Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
51,400 average views per post against 79,644 subscribers — an engagement rate of 64.6%. Across the 3,503 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,629–99,976 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.78% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.00%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,439,500
Mature posts only
64.6% over 28 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net +3,747. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,976–83,860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 14:36
81,032
-381
5 Nov 2026, 16:36
81,413
+1,769
4 Nov 2026, 14:16
79,644
-94
3 Nov 2026, 12:06
79,738
+658
2 Nov 2026, 15:01
79,080
+702
1 Nov 2026, 18:01
78,378
-162
31 Oct 2026, 17:08
78,540
-312
30 Oct 2026, 19:37
78,852
-1,545
29 Oct 2026, 20:39
80,397
+541
28 Oct 2026, 18:17
79,856
-296
27 Oct 2026, 21:31
80,152
-283
26 Oct 2026, 18:05
80,435
-244
25 Oct 2026, 18:37
80,679
+1,966
24 Oct 2026, 17:10
78,713
-163
23 Oct 2026, 18:58
78,876
-186
22 Oct 2026, 19:25
79,062
-810
21 Oct 2026, 17:57
79,872
-550
20 Oct 2026, 14:30
80,422
+264
19 Oct 2026, 12:28
80,158
+197
18 Oct 2026, 10:28
79,961
first reading
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
63.8%
avg views ÷ 81,032 subscribers
Avg views / post
51,700
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
27
of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
45 (16 June 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
1,394,900
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
We never speak without reason our words are always backed by sincerity.
We genuinely want nothing but the best for all of you.
🙌☘️
$BTC +2R 💰
| Jusko Support Chat Team | 👨💻
Most people think it was a real theft but they don’t realize that sometimes when you need to withdraw large amounts of money quietly this is how it’s done.
Always think one step ahead and I swear you’ll never stay poor !
🐋
How accurately can we predict ! We believe no one can do it with this Perfection ☘️
Catched the Drop 🩸
Take Profit 3 Hit ✅️ +2.7R 💰
| Jusko Analyst Team | ⚡️
Members, Bullish 🦖 Momentum Looks Real.
Momentum Changes With Time & We provide Update Accordingly.
⚠️ We Tell What We Observe NFA !
| Jusko Analyst Team | ⚡️
🚨 Insider Bearish 🐻 Momentum Is Increasing Today!
⚠️ After 12 PM UTC, things are looking more concerning.
Members, We share updates based on what we see in the market. This is how retail traders can get trapped if they are not careful. ⚠️
| Jusko Analyst Team | ⚡️
We’re seeing Insider bullish momentum on HTF & Will be building Long 🦖 positions on dips. 🩸
Today During the New York session, we may get a potential 🩸 dip. If it occurs we’ll look to build longs 🦖 but only after all our validations are in place.
| Jusko Analyst Team | ⚡️
We Knew What was Coming ! 🦖
No one Can do What we are Doing 🚨
We are +4R Today, Build 3 Longs 🦖 Position 💰
| Jusko Analyst Team | ⚡️
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @juskotraderreal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Jusko Trader 🐋 @juskotraderreal1 · 69,536 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
Verified Crypto Traders ® @VerifiedCryptoTradersgram · 20,330 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 22 September 2026
Breaking News (TimeBucks.com) @breakingnewstb · 38,522 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 29 August 2026
Crypto Taha Free Group @CryptoTaha11 · 28,103 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Whale Alerts @Whale_Alerts_io · 28,401 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
Crypto Prediction Official @cryptoprediction · 27,380 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jusko Trader” (@juskotraderreal), 81,032 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juskotraderreal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.