Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بداية اللغوي

Channel

بداية اللغوي

@allughawi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,478subscribers

-120 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002372787480
TypeChannel
Username@allughawi
Descriptionبرنامج تأسيسي متخصص في تعليم اللغة العربية عن بُعد، وفقًا لخطة منهجية يدرس فيها الطالب أساسيات عامة علوم اللغة العربية والتذوق الأدبي على أيدي نخبة من المشايخ والأساتذة المتخصصين، وهو أحد المشروعات العلمية لمركز تميز.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/allughawi

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@allughawi/746 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC@IbnMalekAr/170515 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC1.0044 hours
@allughawi/752 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC@IbnMalekAr/171020 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC1.002.4 hours
@allughawi/805 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 12:51 UTC@IbnMalekAr/180621 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTC1.0010 minutes
@allughawi/752 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC@KhalilFiqh/195120 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC1.003.4 hours
@allughawi/805 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 12:51 UTC@KhalilFiqh/201121 Oct 2026, 14:59 UTC1.002.1 hours
@allughawi/807 · this entry23 Oct 2026, 12:59 UTC@KhalilFiqh/201424 Oct 2026, 11:59 UTC1.0023 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@IbnMalekAr7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.4 hours@IbnMalekAr (4–3)
@KhalilFiqh5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0013 hoursthis entry (4–1)
@TamayyuzCenter6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@TamayyuzCenter (5–1)
@lthtdo5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (4–1)
@AlBuhutiFiqh5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0088 minutes@AlBuhutiFiqh (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 56 comparable posts for this entry, running 19 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,4706,6006,5357 August 2026 — 6,598 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,598 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,599 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,595 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,593 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,595 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,600 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,593 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,586 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,573 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,559 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,545 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,526 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,522 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,523 subscribers30 September 2026 — 6,505 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,488 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,485 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,481 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,475 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,474 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,473 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,475 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,470 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,473 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,478 subscribers6,4787 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net -120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,451–6,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 06:286,478+5
5 Nov 2026, 17:406,473+3
2 Nov 2026, 19:206,470-5
31 Oct 2026, 00:346,475+2
27 Oct 2026, 19:416,473-1
24 Oct 2026, 23:366,474-1
22 Oct 2026, 07:486,475-6
19 Oct 2026, 09:266,481-4
16 Oct 2026, 04:356,485-3
6 Oct 2026, 21:566,488-17
30 Sept 2026, 07:376,505-18
19 Sept 2026, 17:366,523+1
15 Sept 2026, 05:396,522-4
11 Sept 2026, 22:196,526-19
7 Sept 2026, 15:396,545-14
2 Sept 2026, 07:176,559-14
30 Aug 2026, 11:576,573-13
27 Aug 2026, 01:596,586-7
24 Aug 2026, 06:556,593-7
20 Aug 2026, 08:166,600first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 6,478 subscribers
Avg views / post
812
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.664%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held56 (19 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total16,239
Reactions total104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
594
Videos
114
Links
634

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20m 19s
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

265 reactions across 47 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤21681.5%
👍3814.3%
🏆20.755%
💯20.755%
🔥20.755%
😢20.755%
👏10.377%
🤩10.377%
🥰10.377%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC255 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📚 من مظاهر الاقتصاد في العربية: المستوى الصوتي. ❓هل تساءلت يومًا لماذا تميل اللغة العربية في بعض ألفاظها إلى تخفيف النطق واختصار الجهد الصوتي؟ يُقصد بالاقتصاد اللغوي أن تؤدي اللغة وظيفتها في الإفهام بأقل جهد من مستعملها. ومن مظاهره على مستوى النظام الصوتي ما يأتي: 1️⃣ الإدغام: 🔹نحو «مَدَّ»، وأصلها «مَدَدَ»؛ إذ سُكّنت الدال الأولى بحذف حركتها، ثم أُدغمت في الدال الثانية، فصارتا حرفًا واحدًا مشددًا. 2️⃣ إبدال تاء …

6 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC468 views14 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📚 الأدب مع الله في الإعراب. قد يظهر الأدب مع الله حتى في اختيار المصطلح النحوي؛ فبعض التعبيرات اللغوية تُصاغ بما يليق بجلال الله سبحانه وتعالى، فنقول: «مبنيٌّ لما لم يُسمَّ فاعلُه» بدلًا من «مبني للمجهول»، و«لام الدعاء» بدلًا من «لام الأمر» في مواضع الدعاء. 🧭 إنها لفتات لغوية تكشف كيف يلتقي علم العربية مع تعظيم الله وحُسن الأدب في الخطاب. ❓ هل تعرف أمثلة أخرى للأدب مع الله في التعبير والإعراب؟ 💬 شاركنا بها في الت…

❤14

6 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC328 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @AlBuhutiFiqhPhoto

🧭 بوصلة الحنبلي.. خطوتك الأولى في رحلة التفقه. كيف نشأ الفقه الإسلامي؟ وكيف تشكّلت المذاهب الفقهية؟ وما الذي يميّز المذهب الحنبلي في أصوله ومنهجه؟ ومن هم المشتغلون بالفقه، وما مراتبهم وأدوارهم؟ 📚 انطلاقًا من هذه الأسئلة وغيرها مما يشغل المقبلين على دراسة الفقه. يعلن معهد الإمام البهوتي عن فتح باب التسجيل في برنامج «بوصلة الحنبلي». ✨ برنامج تأسيسي يضع بين يديك مدخلًا منهجيًّا لدراسة الفقه، يبني تصورك عن الشريعة وع…

5 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC476 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📚 ابنُ الحاجب.. لم يحجبه السلطانُ عن كلمة الحق. ✨ هو جمال الدين أبو عمرو عثمان بن عمر، المعروف بـ«ابن الحاجب». وُلد بإسنا في صعيد مصر سنة 570هـ، وكان أبوه حاجبًا لأحد أمراء صلاح الدين، فنُسب إليه. ثم صار الابن إمامًا في الفقه المالكي والنحو والصرف والأصول والقراءات. 👈 وفي سنة 638هـ سلّم الصالح إسماعيل، صاحب دمشق، حصن الشقيف للفرنج. فأنكر عليه ذلك ابن الحاجب، وكان يومئذ شيخ المالكية، ومعه سلطان العلماء العز بن عبد …

❤3

4 Nov 2026, 16:40 UTC546 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📚 النحو وحده لا يكفي. 🔎 فالنحو يضبط بناء الجملة، لكن علوم العربية تتجاوز ذلك؛ فـالصرف يكشف بنية الكلمة وتحوّلاتها، والبلاغة تكشف أسرار اختيار الأسلوب وترتيب ألفاظه، والدلالة تبحث في الفروق الدقيقة بين المعاني، والأدب يعرّفك بكيفية استعمال العرب للغتهم في الشعر والنثر. ❓ لذلك قد تعرف إعراب الجملة، ولا تزال بحاجة إلى أن تعرف: لماذا صيغت بهذه الطريقة؟ وما الذي أضافه هذا اللفظ دون غيره؟ وكيف يتغير المعنى بتغير الصياغة؟…

👍2❤1

3 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC624 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

💬 تخيَّل أن علم النحو يؤثر في حُكم فقهي؟! 🔸 تعرَّف كيف يكون ذلك من الشيخ/ البشير عصام المراكشي. تليجرام فيسبوك يوتيوب تويتر #بداية_اللغوي #مشاريع_تميز

❤3

31 Oct 2026, 11:59 UTC884 views7 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📚 أنواع الإعراب الثلاثة. ❓ هل تظهر علامة الإعراب على آخر كل كلمة؟ أم أن هناك كلمات تُقدَّر عليها العلامة، وأخرى يكون لها محلٌّ من الإعراب؟ 🔎 لفهم هذه المسألة، تعرّف إلى الأنواع الثلاثة للإعراب، والفرق بينها: 🔹الإعراب الظاهري: تظهر فيه علامة الإعراب على آخر الكلمة، مثل: جاء محمدٌ؛ فـ«محمدٌ» فاعل مرفوع، وعلامة رفعه الضمة الظاهرة. 🔹الإعراب التقديري: لا تظهر فيه علامة الإعراب على آخر الكلمة، بل تُقدَّر لسبب، مثل: جاء…

❤5👍2

29 Oct 2026, 15:51 UTC922 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

❓هل العفو والصفح والمغفرة بمعنى واحد؟ 📖 قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَإِن تَعْفُوا وَتَصْفَحُوا وَتَغْفِرُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ﴾ [التغابن: 14]. 👈 هنا نتأمل ثلاثة ألفاظ قرآنية متقاربة في المعنى، لكن لكلٍّ منها دلالته الخاصة: العفو: أن تترك مؤاخذة المسيء وعقوبته على ما فعل. الصفح: أن تُعرض عن إساءته، فلا تستمر في لومه وتذكيره بخطئه وتعييره به. المغفرة: أن تستر ذنبه، فلا تشيعه ولا تجعل إساءته حديثًا بين الناس. …

❤2👍2

28 Oct 2026, 11:40 UTC813 views0 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📚 لماذا يبدو النحو صعبًا؟ 🔎 كثيرًا ما ندخل إلى علم النحو بصورة ذهنية مسبقة: أنه علم طويل، وأبوابه كثيرة، ومصطلحاته متشابكة، وقواعده يصعب جمعها. ثم تمضي من مرحلة إلى أخرى، وتحفظ مسائل جديدة، لكنك تظل تسأل نفسك: ❓ ما العلاقة بين كل هذا؟ 🧩 هنا تكمن المشكلة. حين تتلقى النحو في صورة مجزأة ومفرقة، تدرس أبوابًا مختلفة دون أن تتكون في ذهنك صورة واضحة للعلم كله. تدرس الضمير، ثم تنتقل إلى تعدي الفعل ولزومه، ثم إلى المشت…

27 Oct 2026, 14:45 UTC756 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

﴿ إِنْ هُمْ إِلَّا كَالْأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ ﴾. ❓ هل يوجد أضلَّ من الأنعام؟! 💭 سؤالٌ استوقف الأستاذ الدكتور محمد محمد أبو موسى في بداية حياته، ولم تتكشف له أبعاده إلا مع مرور الأيام والتأمل في أحوال الناس. 🎥 شاهد المقطع، وتأمّل قوله: «التدبّر هو نصف العلم». تليجرام فيسبوك يوتيوب تويتر #بداية_اللغوي #مشاريع_تميز

❤1

26 Oct 2026, 14:12 UTC849 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📖 من إعراب القرآن الكريم ... قال الله تعالى: ﴿قُلِ اللَّهُ يُنَجِّيكُمْ مِنْهَا وَمِنْ كُلِّ كَرْبٍ﴾ [الأنعام: 64]. 🧭 يجمع هذا التركيب القرآني بين دقة البناء النحوي ووضوح المعنى؛ فالإعراب لا يقتصر على معرفة موقع كل كلمة، بل يكشف لنا أيضًا عن العلاقات التي تربط الكلمات والجمل، وكيف ينتظم الكلام في سياق واحد. 📚 وهنا نعرض إعراب الآية مختصرًا، وإليك الإعراب كاملًا: ﴿قُلِ﴾: فعل أمر مبنيّ على السكون وقد حرّك بالكسر منع…

❤4💯2

25 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC874 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📚 لماذا يُعَدُّ «لسان العرب» من أهم معاجم اللغة العربية؟ يأتي «لسان العرب» للإمام ابن منظور الأنصاري في مقدمة المعاجم العربية الموسَّعة، إذ جمع فيه مادةً واسعة من أمهات كتب اللغة، مثل تهذيب اللغة والصحاح والمحكم، إلى جانب الشواهد والنقول اللغوية. 🔹 وللكتاب طريقة مميزة في ترتيبه الأصلي؛ إذ يعتمد على الحرف الأخير من جذر الكلمة، وفق ترتيب القافية. فإذا أردت البحث عن كلمة «كتب»، فإنك تتجه إلى باب الباء، فصل الكاف. 👈 و…

❤4🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @allughawi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بداية اللغوي” (@allughawi), 6,478 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allughawi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.