Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 東哥Crypto JB唯一电报公开频道

Channel

東哥Crypto JB唯一电报公开频道

@JBcryptotrader881117

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,524subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611577835
TypeChannel
Username@JBcryptotrader881117
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/JBcryptotrader881117

Growth

5,5245,5795,551.57 August 2026 — 5,577 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,577 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,579 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,564 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,560 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,557 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,551 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,549 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,541 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,542 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,524 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,516–5,587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:385,524-18
2 Sept 2026, 14:275,542+1
27 Aug 2026, 13:445,541-8
24 Aug 2026, 17:245,549-2
20 Aug 2026, 22:165,551-6
17 Aug 2026, 22:285,557-3
14 Aug 2026, 21:525,560-4
11 Aug 2026, 13:545,564-15
8 Aug 2026, 09:435,579+2
7 Aug 2026, 12:015,577no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:505,577first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.19%
avg views ÷ 5,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
232
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held18 (31 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total463
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1275.0%
318.8%
👌16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC219 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BTC 空頭籌碼集中,巨鯨偏向空方,爆倉地圖顯示大量爆倉區集中在 BTC 63.1k、ETH 1845。主流幣表現弱勢。通過篩選器選出弱勢幣種有 AZTEC、BLUR、AT 等等,可持續關注!

👍3

Signed Kenjisrealm

11 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC244 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

原計劃是在1860附近做多 但昨日的下跌相當連續,且放出不俗的成交量 個人還在觀察,還沒入場做多,有觀點調整會再發出來

2

Signed J Crypto

10 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC311 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

關注回落後的止跌位置,大概在1860附近

👍2

Signed J Crypto

10 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC327 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BTC 多頭籌碼集中度下降、ETH 籌碼相對分散弱勢,巨鯨偏向平倉多單,爆倉地圖顯示大量爆倉區集中在兩側,BTC 66.7k 與 63.8k,ETH 則是在 1966 與 1897。 今日表現較強板塊有教育、工具板塊,8h 巨鯨進場的代幣有 FORM、ACT、BMT 等,可持續關注!

1

Signed Kenjisrealm

8 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC440 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

比特幣牛市的紅利可以說是越來越少了,上輪15000漲到126000美元,掐頭去尾能極限賺5-6倍 這一輪抄底成功,拿到牛市結束也就3倍左右 好好把握

👍4

Signed J Crypto

8 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC446 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

這要看好能上漲的理由是 1950阻力位已經測試四次,水平阻力測試次數較多,通常會突破 向上突破則會看到2050的阻力 多頭防守線在1830附近

Signed J Crypto

7 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC437 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

以太坊簡單也說一下 整體目前看是一個中繼型態,看好近期可以看到2050~2100美元

Signed J Crypto

7 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC384 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

比特幣短線糾結的到了65000~65500的阻力位 我的短線多單目前還拿著,看情況止盈,目前小浮盈8000多美金✅ 有任何交易問題的朋友,都歡迎私信我 我的電報🔽 https://t.me/Jbcrypto888

Signed J Crypto

7 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC373 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BTC 多頭籌碼集中度下降,ETH 籌碼轉空,巨鯨偏空操作。爆倉地圖結構下方依舊充滿高槓桿多單,主要集中在 BTC 63.3k、ETH 1871,今日非農來臨需要注意誘多殺多陷阱。 當前資金費率出現較高負資費的有 FWDI、ACE、KMNO 等幣,可以持續關注!

Signed Kenjisrealm

6 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC431 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BTC 多頭籌碼集中度繼續上升,ETH 則開始出現看跌背離信號,需要注意漲多拉回風險。爆倉地圖下方繼續積累高槓桿多單,交易員短線傾向做多。 根據 4h 巨鯨爆倉分佈圖顯示 CTSI、POWR、SUSHI 出現較明顯巨鯨動態,持續關注!

Signed Kenjisrealm

5 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC477 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BTC 多頭籌碼集中度續增、ETH 空頭籌碼集中度下降,巨鯨繼續偏多,可需要注意的是爆倉結構開始改變,大量高槓桿部位目前大量集中在下方,BTC 集中在 63k、ETH 在 1824 附近。 今日板塊表現較強的有跨鏈、工具與 DePIN 板塊,今日選出的強勢幣種有 ZAMA、UBER、TER 等,可持續關注!

Signed Kenjisrealm

4 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC476 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BTC 多頭籌碼集中、ETH 空頭籌碼集中度下降,巨鯨偏向平倉空單。爆倉地圖顯示大量爆倉區集中在 65k 與 62k,行情繼續在高槓桿區震盪為主。 8h 巨鯨警報分佈圖顯示 HFT、VIC、MOVE 等幣出現明顯巨鯨異動。可持續關注!

Signed Kenjisrealm

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @JBcryptotrader881117. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀
@btcyouliang · 28,994
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)
@bitebishuqin · 40,358
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
動區動趨 BlockTempo⚡️區塊鏈 加密貨幣新聞
@blocktemponews · 39,440
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
金十数据 闪电资讯
@jin10light · 30,011
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
三马哥币圈分析(币安或油管确认)
@sanmage · 31,263
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
互联网观察
@guanchahulw · 68,883
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“東哥Crypto JB唯一电报公开频道” (@JBcryptotrader881117), 5,524 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JBcryptotrader881117.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.