2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 270–272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 08:48
271
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:24
271
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 271 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
27.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held
13 (29 April 2026 – 20 July 2026)
Views total
43
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
130
Videos
21
Links
29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
167 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
49
29.3%
❤
27
16.2%
👍
19
11.4%
🔥
16
9.58%
custom 5251219349020100367
15
8.98%
custom 5364149763107201021
13
7.78%
custom 5282932064683839315
10
5.99%
❤🔥
7
4.19%
custom 5249484362621141855
4
2.40%
🤯
4
2.40%
🤔
3
1.80%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @epin_smm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 April 2026 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Там не блэт, если что
Блэт намного ниже и на второй странице...
Это вот результат последних 5 занятий вокалом (=5 недель). А хожу я почти три года (ну, с перерывами — 1,5-2)
То есть к этой песне я шла два года.
Раскачивала диапазон, бэлтила, тванговала, дышала, прыгала гортанью, простихоспади
Сегодня выяснилось, что мало кто доходил до этого уровня, потому что: попробовали 👉 не получилось 👉получилось, но захотелос…
Вот и думайте 🤪
Что цепляет россиян в рекламе:
🔣 необычная или юмористическая подача — 25%
🔣 сообщение о выгоде или акции — 23%
🔣 яркий дизайн — 12%
🔣 эмоциональный сюжет — 10%
🔣 обычные люди в кадре — 8%
🔣 известный человек или блогер — 5%
✍️ Июль печатает
Потому что июнь из жизни выпал
⏩Сдала на права — минус один пешеход, Даня!
⏩Поставила брекеты
⏩Купили автомобиль
⏩Сгоняли в Тулу
⏩Прочитала всего 14 книг
⏩Ушла из агентства
Выгорела.
Захотелось замедлиться и понять, кто я без работы бомж
Такие дела 🥰
Цифровые утехи ✨
Закончила работу над нейросетевой фотосессией для Кати. Сначала отправила её работать в степь, потом гулять по набережной, а затем размышлять о жизни в красной комнате. Насыщенная жизнь у человека.
Чтобы эта жизнь выглядела убедительно, пришлось немного пободаться с нейросетями.
С третьей попытки наконец нашла формулу, при которой удобно контролировать серию снимков. Самое долгое в этой работе — с…
Тренды-пустышки или как не надо танцевать ради лайка
Вы пришли в соцсети ради клиента.
Вам надо убедить его выбрать вас.
Не только среди прямых конкурентов, чтобы получить прибыль, но и среди косвенных, которые забивают информационный пузырь читателя под завязку.
📱 Что вы будете делать?
Свой ответ я покажу вам в танце! И если он вас не убедит, что я потрясающий специалист, тогда у меня не остаётся ничего другого...…
Если пробежаться по моему каналу, ощущение, что я просто про мемы...
Вот и оправдывайся потом, что ваще-то я серьезный специалист, а мемы — это по работе!
Просто апрель-май выдались насыщенными:
— закончить обучение по вождению (придется идти на вторую попытку вождения)
— закончить с лекциями для слушателей президентской программы "Маркетинг" КГУ (кто-то остался мне еще должен итоговый тест, уйдут без оценок!)
— зак…
В сентябре буду на берегу Баренцева моря.
А что, это не море?!
😁6👍2custom 53641497631072010211
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @epin_smm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ало, это стратегия!” (@epin_smm), 271 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epin_smm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
