Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Исторические сражения

Channel

Исторические сражения

@hist_battle

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,080subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001921598173
TypeChannel
Username@hist_battle
DescriptionМного военной истории до XX века и красочных иллюстраций в одном месте! По всем вопросам к @VyacheslavFW Добро пожаловать: https://t.me/+Rt4oProUCOYxMTRi Наш чат: https://t.me/+F7sOciqTnc9hNTli
Created25 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hist_battle

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,6809,0848,8826 August 2026 — 9,026 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,028 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,026 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,027 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,014 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,724 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,716 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,704 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,699 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,680 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,688 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,819 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,816 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,810 subscribers30 September 2026 — 8,915 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,919 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,917 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,902 subscribers22 October 2026 — 9,010 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,014 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,027 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,051 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,082 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,084 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,080 subscribers9,0806 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,619–9,145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 18:319,080-4
6 Nov 2026, 06:569,084+2
3 Nov 2026, 11:569,082+31
31 Oct 2026, 04:109,051+24
28 Oct 2026, 01:089,027+13
25 Oct 2026, 06:509,014+4
22 Oct 2026, 14:209,010+108
16 Oct 2026, 06:348,902-15
13 Oct 2026, 11:098,917-2
7 Oct 2026, 08:408,919+4
30 Sept 2026, 20:408,915+105
16 Sept 2026, 03:218,810-6
12 Sept 2026, 13:018,816-3
8 Sept 2026, 02:188,819+131
3 Sept 2026, 00:388,688+8
30 Aug 2026, 21:248,680-19
28 Aug 2026, 02:138,699-5
25 Aug 2026, 09:488,704-12
22 Aug 2026, 07:088,716-8
18 Aug 2026, 21:488,724first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 9,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held63 (26 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total60,578
Reactions total1,480
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 00:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,920
Videos
≈7
Links
≈587

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,188 reactions across 63 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,14151.1%
🔥1,51836.2%
🕊1393.32%
😢882.10%
💯751.79%
🤔661.58%
⚡431.03%
🤯421.00%
❤‍🔥290.692%
👎160.382%
🥴140.334%
😱70.167%
🤩60.143%
🥰40.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 63 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hist_battle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (3.85%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC728 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

1855 год, американский верблюжий корпус где-то в Калифорнии. Художник: William Ahrendt В 1843 году одному армейскому капитану пришла в голову чудная идея пересадить часть кавалеристов, дислоцировавшихся в теплых и засушливых регионах Америки, на верблюдов. Он подумал, что эта скотина еще и пригодится в качестве вьючного животного при решении вопросов снабжения. После череды провалов капитан не отчаивался. Ему все-т…

🤔12👍10

10 Nov 2026, 19:04 UTC≈1,550 views62 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

1870 год, французы заняли позиции в доме на окраине города Седан. Художник: Alphonse de Neuville В битве при Седане, 1 сентября 1870, главные силы в размере 82 тысяч солдат во главе с императором Наполеоном III были зажаты пруссаками в городе. В принципе, укрепления города были приспособлены для обороны от пехотных штурмов, вот только прусская армия не стала тратить на это силы. Артиллерия попросту превратила эти у…

🔥42🕊14⚡4👍2

9 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,750 views54 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Художественная реконструкция замка типа Motte and Bailey, распространённого в Англии и Нормандии в VI-XII вв. Замки типа «мотт и бейли» были главным символом нормандского завоевания Англии. После битвы при Гастингсе в 1066 году Вильгельм Завоеватель нуждался в быстром способе контролировать непокорное население. Небольшие и быстро возводимые, позволили Вильгельму быстро поставить остров под свой контроль. Мотт (Mo…

👍39🔥15

9 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC≈1,710 views51 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @wehistoryPhoto

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Лливелин ап Иорверт, он же Лливелин Великий — правитель королевства Гвинед и де-факто почти всего Уэльса в 1195-1240 годы. Один из самых могущественных уэльсских правителей. Внук Оуайна ап Грифида, другого объединителя уэльсских королевств и княжеств. Всю жизнь провёл в военных походах, в которых знал как победы, так и поражения, и в династических спорах за земли. Долгое время Лливелин не контролировал до ко…

🔥44🤔4❤‍🔥2👍1

8 Nov 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,860 views48 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Древнеруский город Возвягль (Възвягль) Упоминается на страницах Ипатьевской летописи только один раз в контексте событий 1256-1257 гг., когда он был полностью разорен и сожжен войсками Даниила Галицкого во время его борьбы с ордами монгольского темника Куремсы за гегемонию над Правобережьем Киевской земли. С летописным центром идентифицируют два городища, расположенных в 2-х км севернее города Новоград-Волынский Жи…

👍33🔥14💯1

6 Nov 2026, 17:53 UTC≈2,220 views57 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

301 год до н. э., боевые слоны диадохов (последователей) Александра в битве при Ипсе. Художник: Jose Daniel Cabrera Peña Александр Македонский впервые встречается с боевыми гигантами в битве при Гавгамелах в 331 г. до н. э. Персидский царь Дарий III держал 15 слонов, "которых привели с собой инды" (Arr., An., III.8). При этом животные не приняли участие в бою, оставаясь в лагере, и, как утверждает Арриан, все были з…

🔥33👍18💯6

6 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC≈2,580 views41 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @knifemediaPhoto

Римляне, как известно, любили зрелища. Особенно те, которые стоили баснословных денег. Индивидуальный бой высококлассных бойцов привлекал внимание и ценился, но, чтобы разнообразить события на арене, римляне часто устраивали поистине масштабные сражения. Часто бои служили пропагандистским целям — в случае очередного триумфа одну из сторон экипировали по подобию поверженного противника, что закрепляло в римском насел…

🤔23🔥12👍6

5 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTC≈2,380 views66 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

534 год. Триумф Велизария Художник: Milek Jakubiec Триумф Велизария, отпразднованный в Константинополе в 534 году после разгрома Вандальского королевства, внешне напоминал древнеримский триумф, но по своей сути был совершенно иным явлением. Главное отличие состояло в том, что это была не награда победоносному полководцу, а демонстрация подчинения императору. В республиканском Риме триумф был высшей воинской почесть…

👍39🔥17😱5🕊4⚡1

5 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,480 views42 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Одна из самых коротких войн в истории длилась меньше часа. В 1896 году Великобритания и Занзибар вступили в конфликт, который закончился примерно за 40 минут. Британский флот обстрелял дворец султана, и сопротивление быстро прекратилось. Подписывайтесь на «Лабораторию Культур», мы рассказываем о необычных событиях истории, древних цивилизациях и о том, почему мир устроен именно так.

👍30🔥7🤩4😢1

4 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC≈2,190 views71 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

1311 год, тевтонские рыцари в бою с литовцами. Художник: Giuseppe Rava Интересно, что в условиях "Северного крестового похода" германский рыцарский Орден был вынужден выработать совершенно новую стратегию и тактику. Суровый климат, особенности местности и противника, с которыми столкнулись тевтонцы, совершенно непривычны для западноевропейской военной мысли. При этом сам Орден унаследовал три аспекта военной традиц…

👍46🔥21🕊4

4 Nov 2026, 09:59 UTC≈2,420 views55 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

X век, морское сражение викингов. Художник: Johnny Shumate Викинги нередко устраивали сражения в открытом море. Как правило, это были конфликты враждующих кланов. Но иногда в морских битвах с норманнами сталкивались флоты европейских стран и городов. Эти бои обычно проходили по схожему сценарию. Викинги выстраивали свой флот в линию, связывая каждый корабль веревками. Так получалась стена из боевых кораблей. И воины…

👍48🕊5🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 04:59 UTC≈2,100 views92 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

1807 год, корпус маршала Ожеро попадает в метель в сражении при Прейсиш-Эйлау. Художник: Keith Rocco Есть в истории несколько сражений, в ход которых вмешивалась погода, внося серьезные коррективы. Одним из таких стала кровопролитная встреча русской и французской армий в 1807 году у небольшого городка в Восточной Пруссии. В начале Наполеон, чтобы помочь солдатам Даву разбить русский левый фланг, отправил в бой цель…

👍57🔥23🕊11👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @hist_battle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hist_battle edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @hist_battle as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Записки о Средневековье / Notatki o Średniowieczu / Medieval Notes
@medievalnotes · 20,261
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
История и истории
@historygothy · 20,837
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
Популярная наука
@PopularNauka · 20,355
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 September 2026
ЗЕЛЁНЫЙ МАЯК
@zlnmayak · 39,589
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Исторические сражения” (@hist_battle), 9,080 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hist_battle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.