Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cat_Cat 🐈‍⬛

@catx2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,538subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267075953
TypeChannel
Username@catx2
DescriptionСборник авторских статей, мемов и постов на историческую и научную тематику. «Познавательно, информативно и с юмором» — таков наш девиз. Связь: @Shyhartskoi Предложка: https://t.me/catx2?direct РКН: № 5289235146.
Created17 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/catx2

Growth

16,53416,55016,5426 August 2026 — 16,541 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,541 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,537 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,534 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,548 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,550 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,541 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,538 subscribers16,5386 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,532–16,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:0716,538-3
10 Aug 2026, 14:2516,541-9
9 Aug 2026, 12:5116,550+2
8 Aug 2026, 16:0516,548+14
7 Aug 2026, 12:5616,534-3
6 Aug 2026, 12:2116,537-4
6 Aug 2026, 05:3016,541no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:2416,541first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 16,538 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,390
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held30 (30 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total71,730
Reactions total1,674
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,880
Videos
28
Links
4,010

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

876 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35540.5%
👍24227.6%
🔥14416.4%
❤‍🔥445.02%
custom 5208795006394997187252.85%
🤔242.74%
202.28%
😁80.913%
👏50.571%
🤡30.342%
🌭20.228%
👌10.114%
👎10.114%
💯10.114%
🤣10.114%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,674reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @catx2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,130 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Любите ли вы классические автомобили? На этой фотографии их десятки, и ближайшие можно рассмотреть в подробностях. Кто может узнать их марки? А угадать место, время и причину односторонней пробки? Это американские туристы едут в Канаду через реку Ниагара, по мосту Мира, соединяющему города Баффало и Форт-Эри. Фотография сделана в уикенд Дня Труда (1-3 сентября) 1945 года. Подпись на сайте, где она выложена (его адре

27👍5🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈1,500 views57 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍3717❤‍🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,810 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Восьмая часть "Времени" — лирическое отступление о китайском менталитете, бюрократии и эзотерике, и о предприимчивых миссионерах. Часть I Часть II Часть III Часть IV Часть V Часть VI Часть VII #Зиннер #Лонг 📱 Подписаться: @catx2 Предложить пост — сюда 📥 🪙 Поддержать

👍1352❤‍🔥1😁1

11 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC≈2,050 views49 reactionsread 13 August 2026

А между тем, к Петру Великому было направлено послание, и тут источники разнятся: кто-то пишет, что его принесли сами жены шведских старших офицеров, кто-то пишет, что его доставил шведский барабанщик с просьбой о том, чтобы русский царь позволил женщинам покинуть осажденную крепость. Уж не знаю почему, но Петра Алексеевича это очень повеселило, и он ответил им, что нет, покинуть, любезные, крепость вы можете только

👍3784

10 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,200 views35 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

Присаживайтесь, котята. Я расскажу вам сказку. О том, как появился мир по версии сибирских народностей ханты и манси. #Заке #Лонг 📱 Подписаться: @catx2 Предложить пост — сюда 📥 🪙 Поддержать

🤔2210🔥2❤‍🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,280 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Доброго времени суток всем нашим читателям! Сегодня я наконец-то завершу своё затянувшееся повествование о русско-японской войне рассказом о Портсмутской конференции и сплошной несправедливости, буквально витавшей в воздухе. Приятного чтения. Часть I часть II Часть III Часть IV Часть V #Лебедев #Лонг 📱 Подписаться: @catx2 Предложить пост — сюда 📥 🪙 Поддержать

👍175👌1

8 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,940 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Сиквел, которого никто не ждал, приквел, о котором никто не просил. Продолжение цикла "Время" — о секундах, долготах и мореходах пойдёт речь в этом выпуске. Часть I Часть II Часть III Часть IV Часть V Часть VI #Зиннер #Лонг 📱 Подписаться: @catx2 Предложить пост — сюда 📥 🪙 Поддержать

20👍8👏5

7 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈3,010 views87 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @al_shyhartskoiPhoto

Сейчас читаю книжку — «Убить Гитлера», история всех покушений на него. Пока только начал, потому обзор будет позже, но уже с начальных страниц пошли занятные истории, о которых невозможно молчать и можно пересказывать как веселые байки на свадьбе, похоронах или свидании с девушкой. Момент подберете сами :) В общем, был у Гитлера верный человечек — генерал-полковник Вернер фон Фрич. Командовал Вермахтом с 1934 по 193

47🔥295👍4🌭2

7 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈2,550 views67 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Случайно набрел на картину шведского художника Густава Олафа Цедерстрема (Седерстрема) под названием «I gott kvarter», что в переводе на русский - «Хорошее соседство». Судя по всему, здесь отображена одна из проблем XVII-XVIII веков – жизнь военнослужащих на обывательской квартире. Как такое могло быть? Да по-разному: в походе войско, на маневрах, или в месте постоянного пребывания, но гражданское лицо, имевшее в со

👍4910🔥8

7 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,510 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @catlegatus

Пройдя по самому краешку от развязывания третьей мировой войны в ходе Карибского кризиса, по обе стороны Атлантики начались попытки поиска новых механизмов сдерживания. Ядерная война уже не казалась такой хорошей идеей, когда ты знал, что значительная часть твоей страны будет лежать в руинах уже через несколько часов после её начала. Однако осознание проблемы не значит, что есть однозначные методы её решения. https:/

❤‍🔥11🔥8custom 520879500639499718771

7 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,530 views78 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

47👍22🔥8👎1

6 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,850 views42 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @cat0newsPhoto

ПИВО! Всего четыре буквы, а сколько приятных воспоминаний! Светлое, тёмное, эли, лагеры — оно такое разнообразное, но всегда холодное и вкусное. Среди множества разнообразных видов пива, которые варились на просторах нашей необъятной родины, ярко выделяется «Жигулёвское». В 1950-е гг. до 90 % всего советского пива относилось к этому сорту. Его варили в каждом третьем городе СССР от Владивостока до Калининграда. Его

35😁7

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @catx2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 125,570 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cat_Cat 🐈‍⬛” (@catx2), 16,538 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catx2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.