Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Leo-加密貨幣頻道

Channel

Leo-加密貨幣頻道

@Xboshi1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,400subscribers

+193 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001720924085
TypeChannel
Username@Xboshi1
Description專注加密貨幣,現貨資訊, 合約點位分析,歡迎訂閱。 跟單/進群咨詢 助理: @bitgetlele7 Bitget註冊鏈接: https://partner.bitget.fit/bg/H7QYVS (邀請碼:bss8)
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Xboshi1

Growth

20,20620,40020,3037 August 2026 — 20,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,206 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,230 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,239 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,254 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,261 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,278 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,295 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,299 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,341 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,351 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,366 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,361 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,379 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,400 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net +193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,177–20,429 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 02:2620,400+21
20 Aug 2026, 20:5720,379+18
19 Aug 2026, 21:5320,361-5
18 Aug 2026, 18:5520,366+15
17 Aug 2026, 20:3720,351+10
16 Aug 2026, 22:0720,341+42
15 Aug 2026, 17:1820,299+4
14 Aug 2026, 07:5620,295+17
13 Aug 2026, 01:1820,278+17
12 Aug 2026, 01:4220,261+7
10 Aug 2026, 23:5120,254+15
10 Aug 2026, 01:2620,239+9
8 Aug 2026, 22:0820,230+24
7 Aug 2026, 21:4420,206-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:1620,207first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.66%
avg views ÷ 20,400 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,970
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held78 (3 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total153,770
Reactions total1,814
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,670
Videos
331
Links
640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,814 reactions across 78 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,16063.9%
44824.7%
❤‍🔥20611.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,814reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 78 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Xboshi1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC≈1,400 views22 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#ZRO 非常完美的形態,最高漲幅25%

👍155❤‍🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC≈2,010 views25 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#SOL 目前RSI已經進入高位超買,且小時有背離極限,價格遠離均線,有技術性回踩需求。 下方給到回踩可參考84-82附近介入多單,對應斐波拉契0.618附近,本輪拉升洗盤重要承接平台,良性回踩目標。

👍185❤‍🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC≈1,930 views37 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#ZRO 翻倍了,點點讚🙂

👍286❤‍🔥3

21 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,780 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#ZRO 4小時突破回踩頸線支撐,市價輕倉入多

👍125❤‍🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC≈1,830 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#KORU 設置TP1,剩餘倉位止盈參考23-25

👍143❤‍🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈2,120 views33 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#BTC 目前是非常強勢的突破行情,拉升近8000點區間,同時前一輪上漲伴隨大規模的空單清算,所以現在屬於多頭強勢,但短線過熱的階段。 4小時結構偏多,但不要追高,當前從7W關口突破,若回踩確認能成功變成頂底互換位,多頭結構會更健康。 目前短線重要支撐7W-69K,日內突破起漲點,重點關註回踩確認。其次是67K前面多次嘗試突破的頂底位置。 上方阻力則在74K-75K附近,前期的破位起跌點,不能有效突破75K可試空。 提示:本輪是消息面+逼空驅動,漲得快同時回調速度也快,不要被短期的行情改變風控原則。務必做好風控,守住本金是第一原則。

👍227❤‍🔥4

20 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,970 views24 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#KORU 小級別突破並回踩頂底轉換位支撐,市價輕倉入多

👍165❤‍🔥3

20 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC≈2,020 views28 reactionsread 23 August 2026

晚間大盤上漲復盤原因: 1.宏觀原因:美國擴大美債回購,美債收益率回落,風險資產情緒回暖。 2.監管預期利好:美股加密監管傳出友好信號,市場的風險偏好提升。 3.合約逼空放大漲幅:場內堆積大量空單,價格突破關鍵位置觸發空單止損平倉,被動買盤助推暴漲。 4.ETF回流:現貨ETF資金由流出專向淨流入,提供現貨支撐。 本輪屬於宏觀消息面利好+逼空共振形成的拉升,不是單純技術面的走牛。後續需要觀察ETF資金是否持續流入,以及美債收益率是否持續低位。

18👍8❤‍🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC≈1,990 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#ZEC 反轉上升三角直接突破了,就等頸線的回踩確認,大致在525附近

👍13❤‍🔥32

20 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC≈1,880 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#ETH 走三角突破上沿起漲,拉了超400點區間😆

11👍4❤‍🔥3

20 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC≈1,820 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026

比特幣這一波超預期了,主要還是受宏觀消息面影響,大盤直線拉升,稍後分析這一輪上漲原因。

👍135

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @Xboshi1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 227,675 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Leo-加密貨幣頻道” (@Xboshi1), 20,400 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xboshi1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.