Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Prediction Official

Channel

Crypto Prediction Official

@cryptoprediction

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,001subscribers

+12,632 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001218338928
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoprediction
DescriptionCrypto Prediction, Binance Futures Crypto Signals, Buy sell Admin @heythereadmin Disclaimer:- We are not responsible for any kind of loss happen with our signals... This channel is made for education purpose only This is not financial advice DYOR
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoprediction

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,03146,04733,0396 August 2026 — 20,369 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,369 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,301 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,268 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,236 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,223 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,195 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,169 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,148 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,119 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,074 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,031 subscribers18 August 2026 — 46,047 subscribers19 August 2026 — 45,440 subscribers20 August 2026 — 45,198 subscribers21 August 2026 — 45,032 subscribers23 August 2026 — 44,726 subscribers24 August 2026 — 44,415 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,288 subscribers26 August 2026 — 44,158 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,080 subscribers28 August 2026 — 43,650 subscribers29 August 2026 — 43,169 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,827 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,298 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,783 subscribers2 September 2026 — 41,458 subscribers3 September 2026 — 41,052 subscribers6 September 2026 — 40,074 subscribers9 September 2026 — 38,381 subscribers11 September 2026 — 37,759 subscribers13 September 2026 — 37,639 subscribers15 September 2026 — 37,402 subscribers17 September 2026 — 33,750 subscribers19 September 2026 — 33,624 subscribers26 September 2026 — 33,001 subscribers33,0016 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net +12,632. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,129–49,949 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 09:1933,001-623
19 Sept 2026, 09:3933,624-126
17 Sept 2026, 02:1933,750-3,652
15 Sept 2026, 04:3937,402-237
13 Sept 2026, 15:5937,639-120
11 Sept 2026, 19:2037,759-622
9 Sept 2026, 10:3638,381-1,693
6 Sept 2026, 00:1940,074-978
3 Sept 2026, 18:5741,052-406
2 Sept 2026, 13:0441,458-325
1 Sept 2026, 11:2341,783-515
31 Aug 2026, 14:3342,298-529
30 Aug 2026, 17:2542,827-342
29 Aug 2026, 17:1243,169-481
28 Aug 2026, 15:2443,650-430
27 Aug 2026, 15:1244,080-78
26 Aug 2026, 17:0344,158-130
25 Aug 2026, 16:1644,288-127
24 Aug 2026, 18:4544,415-311
23 Aug 2026, 05:5444,726first reading

Engagement

165 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.35%
avg views ÷ 33,001 subscribers
Avg views / post
446
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.667%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 165 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held165 (25 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total24,077
Reactions total109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,060
Videos
≈262
Links
≈286

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

362 reactions across 94 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤25169.3%
🔥328.84%
😁246.63%
💯184.97%
👏133.59%
😍41.10%
🥰41.10%
😈30.829%
🤔30.829%
🥴30.829%
🤨20.552%
🤯20.552%
🐳10.276%
😨10.276%
🤓10.276%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 165 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 163 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptoprediction. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 165 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC119 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Btc can go downside max $80-81k Where you guys can take entries... Target will be same remain as $91k upside

❤1

29 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC170 views10 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Signals will be given soon keep yourself active

❤6💯3👏1

21 Sept 2026, 09:47 UTC566 views5 reactions11 Starsread 29 September 2026

I hope you guys are making $$$$ with our free signals and predictions 🚀🤘🙏

❤4🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 165 posts we hold for @cryptoprediction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTCAnonymous Poll95 voters

What's btc next target ?

  1. $83k56%
  2. $73k47%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Poll77 voters

Do you guys wants daily signals ?

  1. Yes82%
  2. No21%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

Which target btc will achieve first ?

  1. $60k45%
  2. $67k55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Crypto Signal 📈
@free_crypto_signal0 · 1,641
#1
𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚
@cryptoleadsw · 379
#2
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 329,566
#3
Crypto Duniya
@Cryptoworld022 · 454
#4
The Bitcoin
@TheBitcoin537 · 21,037
#5
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 103,481
#6
CRYPTO AMAN
@cryptoamanclub · 104,044
#7
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋
@BCUSAReal · 148,636
#8
Binance Free Crypto Trading
@Free_Binance_Crypto_Future · 124,842
#9
MAK CRYPTO SIGNALS ®
@maktrading · 15,354
#10
Crypto TA King 🐋
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 91,559
#11
Crypto Gang Charts
@cryptogangcharts · 446
#12
💰💰 CryptoGG ❤️❤️
@cryptogg · 101,711
#13
KING CRYPTO ️
@KingCryptoCalls · 310,938
#14
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 101,678
#15
Wise Advice Signal
@wiseadvicebysumit · 170,339
#16
Crypto Tech & Signals
@CryptoTechW · 7,368
#17
Learn with Rony kapoor
@learnwithronykapoor · 32,971
#18
ESTR - EAT SLEEP TRADE REPEAT
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,158
#19
FOREX TALKS
@forextalksbudhil · 7,841
#20
Crypto Jargon
@cryptojargon69 · 36,106
#21
Global Crypto Research
@Official_GCR · 53,069
#22
Crypto Safe Calls™
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 133,799
#23
FCT Charts
@fctcharts · 4,763
#24
Profit On Charts
@Profitoncharts · 528
#25
CRYPTO TALKS
@CryptoTalksBudhil · 89,099
#26
Crypto Learn
@CryptoTradingVipGroup · 4,441
#27
CRYPTO GEEK
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,649
#28
CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,810
#29
Bitcoin Boss
@TCClubb · 3,882
#30
Lm Exchange (DEX) 🔥
@LM_Exchange · 9,387
#31
Crypto With Khan
@startfromzerofamily · 44,114
#32
Crypto Infinitum™
@CryptoInfinitum · 14,962
#33
Whales_Pumps
@Whales_Pumps · 53,405
#34
Bitcoin Brother Signals 💯 | Beware Of Scammers
@bitcoinbrother · 14,971
#35
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 256,062
#36
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 324,743
#37
CRYPTO HUSTLE
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,774
#38
Your Crypto Guy 🇮🇳
@itsyourCryptoGuy · 11,830
#39
𝙲𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚝𝚘 𝚂𝚊𝚝
@CryptoSatRed · 11,500
#40
Shivam trading academy 📊
@shivamtradingacademy0319 · 11,707
#41
Counting crypto( verify the link from YouTube)
@countingcrypto2 · 1,287
#42
SaQii Crypto [ Official Channel ]🥇
@saqiicrypto · 3,019
#43
BINANCE FUTURE CRYPTO TRADING
@Crypto_Future_Free_Signals_Tradi · 44,025
#44
Infinity Signals
@Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 76,864
#45
TAMIL CRYPTO COACH👨‍💻
@tamilcryptocoach · 970
#46
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,516
#47
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,559
#48
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™
@arscryptocalls7 · 130,875
#49
Crypto Heaven®
@CryptoHeaven · 46,068
#50
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 192,465
#51
CRYPT0 Futures & Spot KING
@cryptolndustreisssi · 2,805
#52
FREE ME SIGNAL 💰
@freemesignal · 15,931
#53
Free me Jankari
@freemejankari · 48,337
#54
MEG VIP FREE ®
@megvipofficial · 4,194
#55
Feature earning
@feature_earning · 59,406
#56
Markhor Trading ™️
@Markhortrading · 3,970
#57
THE WOLF (CRYPTO)®
@thewolfcrypto_official · 34,064
#58
Open4profit
@open4profit · 79,369
#59
James Adrian | TRADING 🐋
@TraderAdrians · 3,413
#60
Binance_Doctor® ( Futures/Spot )
@BinanceDoctor · 3,001
#61
HGZY SIGNAL❖ʙᴅᴛ ᴋɪɴɢ
@HGZY_Tonmoy · 5,453
#62
Jusko Trader
@juskotraderreal · 80,772
#63
Crypto Notes
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 50,803
#64
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 313,603
#65
Crypto Freemium
@crypto_freemium · 11,743
#66
Crypto Tamizha ™
@CryptoTamizhaOfficial · 19,514
#67
Vaibhav Gupta💸💸
@vaibhavguptavg · 18,632
#68
🚀 INVESTMENT WITH Rohit🎯
@InvestmentWithRohit · 4,210
#69
Crypto update👨‍💻
@sdcryptoearningofficial · 145
#70
Signal Vhai Crypto
@SignalVhaiCryptoBD · 3,612
#71
PushpendraSinghOfficial
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,915
#72
The Rich Trader Reborn 🐋
@Therichtrader_Reborn · 26,020
#73
CRYPTO MONK
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,511
#74
Rose Premium Free
@rosepremiumfreeCF · 10,378
#75
Scalping_300%
@Scalping_300 · 43,615
#76
Bd🇧🇩 Best crypto Spot signal ™️
@BdBestCrypto · 617
#77
NEW AIRDROPS VERIFIED
@new_airdropss · 41,546
#78
Danish talk
@DanishYT2255 · 24,727
#79
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼𝗖𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗵
@CryptoCoachBangladesh · 22,048
#80
Crypto Mermaids
@CryptoMermaids · 33,031
#81
Crypto with Vishal Official
@CryptowithVishal_Official · 15,284
#82
CRYPTO (BEAST)™
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 42,839
#83
EBA Extra ( Crypto )
@EBAExtra · 17,642
#84
Crypto4U Signals💥
@crypto4uJ · 3,456
#85
Crypto Vaibhav (Ex - TF)
@cryptovaibhav · 26,935
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Binance Free Crypto Trading
@Free_Binance_Crypto_Future · 124,842
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
The Bitcoin
@TheBitcoin537 · 21,037
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
BINANCE FUTURE CRYPTO TRADING
@Crypto_Future_Free_Signals_Tradi · 44,025
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Trading Free Signals
@binance_Free_Crypto_Signal · 26,284
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
Jusko Trader
@juskotraderreal · 80,772
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Prediction Official” (@cryptoprediction), 33,001 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoprediction.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.