Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)

Channel

CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)

@cryptoamanclubpremium

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,810subscribers

+3,609 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744711450
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoamanclubpremium
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoamanclubpremium

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@cryptoamanclubpremium/41750 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC@cryptoamanvipfreemium/234726 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoamanclubpremium/41759 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 01:39 UTC@cryptoamanvipfreemium/234817 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoamanclubpremium/41767 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC@cryptoamanvipfreemium/234897 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoamanclubpremium/41790 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC@cryptoamanvipfreemium/235127 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoamanclubpremium/41793 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC@cryptoamanvipfreemium/235157 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoamanclubpremium/41796 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC@cryptoamanvipfreemium/235187 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@cryptoamanvipfreemium26 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (26–0)
@AMANVIPCRYPTOSIGNALSPREMIUM15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@AMANVIPCRYPTOSIGNALSPREMIUM (12–3)
@cryptoamanclub9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@cryptoamanclub (9–0)
@fantom_signal5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 21 of the 21 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 28 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @cryptoamanclub. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

22,20126,18424,192.57 August 2026 — 22,201 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,184 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,180 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,172 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,164 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,155 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,139 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,131 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,132 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,122 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,119 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,105 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,099 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,101 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,092 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,088 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,091 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,081 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,084 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,079 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,071 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,060 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,053 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,041 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,023 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,006 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,981 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,954 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,935 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,915 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,891 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,858 subscribers26 September 2026 — 25,810 subscribers25,8107 August 202626 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net +3,609. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,604–26,781 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 08:5625,810-48
17 Sept 2026, 09:3825,858-33
15 Sept 2026, 07:1625,891-24
13 Sept 2026, 17:3725,915-20
11 Sept 2026, 19:1725,935-19
9 Sept 2026, 06:5725,954-27
5 Sept 2026, 23:1825,981-25
3 Sept 2026, 17:1626,006-17
2 Sept 2026, 07:3426,023-18
1 Sept 2026, 08:0726,041-12
31 Aug 2026, 11:1726,053-7
30 Aug 2026, 13:3826,060-11
29 Aug 2026, 13:5326,071-8
28 Aug 2026, 11:1726,079-5
27 Aug 2026, 09:2326,084+3
26 Aug 2026, 08:5426,081-10
25 Aug 2026, 08:4526,091+3
24 Aug 2026, 10:1226,088-4
22 Aug 2026, 17:5226,092-9
21 Aug 2026, 11:1526,101first reading

Engagement

667 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.73%
avg views ÷ 25,810 subscribers
Avg views / post
705
147 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
147
of 667 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held667 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total103,683
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 22:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈21,200
Videos
≈1,430
Links
≈6,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 09s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC369 viewsread 26 September 2026

🔊ASTER LONG SCALP TRADE UPDATE: TARGET 1 DONE ✅ TARGET 2 DONE ✅ TARGET 3 ALMOST DONE ✅ Book 50% profit here and move your SL at entry.

26 Sept 2026, 17:14 UTC410 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🔥 BIG SURPRISE THIS SUNDAY! 👉We have something special planned for you all. 🎁 Not revealing it yet… but make sure you don’t miss it! 👀 Also, a SPECIAL PRIME EMA SESSION at Sunday - 2 PM, where we’ll cover: ♦️ Prime EMA basics ♦️ Entries & Exits ♦️ Stop Loss ♦️ Strategy + Risk Management 📅 Sunday | 2 PM Join on time. The surprise is waiting! 🔥🚀

26 Sept 2026, 14:07 UTC593 viewsread 26 September 2026

🔊TAO LONG SCALP TRADE UPDATE: TARGET 1 DONE ✅ TARGET 2 DONE ✅ TARGET 3 DONE ✅ TARGET 4 DONE ✅ TARGET 5 DONE ✅ All Targets HIT 🎯 Send your profit card Now.💰 👉

26 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC770 viewsread 26 September 2026

✅ SCALP TRADE - TAO 🏮 TYPE - LONG 👉 ENTRY - $320 - $315 👉 TARGET - $322, $325, $327, $330 & $332+ 👉 SL - $308 🚨LEVERAGE - 15x 🔴TRADE VALID ON - https://bingx.pro/partner/CryptoAman/ Trader - Apple #nfa #dyor

26 Sept 2026, 07:25 UTC784 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🔥 BIG SURPRISE THIS SUNDAY! We have something special planned for you all. 🎁 Not revealing it yet… but make sure you don’t miss it! 👀 Also, a SPECIAL PRIME EMA SESSION at 2 PM, where we’ll cover: ♦️ Prime EMA basics ♦️ Entries & Exits ♦️ Stop Loss ♦️ Strategy + Risk Management 📅 Sunday | 2 PM Join on time. The surprise is waiting! 🚀

26 Sept 2026, 05:20 UTC741 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

ZOOM FOR LIVE LONG AND SHORT TRADES - PRIME ALGO RIGHT SETTINGS TO TRADE - HOW TO USE LIQUIDITY MAP AND PRIME ALGO IN 1 TRADE 👉 LIVE PROFIT - Join Now https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84695502143?pwd=Ghxna1ZJac3uYCynm21r8fp5DRHClD.1

26 Sept 2026, 03:30 UTC758 viewsread 26 September 2026
Video

🚨URGENT UPDATE 🚨 👉 Worlds Most Secure Exchange Entered In India 🇮🇳 👉 Time To Leave BINANCE , MEXC, BITGET , COINDCX AND DELTA AND JOIN COINBASE. 👉 WORLS LOWEST TRADING WITH ( 70% less than Coindcx ) ✅ JOIN NOW - https://advanced.coinbase.com/join/C9K9FCJ

26 Sept 2026, 01:51 UTC732 viewsread 26 September 2026

🔊HBAR LONG SCALP TRADE UPDATE: TARGET 1 DONE ✅ TARGET 2 DONE ✅ TARGET 3 ALMOST DONE ✅ Book 50% profit here and move your SL at entry.

25 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC859 viewsread 26 September 2026

🟢BITCOIN New scalp setup Direction: Conditional LONG Status: WAIT—no market entry now Confidence now: 6.9/10 Confidence after complete trigger: 8.1/10 Expected window: 5 minutes–12 hours Mandatory trigger 1. A 5-minute candle closes above $84,220. 2. Price retests $84,100–$84,190 within the next three 5-minute candles. 3. No 5-minute close below $84,080 during that retest. Entry: $84,110–$84,190 only after the trig…

25 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTC823 viewsread 26 September 2026

✅ SCALP TRADE - HBAR 🏮 TYPE - LONG 👉 ENTRY - $0.0935 - $0.092 👉 TARGET - $0.0942, $0.095, $0.096, $0.0974 & $0.0985+ 👉 SL - $0.0885 🚨LEVERAGE - 12x 🔴TRADE VALID ON - https://bingx.pro/partner/CryptoAman/ Trader - Apple #nfa #dyor

25 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC846 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

ZOOM FOR LIVE LONG AND SHORT TRADES - PRIME ALGO RIGHT SETTINGS TO TRADE - HOW TO USE LIQUIDITY MAP AND PRIME ALGO IN 1 TRADE 👉 LIVE PROFIT - Join Now https://us06web.zoom.us/j/86406586970?pwd=YyH4aFtNTi6UXwkTkm8r1NoEDtpl5W.1

Showing the 12 most recent of 667 posts we hold for @cryptoamanclubpremium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@cryptoamanclubpremium edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭
@DoctorProfit_Crypto · 21,919
#1
Top Crypto News
@TopCryptoNewsTg · 15,493
#2
#Bitcoin Radar
@Radar_Bitcoin · 7,599
#3
CRYPTO AMAN VIP
@aman_crypto_signals · 6,748
#4
Bitcoin Assassins©
@BitcoinAssassins · 15,405
#5
Rose Vip Signal | 1 BTC -> 100 BTC
@rosecryptochannelsignals · 9,667
#6
the bitcoin diner
@thebitcoindiner · 15,201
#7
Dr. Profit Vip 🚀
@drprofitcryptosignal · 22,431
#8
Inner Circle VIP FREE
@innercirclevipbyCF · 7,622
#9
Binance 360 Spot - By Banana Bot
@Binance_360_spot · 8,384
#10
CRYPTO AMAN
@cryptoamanclub · 104,044
#11
Bitcoin Magazine
@BitcoinMagazineTelegram · 9,999
#12
Rose Crypto Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@cryptorosechannelll · 5,986
#13
Crypto Freemium
@crypto_freemium · 11,743
#14
AMAN VIP CRYPTO SIGNALS LEAK
@amanvipcrypto · 11,189
#15
Crypto Freemium (Moderate - High Risk Calls)
@Crypto_Freemium2 · 7,514
#16
Crypto AMAN VIP Freemium
@cryptoamanvipfreemium · 3,864
#17
Crypto King
@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis · 5,478
#18
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 28,038
#19
Token Hunters | TH
@TokenHunters_TH · 5,371
#20
CCC.io Private Club VIP/Premium Free
@CryptoCoinsCoachCF · 4,565
#21
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋
@BCUSAReal · 148,789
#22
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 329,566
#23
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™
@arscryptocalls7 · 130,875
#24
USA News
@USANewsTg · 8,668
#25
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 313,376
#26
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 101,678
#27
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,559
#28
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 103,481
#29
Crypto cove - By Banana Bot
@Crypto_Cove_Signals · 3,933
#30
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 192,465
#31
Always Win Premium
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,667
#32
Binance Pumps®
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,978
#33
Crypto Sharks®
@CryptoSharksTelegram · 17,003
#34
AltSignals VIP
@AltSignal_VIP · 7,928
#35
Wolfx Signals Vip
@WolfxCrypto_VIP · 7,800
#36
Financial News
@FinancialNewsTg · 16,274
#37
Rose Signals - 0.1 BTC to 100 BTC 🌹
@rosecryptochannelpremium · 14,438
#38
DOGS Community
@dogs · 7,065,215
#39
Master of Binance - By Banana Bot
@Master_of_binanace · 10,770
#40
Wolf of Trading® - ViP
@Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP · 6,581
#41
Rose Crypto Signals | Official Channel
@RoseSignals_Premium · 10,951
#42
Dr Profit VIP Free
@drprofitfreebycf · 5,039
#43
Cash Haters 💰
@Cash_Haters · 7,415
#44
Blue Bison Crypto®
@BlueBisonCrypto · 5,207
#45
Blockchain Clowns
@BlockchainClowns · 5,132
#46
CryptoHolic©
@CryptoHolicss · 5,266
#47
Always Win ( Orginal ) - By Banana Bot
@Always_winn · 6,272
#48
Crypto News
@CryptoNewsBroadcast · 2,554
#49
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,516
#50
Rose 🌹
@rose · 85,706
#51
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,390
#52
Donald Trump 🇺🇸
@realdonaldtrumpchannel · 2,346
#53
World of Statistics
@worldofstatstg · 2,737
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭
@DoctorProfit_Crypto · 21,919
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
Binance Killers® VIP Signals
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 47,021
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Dr. Profit Vip 🚀
@drprofitcryptosignal · 22,431
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 20 September 2026
Waqar Zaka Group 📊
@waqarzaka_channel · 101,229
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Pump Club 📈
@CryptopumpcIub · 26,856
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026
Bitcoin Bullets®
@BitcoinBullets · 101,594
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 28,038
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Crypto
@signal_bitcoins · 53,936
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
Binance signals
@binance_futures · 25,504
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@CryptoRoseChannell · 100,636
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
CoinCodeCap Classic
@coincodecap · 25,395
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
Wolf of Trading®
@wolfoftrading · 127,711
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 202,753
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Steven Goldman® Crypto Fututes Signals
@StevenGoldmanCryptoFutures · 53,581
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals0rg · 45,613
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Alex Friedman | Crypto Future
@AlexFriedmanCrypto · 64,309
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
BULLSTAR - SIGNALS
@BULLSTAR1 · 79,604
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Wall Street Queen OFFICIAL ®️
@wallstreetqueenofficialTG · 206,179
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 313,376
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
CRYPTO RK™️
@CryptoRKsignals · 105,538
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
Wall Street Queen Official®️
@wallstreet_queenofficial · 135,014
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 August 2026
Jusko Trader
@juskotraderreal · 80,772
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 96,908
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Signalpeak
@Signalpeak24 · 23,188
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)” (@cryptoamanclubpremium), 25,810 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoamanclubpremium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.