Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Загадки истории с Лысым Камрадом

@popscienceru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

24,484subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001662521164
TypeChannel
Username@popscienceru
DescriptionИстория-археология — интересно, увлекательно и, главное, достоверно.РКН: clck.ru/3FYgzj По вопросам: @LKamrad Авторский контент! Копирование материалов без ссылки на источник запрещено! https://vk.com/lkamrad Реклама: https://telega.in/c/popscienceru
Created18 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/popscienceru

Growth

24,47724,49024,483.56 August 2026 — 24,477 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,481 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,490 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,489 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,490 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,487 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,486 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,483 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,485 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,484 subscribers24,4846 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,475–24,492 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:4424,484-1
13 Aug 2026, 23:3524,485+2
12 Aug 2026, 19:0324,483-3
11 Aug 2026, 16:2224,486-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:1224,487-3
9 Aug 2026, 16:0724,490+1
8 Aug 2026, 13:3824,489-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:3724,490+9
6 Aug 2026, 19:4424,481+4
6 Aug 2026, 02:3724,477first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 24,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,090
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held24 (2 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total98,110
Reactions total7,394
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,200
Videos
133
Links
4,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

6,448 reactions across 21 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,64241.0%
👍1,73526.9%
🔥1,60824.9%
😁2293.55%
😢400.62%
🍾370.574%
😱310.481%
❤‍🔥260.403%
👏240.372%
🙏160.248%
🤔160.248%
😭130.202%
🥰130.202%
🎉60.093%
👌50.078%
🤩40.062%
🤝30.047%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,394reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 24 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @popscienceru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,840 views229 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

С днем археолога всех причастных, отдельно и особенно тех, кто сейчас в поле!

121😁50👍37❤‍🔥14🍾7

15 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈2,040 views172 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

На улице жарит солнце — уже который день. Спасительная тень, шляпа на голове, холодное пиво — и жизнь начинает играть новыми красками. Ничего не меняется. 119 лет назад, в знойное лето 1907 года, фотограф Фрэнк Юджин точно так же утолял жажду в послеполуденный час. Автор этих снимков — его приятель Альфред Стиглиц. Цвета на фото подлинные: это не колоризация, а вполне доступная в то время технология автохрома. Я ли

👍104🍾30🔥1814👏3👌2🤩1

14 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈3,080 views267 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Эта мраморная статуя совы I - II века н.э. на самом деле была деловой вывеской, рекламирующей услуги прорицателя. Надпись на основании статуэтки на греческом языке гласит: «Архат Петрий, прорицатель, предскажет ваше будущее всего за четыре асса!» Способность сов охотиться в ночной темноте привела к вере в их дар видеть события в тумане грядущего. Возможно, эта статуэтка изображает не абстрактный символ, а вполне ре

101🔥76👍48😁40🥰2

14 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC≈3,420 views301 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Викторианские женские сапожки с меховой отделкой, украшенные узорчатой шелковой парчой и бантами из лент, ок. 1890–1895 гг. И да, в такой красоте вовсе не ходили по улицам! В XIX и начале XX века подобные каретные сапожки предназначались не для прогулок, а для защиты от холода — и надевались поверх основной обуви. Состоятельные дамы носили их поверх изящных вечерних туфель или шелковых башмачков, чтобы согреть ноги

👍14088🔥65🥰7😱1

13 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC≈3,670 views340 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сюрреалистичное произведение средневекового мастера, времени и жестоких морских ветров. Это статуя святой Хильды в нише церкви XIII века на мысе Хэдленд в Северной Англии. Уже восемь веков она противостоит соленым ветрам Северного моря. Морская соль проникает в толщу камня, кристаллизуется в порах и постепенно разъедает его изнутри. Смена периодов влажности и высыхания разрушает поверхность — геологи называют этот п

138🔥100👍56😱30🙏7😢5😁4

12 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈4,060 views292 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Римская инталия-печатка, изображающая двух кузнечиков (цикад?), сражающихся как гладиаторы, поздняя Республика, ок. I века до н.э. Материал — сердолик; размер — 17 x 21 x 3,5 мм. Первое фото — сама инталия, второе — ее оттиск. К сожалению, точное место и обстоятельства находки неизвестны. Частная коллекция; фото аукционного дома Bertolomi, 2020 Загадки истории с Лысым Камрадом #древний_рим #искусство

126🔥94👍58😁11👏2🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈4,120 views318 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Кто ж спорит, фреска «Тайная вечеря» Леонардо да Винчи — настоящий шедевр изобразительного искусства... Но, между нами, есть ли у него там вот эта замечательная пара: ленивый пушистый котик, греющийся у очага, и тощий пёсель, вылизывающий тарелки — добросовестно помогающий хозяевам мыть грязную посуду? А вот на фреске «Тайная вечеря» (1320 г.) Пьетро Лоренцетти они есть. Это просто к слову. Нижняя церковь Базилика

168👍85😁43🔥22

11 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC≈4,570 views313 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Девушка в белом платье у окна, цветное фото (не раскрашено!), Генрих Кюн, 1908 г. Удивительная атмосфера этого снимка создает впечатление, что перед нами картина талантливого художника или видение из послеполуденного сна, когда не понимаешь: ты все еще спишь или видишь это наяву. Безусловный шедевр ранней цветной фотографии из музея Метрополитен в Нью-Йорке. И да, вы угадали — я захотел узнать, кто эта девушка, вед

184👍81🔥48

11 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈4,470 views268 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Надгробный рельеф из древнеримского колумбария с изображением собаки и эпитафией: «Для милого Метилиана Луций Новий Априлис сделал (это)». Рим, ок. I - II века н.э. Да, эта табличка закрывала нишу в колумбарии с урной с прахом домашнего любимца. Размер панели — 32 см в длину. Латинский текст надписи: METILIANO DELICIO L NOVIVS APRILIS FECIT. К сожалению, точное место и обстоятельства находки неизвестны. Артефакт б

151👍71🔥33😢13

10 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC≈4,620 views312 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Древнеримская бронзовая чаша-сито, найденная на вилле близ Помпей, I век н.э. Её нашли более 100 лет назад у подножия Везувия, в Боскореале, на небольшой сельской вилле (участок Паскуале Витьелло). Эта перфорированная бронзовая чаша была изготовлена около 2000 лет назад мастером-гравером по имени Фелицио, о чем свидетельствует его надпись на ободке сита: PERTVDIT POMPEIS FELICIO («Фелиций пробил её в Помпеях»). Впо

145🔥92👍68👏6🤔1

10 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC≈4,890 views482 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Это не колоризация старого фотоснимка, а реальный цветной снимок «Энн Мердок с Баззером IV», 1914 год. Наткнулся на это замечательное атмосферное фото (в технике автохрома — первой коммерческой технологии цветной фотографии), снятое 112 лет назад. Девушка с сияющими медными волосами и спокойный рыжий кот на диване. Автор — фотограф Арнольд Генте (Arnold Genthe). На фото 1 — это цифровая «реставрация» с улучшенной

298👍112🔥65🥰4🤝3

9 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC≈4,140 views323 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Невероятно красочный мозаичный пол XII века в соборе Чивита-Кастеллана в Италии Этот пол в соборе Санта-Мария-Маджоре создан знаменитыми римскими мастерами из династии Космати (Cosmati) при папе Иннокентии III. Для создания долговечного и роскошного геометрического узора мастера использовали технику сполиации — вторичную переработку античных римских строительных материалов (цветного мрамора и порфира из разрушенных

151🔥115👍57

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @popscienceru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@popscienceru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 34,304 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Загадки истории с Лысым Камрадом” (@popscienceru), 24,484 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/popscienceru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.