33,383
-13
27 Oct 2026, 11:17
33,396
+2
26 Oct 2026, 13:27
33,394
-14
25 Oct 2026, 16:10
33,408
-13
24 Oct 2026, 17:36
33,421
-20
23 Oct 2026, 21:09
33,441
-3
22 Oct 2026, 21:01
33,444
+3
21 Oct 2026, 18:00
33,441
first reading
Engagement
172 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.0%
avg views ÷ 33,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,500
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.397%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
172 (22 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
653,874
Reactions total
2,597
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,830
Videos
≈1
Links
≈1,620
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
10,636 reactions across 171 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,439
32.3%
❤
1,469
13.8%
🤣
1,020
9.59%
🕊
955
8.98%
😱
885
8.32%
😢
771
7.25%
🤯
698
6.56%
🔥
585
5.50%
💩
170
1.60%
👎
116
1.09%
🐳
111
1.04%
🤩
98
0.921%
👏
91
0.856%
🤬
80
0.752%
🍾
75
0.705%
💯
53
0.498%
🎉
20
0.188%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,677 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 172 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pornstat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 172 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 45 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
▫️ Самые опасные и самые безопасные машины на американском рынке
Больше всего жизней в США уносит популярная и у нас (особенно у таксистов) Kia Rio: на миллион этих автомобилей в США приходится 170 смертей водителей! На миллион Nissan Versa - 164 смерти, замыкает тройку антилидеров Chrysler 300 c 132 смертями. В целом же, в топе по опасности - почти исключительно легковые машины (седаны, купе), нередко - небольшие
…
▫️ Лучшее десятилетие жизни по мнению американцев разного возраста
До 40 лучшим возрастом своей жизни американцы обычно считают свой текущий возраст: 34% опрошенных в возрасте от 18 до 29 считают, что лучше всего им жилось и будет житься в районе 20 с хвостиком; 30-44-летние на первое место ставят свои 30 с хвостиком, как и респонденты в возрасте от 45 до 64! Тут, правда, разница в числе голосов между разными вариан…
▫️ Индекс верховенства права в странах Европы
Лучше всего с соблюдением прав и законов (на основе очередного рейтинга) в странах Северной Европы: в лидерах (и европейских, и мировых) Дания, Норвегия, Финляндия и Швеция. Правда, во всех этих странах индекс верховенства права за последние пять лет снизился...
Хуже всего с соблюдением прав - в Восточной Европе: в главных антилидерах Россия (у нас же - самое сильное па…
▫️ Лучшие страны для выхода на пенсию
Лучше всего (индекс включает в себя финансы, здравоохранение и качество жизни) быть пенсионером в Норвегии, Ирландии, Нидерландах и Швейцарии. В общем же - просто в Европе: в топ-10 попала только одна не-европейская страна - Австралия
При этом часть стран Европы чудесным образом сочетают очень хороший рейтинг качества жизни пенсионеров и относительно небольшие расходы: в Польше…
▫️ Лучшие страны мира для туризма
Из 10 лучших (на основе 102 индикаторов, описывающих инфраструктуру, природные ресурсы, культуры, политику в отношении туристов и т.д.) стран мира для туризма 6 находятся в Европе: это Испания (3 строчка общемирового рейтинга), Франция, Германия, Великобритания, Швейцария и Италия
При этом в топ-3 только одна европейская страна - собственно Испания! Первое место занимает Япония, вт…
▫️ Самые длинные топонимы в мире
Самое длинное название из всех географических точек в мире носит холм в Новой Зеландии: 85 символов в английской записи! В русской записи символов чуть меньше, "всего" 83: Тауматафакатангихангакоауауотаматеатурипукакапикимаунгахоронукупокаифенуакитанатаху!
Дальше идут деревня в Уэльсе (58 символов) и озеро в США (45 символов)
▫️ Вся незаселённая земля в Европе
Если разбить всю территорию Европы (в данном прочтении: ЕС плюс Норвегия и Швейцария) на квадратики со стороной в 1 километр, то только на 43% этих квадратиков будет кто-то жить!
А 33% территории Европы заняты зонами, где эти незаселённые квадратики сливаются в одну из трёх огромных пустынных областей: 619 тысяч квадратных километров в Скандинавии (в целом ожидаемо), 409 - в пусты…
▫️ Лучшие университеты мира за пределами США
Все три главных мировых рейтинга университетов на верхушку ставят что-то британское: Оксфорд, Imperial College London или Кембридж. В разном порядке, но на первых трёх строчках чаще всего встречаются именно они (и каждый по одному разу занимает строчку номер 1)
А вот в десятке уже всё гораздо разнообразнее - и, самое главное, тут куча китайских университетов: Цинхуа, Пек…
▫️ Сколько времени уходит на поиск работы в разных странах мира
Меньше всего - в Мексике, в среднем работу там можно найти всего за 1.2 месяца! Чуть больше 2 месяцев на это уходит в США, в районе двух с половиной месяцев - в Канаде, Нидерландах, Исландии, Южной Корее, Дании и Израиле
С другой стороны рейтинга - ЮАР и ряд стран Южной Европы (Словакия, Греция, Италия), где на поиск работы нужно в среднем... Больше го…
▫️ Сколько соседей (по суше) есть у разных стран мира
Больше всего стран-соседей, с которыми есть сухопутная граница, - у нас и у Китая: по 14 штук! У Бразилии их 10, у Германии и Демократической (ха-ха) республики Конго - по 9ь
А вот у многих островных государств (и Австралии, которая аж на отдельном материке) сухопутных границ просто нет! Ожидаемо, впрочем...
▫️ Крупнейшие армии мира по разным показателям
Можно по-разному определять "размер" армии - по числу военнослужащих, техники разного рода, ещё как-то - и результаты везде будут получаться немного разные
В среднем, чаще всего в топ-3 по размеру армии попадают Китай, США и мы. Именно в таком порядке: Китай - топ-1 по численности армии, танкам и флоту, США - по авиации, а мы нигде не топ-1, зато занимаем второе место …
▫️ Как часто ходят к врачам жители разных стран мира
Средний житель Южной Кореи ходит к врачу... 18 раз в год! По 12 раз в год (каждый месяц!) посещают врачей средние жители Японии и Турции, 11 раз в год - Нидерландов, по 10 - Германии и Венгрии. Больше за 10 визитов в год нигде в мире не выходят
С другой стороны рейтинга - пёстрый набор из Мексики, Коста-Рики, Швеции и Мальты, где средний житель бывает у врача все…
👍18😱11👏4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @pornstat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Опросы и замеры @oizmedia · 21,750 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
Statist — Финансы и карьера @istatist · 42,007 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Социо @socio_news · 23,818 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 17 September 2026
ИНФОГРАФ : Экономика и финансы @infografo · 21,318 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Бизнес Факты 2.0 @facts2_0 · 32,237 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
Гаец @nomerok777 · 25,762 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
Немецкая философия @deutschephilosophiee · 27,608 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
Karfagen @karfagen_official_te · 35,304 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PORNSTAT / статистика” (@pornstat), 33,060 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pornstat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.