Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

金十数据

@jin10data

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,744subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693268862
TypeChannel
Username@jin10data
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jin10data

Growth

10,69710,74410,720.56 August 2026 — 10,697 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,704 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,719 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,736 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,734 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,740 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,744 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,690–10,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:4610,744+4
11 Aug 2026, 20:2210,740+6
10 Aug 2026, 23:4210,734-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:4110,736+17
9 Aug 2026, 02:5110,719+15
7 Aug 2026, 09:2210,704+7
6 Aug 2026, 11:4110,697no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:3610,697first reading

Engagement

320 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.64%
avg views ÷ 10,744 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.8
320 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
320
of 320 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 320 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held320 (6 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total22,006
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10,000
Links
18,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 320 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 320 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC4 viewsread 13 August 2026

【Meta已限制澳大利亚75万未成年社媒账户】金十数据8月13日讯,Meta Platforms表示,自去年开始遵守澳大利亚的青少年社交媒体禁令以来,公司已限制超过75万个被认为属于16岁以下人群的Instagram和Facebook账户在澳大利亚的访问权限。Meta周四表示,这一数字包括去年12月法律生效前公司移除的超过50万个账户,以及此后关闭的账户。其中包括46.2万个Instagram账户和29.4万个Facebook账户。这家总部位于加利福尼亚州门洛帕克的公司表示:“执法行动仍在持续,这些数字还会继续增长。”

13 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC46 viewsread 13 August 2026

巴拿马运河飙升16倍的“抢槽费”正在憋大招!但运费先涨,油价就一定会跟吗?目前第二道风险已不再隐蔽!盯住这三组信号,帮你更早看清真相>><font class="important-text"></font>

13 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC48 viewsread 13 August 2026

俄罗斯总统普京:强势的卢布对普通民众有利,但给出口企业带来了问题。

13 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC48 viewsread 13 August 2026
File

金十图示:2026年08月13日(周四)白银ETF持仓报告

13 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC52 viewsread 13 August 2026
File

金十图示:2026年08月13日(周四)黄金ETF持仓报告

13 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC51 viewsread 13 August 2026

市场消息:星链开始在越南接受卫星互联网服务的订单。

13 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC69 viewsread 13 August 2026

【联想集团:第一财季经调整权益持有人应占溢利同比增长176%】金十数据8月13日讯,联想集团(00992.HK)公告,集团第一财季收入同比增长43%,达269亿美元,创单季度新高;经调整权益持有人应占溢利同比增长176%至10.75亿美元,首次突破10亿美元大关。经调整净溢利率达4%。

13 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC68 viewsread 13 August 2026

【港股午评:恒指低开高走收涨0.07% 算力硬件方向集体领涨】金十数据8月13日讯,恒指今早低开高走,早盘低开逾150点后一路冲高,收复跌幅转涨,随后于水平面震荡。截至午间收盘,恒指收涨0.07%,报25457.33点,科指收涨0.30%,报4790.56点,恒指大市成交额达1320.28亿港元。盘面上,算力硬件方向表现强势,存储概念,光通信等细分领域领涨大盘,有色金属集体表现疲软,跌幅居前。创新药概念低开高走表现活跃。个股方面,剑桥科技(06166.HK)收涨15.37%,圣邦股份(03661.HK)收涨7.69%,石药集团(01093.HK)收涨5.76%,腾讯控股(00700.HK)绩后收跌3.81%,灵宝黄金(03330.HK)收跌678%,中国铝业(02600.HK)收跌5.01%。

13 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC63 viewsread 13 August 2026

联想集团(00992.HK):第一季度经调整权益持有人应占溢利同比增长176%,至10.75亿美元。

13 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC63 viewsread 13 August 2026

联想集团(00992.HK):第一季度集团收入同比增长43%,达269亿美元,创单季度新高。

Showing the 12 most recent of 320 posts we hold for @jin10data. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 216,585 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“金十数据” (@jin10data), 10,744 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jin10data.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.