Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TON na Kote (EN)

Channel

TON na Kote (EN)

@scroogerslink

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,604subscribers

-2,606 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002144249144
TypeChannel
Username@scroogerslink
DescriptionChannel of Mr.Cat. Partners, Advertisement - @splinter925 Ru Channel - https://t.me/tonnakote
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/scroogerslink

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,60437,21035,9076 August 2026 — 37,210 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,068 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,035 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,986 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,909 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,859 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,807 subscribers15 August 2026 — 36,742 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,622 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,542 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,494 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,448 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,403 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,334 subscribers23 August 2026 — 36,263 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,122 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,068 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,020 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,979 subscribers29 August 2026 — 35,942 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,887 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,812 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,747 subscribers2 September 2026 — 35,688 subscribers3 September 2026 — 35,616 subscribers5 September 2026 — 35,506 subscribers8 September 2026 — 35,356 subscribers11 September 2026 — 35,259 subscribers13 September 2026 — 35,143 subscribers14 September 2026 — 35,064 subscribers16 September 2026 — 34,965 subscribers19 September 2026 — 34,878 subscribers25 September 2026 — 34,604 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -2,606. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,213–37,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 18:3734,604-274
19 Sept 2026, 00:4034,878-87
16 Sept 2026, 18:0134,965-99
14 Sept 2026, 18:2135,064-79
13 Sept 2026, 07:1635,143-116
11 Sept 2026, 12:5535,259-97
8 Sept 2026, 23:3635,356-150
5 Sept 2026, 16:3635,506-110
3 Sept 2026, 14:1935,616-72
2 Sept 2026, 04:5635,688-59
1 Sept 2026, 05:4435,747-65
31 Aug 2026, 06:0435,812-75
30 Aug 2026, 03:2835,887-55
29 Aug 2026, 01:4335,942-37
28 Aug 2026, 00:0835,979-41
26 Aug 2026, 21:5436,020-48
25 Aug 2026, 20:0336,068-54
24 Aug 2026, 18:5736,122-141
23 Aug 2026, 00:3836,263-71
21 Aug 2026, 15:5336,334first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.442%
avg views ÷ 34,604 subscribers
Avg views / post
153
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held23 (21 January 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total612
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
232
Videos
16
Links
142

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
47s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2938.2%
👍1823.7%
❤1519.7%
👏911.8%
👎45.26%
😢11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scroogerslink. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

❤️ My first beach volleyball camp with Dima Vasilevsky. 🌏 I tried a new kind of experience for myself. People from all over the world come together in one place and train together for a week. There were 22 people at the camp, divided into 3 groups based on skill level. I was in the beginner group. Over the course of the week, we had around 9 training sessions and 2 tournaments. Overall, I definitely improved my be…

❤1👍1

27 Sept 2026, 12:24 UTC165 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Off we go — yes is yes, no is no, let there be light 😄

26 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC211 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Got back into prop trading with Hash Hedge. I’ll be doing the challenge here. What’s the advantage? Let’s say you have $100. It’s pretty hard to make serious money trading regular futures with that amount. Prop trading is an alternative: you pay $100, pass two challenge stages, and get a $10,000 account to trade with. Making a significant profit becomes much easier, and the profit you earn is yours. I’ve attached a …

4 Jun 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Hash Hedge reached out to me and offered to give away a $10,000 funded account! 🎉 The giveaway will be held among everyone who purchases any prop account from Hash Hedge using my referral link. The winner will be announced on June 30 in my channel! 🚀 To participate, register using this link: https://hashhedge.com/?fpr=1jag4i Good luck to everyone! 🍀

👍1👎1

30 May 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,640 views0 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Interesting that with Hash Hedge you only need 5 trading days in the first stage, not 5 profitable days. Last time I failed because I was short by just one day in the second stage.

29 May 2026, 10:45 UTC≈1,440 views3 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

I bought a challenge in a Hash Hedge for 300 dollars. Let's play the game?

👍1👎1😢1

28 May 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,450 views28 reactions1 Starread 28 September 2026

👋 Hey everyone — a little reset. I found a new source of inspiration, and I’m starting the channel again. I don’t know how many of you are still here, but I’m really happy to be here with you again ✨🤍

❤11👏9👍8

17 Mar 2026, 20:00 UTC≈2,110 viewsread 28 September 2026

👍 possible NFT upgrade links 🎁 Mood Pack — t.me/nft/MoodPack-1

16 Mar 2026, 19:17 UTC≈1,590 viewsread 28 September 2026
Video

Wallet has released a mini-game. Wallet has always treated me well, so here’s the link. Try to guess the price of gold / TON / BTC / ETH / oil — $1000 will be raffled among those who guess correctly. >>>GAME IN WALLET<<<

1 Mar 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,370 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026

🔄 Telegram — What’s New in the Latest Update ✨ Here’s what’s been added: 🎁 Blockchain Gifts in Craft You can now use them, but they can’t be placed in the first slot (the gift number doesn’t transfer). 🎨 Edit Any Stickers More freedom to customize your stickers. 🏷 New Chat Tags Makes it easier to organize and navigate conversations. 📌 Pinned Gift Numbers Displayed You can now see the numbers of pinned gifts. 🔒 …

❤2

28 Feb 2026, 12:46 UTC977 views6 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

🔥 What do we have from today’s escalation? Israel carried out a preemptive strike against Iran. In Tel Aviv, the operation was called “Roar of the Lion,” while the Pentagon referred to its involvement as “Epic Fury.” Here are a few thoughts on what’s happening: 1⃣ A preemptive strike by Israel looks like a logical move. If a clash is inevitable, taking the initiative has strategic value. 2⃣ Israel is conducting an…

👍3👎2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @scroogerslink. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Lost Dogs Holder
@wolfa · 2,405
#1
Gram of TON
@gram · 6,641,039
#2
Bossy Callz 🇵🇸{ReBuilding Arc}
@Bossy_Callz · 13,818
#3
based kook calls
@hellokook · 16,162
#4
Make Money With Matt 💰
@MakeMoneyWithMattTG · 27,951
#5
Eddy’s House
@MrEduTrades · 12,610
#6
Akatsuki Degen Ape
@Akatsuki_Calls_x1000 · 10,483
#7
Era Of Explorers(EOE)
@EraOfExplorers · 703,871
#8
ETHΞRHUNT GΛMBLΞ 🎲
@EtherHuntChanneL · 1,220
#9
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 80,140
#10
IROOD
@IROODdesign · 1,981
#11
Innovation Station | Новости IT
@innovation_station · 2,186
#12
Новости без политоты
@non_political_news · 3,696
#13
Financial reality | Экономические Новости
@financial_reality · 3,302
#14
Crypto Hub | Крипта
@crypto_hub_crypto_hub · 2,324
#15
Money360° | Новости финансов
@Money360_economics · 1,980
#16
MindBoost | Психология и Саморазвитие
@mindboost_psychology · 1,197
#17
В потоке | В ресурсе | В ах** 🙋‍♀️
@vresurse_vpotoke · 2,814
#18
Beauty&Health Hub | Красота и здоровье
@Beauty_Health_Hub · 3,176
#19
Кулинарный Эксперимент | #Рецепты
@kulinar_experement · 2,325
#20
НейроДичь
@dich_ai · 3,292
#21
Лига Конференций УЕФА | UEFA Conference League
@uefa_conference_league_tg · 2,936
#22
МЕТРОПОЛИС
@metropolisru · 12,498
#23
Phantom Intelligence 💰
@joinphantomtdi · 1,200
#24
سیگنال فارکس
@ForexbyAA · 8,378
#25
Благовещенск №1
@amurblg1 · 45,224
#26
Raidbet | Отзывы®️
@Raidbet_reviews · 1,237
#27
Величие России
@GreatnessRussia · 3,629
#28
СМЫВКИ ОБЩЕСТВА 🔞
@smivki · 1,223
#29
Философия Самурая
@filosofiya_samuraya · 350
#30
АЗАРТНЫЙ ЛИМОНЧИК
@azartlimon · 67,388
#31
sweetorunails
@sweetoru_nails · 471 (as read 28 September 2026)
#32
📉껑껑이의 메모장📈
@kkeongsmemo · 10,875
#33
𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 𝕏
@PlayTokenX · 5,161
#34
Скат media
@mediaskat · 3,709
#35
Crypto games | Main
@crypto_click_games · 1,178
#36
Даня Хайп 🔥
@DanyaHype1 · 2,757
#37
Token Chasers | Криптоигры
@Token_Chasers · 1,340
#38
МРІЯ || УКРАЇНА
@MriyaUAnews · 1,717
#39
کانال رسمی صرافی کبرین
@kebrincryptoexchange · 11,621
#40
Женская логика By VioletZhu
@byvioletzhu · 1,583
#41
ПЯТАЯ ВЛАСТЬ
@vlast_com · 11,179
#42
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 37,091
#43
Святослав Олегович ✨
@husievsviatoslav · 10,168
#44
Жизнь глазами Темы Зимирева
@kogkuo · 622
#45
Шкафчик в ванной
@bathroom_cabinet · 4,821
#46
𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗠𝗘 𝗙𝗔𝗡𝗦
@NinjaAnimeFans · 75
#47
Noticias del Mundo y Venezuela
@NotiMundoyVzla · 22,054
#48
Raidbet | Статистика®️
@Raidbet_statistic · 3,551
#49

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Whales TON
@WhalesTON_C · 19,939
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TON na Kote (EN)” (@scroogerslink), 34,604 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scroogerslink.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.