8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 11,822β11,881 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 00:37
11,829
-5
12 Aug 2026, 01:32
11,834
-15
10 Aug 2026, 22:17
11,849
-12
10 Aug 2026, 01:41
11,861
-2
9 Aug 2026, 05:02
11,863
-10
8 Aug 2026, 05:13
11,873
-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:45
11,874
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:37
11,874
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
4.46%
avg views Γ· 11,829 subscribers
Avg views / post
528
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
39 (4 August 2026 β 12 August 2026)
Views total
20,579
Reactions total
308
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
308 reactions across 28 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π₯
96
31.2%
π
86
27.9%
customΒ 5217449524410199951
47
15.3%
β€βπ₯
42
13.6%
π
22
7.14%
π
15
4.87%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 308reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 39 we hold a reading for Β· 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @CryptoSatRed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
JUST 1 DAY AGO, WE WARNED ABOUT THIS BEARISH TREND π»
$TUT was already showing serious selling pressure β and now you're seeing the result.
From around $0.140 β $0.0643
Thatβs roughly 54.1% DOWN in just one day.
π― COMPLETED TARGETS
β’ $0.10 β First Target with Profit: +28.6%
β’ $0.09 β Second Target with Profit: +35.7%
β’ Now price at $0.0643, profit at 54.1%.
The next major downside zone remains:
π― $0.05 β next β¦
π¨ BEARISH PRESSURE IS PLAYING OUT
As I said in yesterdayβs update, the key support levels were lost β and both Bitcoin and Ethereum are now facing stronger bearish pressure.
π» $ETH dropped to $1,866 after losing $1,885.
If you entered the short around $1,885:
Profit with 100Γ leverage: ~101%
And the downside may not be finished yet.
π» $BTC is struggling around $64.2Kβ$64.3K.
If BTC fails to reclaim this zonβ¦
π¨ Strategy Keeps Selling Bitcoins
Michael Saylorβs Strategy sold another 1,690 $BTC worth $108.6M last week, using the proceeds to repurchase $108.6M of STRC preferred stock.
Over the past 6 weeks, Strategy has sold 6,916 $BTC (~$429M).
Strategy hasnβt bought any Bitcoin for 7 weeks straight, but itβs been stacking up USD, now around $4.65B.
Current holdings: 840,447 $BTC
Average cost: ~$75,385/BTC
Strategy appeβ¦
$TUT is under serious selling pressure
The chart is turning ugly fast.
#Tutorial is now around $0.116, down nearly 28% today, with RSI deeply weak and MACD still pointing south.
The first target Iβm watching is $0.10.
Lose that cleanly, and $0.09 could come quickly β potentially within the next few hours if sellers keep pressing.
And if this selling pressure continues , I wouldn't be surprised to see $0.04β$0.05β¦
According to Standard Chartered, $LINK could potentially reach $200 by 2030, with Chainlink expected to gain from the expansion of tokenized assets to $4 trillion.
From Extreme Fear to Neutral β Bitcoin Is Fighting Back π
On July 1st, 2026, #Bitcoin dropped to around $57.8K.
At the same time, the Fear & Greed Index was only 18 β Extreme Fear π»
Bitcoin had returned to a price zone it last broke around September 17, 2024 β meaning it took approximately 652 days for $BTC to revisit that level.
Now look at where we are today π
β’ BITCOIN β $65.1K
β’ Fear & Greed β 40 β Neutral
β’β¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @CryptoSatRed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Gorilla Crypto @gorilla_crypto Β· 177,915 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here β alongside 82 others β read 12 August 2026
KING CRYPTO οΈ @KingCryptoCalls Β· 322,333 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here β alongside 80 others β read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ²ππ’πππ πππβ (@CryptoSatRed), 11,829 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoSatRed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
