Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анастасия Истинова

Channel

Анастасия Истинова

@istinovaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,142subscribers

-77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699039396
TypeChannel
Username@istinovaa
Description№ 4780421149 запись только здесь: https://t.me/istinova_bot
Created26 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/istinovaa

Growth

22,14222,21922,180.57 August 2026 — 22,219 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,219 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,218 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,216 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,211 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,207 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,199 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,198 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,193 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,189 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,182 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,185 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,183 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,179 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,171 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,169 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,157 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,143 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,142 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 23 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,130–22,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 01:1822,142-1
28 Aug 2026, 23:3722,143-14
28 Aug 2026, 00:4722,157-12
25 Aug 2026, 05:1322,169-2
24 Aug 2026, 01:3322,171-6
22 Aug 2026, 10:0322,177-2
20 Aug 2026, 21:5722,179-4
19 Aug 2026, 20:2322,183-2
18 Aug 2026, 18:2322,185+3
17 Aug 2026, 19:3422,182-7
16 Aug 2026, 19:3422,189-4
15 Aug 2026, 05:2522,193-5
13 Aug 2026, 18:2822,198-1
12 Aug 2026, 14:1522,199-8
11 Aug 2026, 16:5322,207-4
9 Aug 2026, 15:3122,211-5
8 Aug 2026, 13:1822,216-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:4022,218-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:4522,219no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:3622,219first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.3%
avg views ÷ 22,142 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,800
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held18 (10 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total55,190
Reactions total3,006
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
934
Videos
570
Links
285

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13m 33s
Average length
2m 16s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,638 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10,638100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @istinovaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈8,520 views574 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Интернет гудит: Гоар Аветисян отменяют за демонстрацию процесса «похудения» сына. Процесс «похудения» длится у мальчика уже не первый год, а главные средства в нём голод, насмешки и бесконечное разочарование матери в процессе «похудения» своего малолетнего сына. П.С. Бум курсов по «похудению» от блогеров, кольнувшихся пептидами, только набирает обороты. Как и глобальная пропаганда нездоровой худобы.

574

27 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈9,270 views1,080 reactions9 Starsread 30 August 2026

Я вернулась из отпуска!

1,080

7 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC≈20,300 views628 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

В эту пятницу мы с вами должны погрузиться во что-то интересное. На фоне крайне славянской премьеры славянского фильма Колобок, который никто не ждал, в моем поле зрения мелькнула звезда славянского психолога. Располагайтесь поудобнее. Позвольте себе расслабиться. Приготовьтесь к самым неожиданным сюжетным поворотам. Приятного просмотра!

628

29 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC≈24,200 views497 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Что там, кстати, с Сашей Спилберг? В чем скэндэл?

497

29 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC≈22,600 views883 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Что меня радует в современном мире, так это стабильность Полины Ниоли. Человек уже третий год не может установить себе календарь и заняться планированием. Третий год она за час бегает в панике и ищет какие-то платья в аренду, снова и снова возвращаясь к тому, чтобы отдать клиенту свой поношенный костюм. Меняется все: клиенты, мероприятия, время, но поношенные платья Полины - вот что действительно вечно.

883

27 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈15,900 views329 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Моя теория в том, что отношения номинально значились «свободными», до тех пор, пока один из них не начал пользоваться популярностью. Потом между ними появился кто-то, и тот, кому эти отношения приносили большую выгоду, топнул ножкой, так сказать. Так и случилась разлука, которая, как я полагаю, завершится страстным воссоединением. Из таких отношений так просто не уйти.

329

27 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC≈15,300 views304 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Знаю, многие следят за историей Сереги и Андрея Вадима. Презентую: вот он, разлучник!

304

23 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC≈20,500 views373 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Свобода или замкнутость? Беспризорничество и эксгибиционизм Анастасии Брагиной. https://youtu.be/U-JcEid5KWo

373

22 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC≈17,300 views852 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие мои, поддержите меня! Покупайте мой мерч! Я - самопровозглашенный амбассадор магниевой соли. Ссылка: Соль для ванн https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/858301109/detail.aspx?size=1291907930

852

17 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTC≈22,900 views272 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Очевидное стало очевидным.

272

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @istinovaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вавилонские письмена🦩
@sablezubiiytug · 61,191
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
Боярова
@boyarovayulya · 98,974
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026
Альберт Сафин
@safin4 · 68,483
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Соня Хромова
@khromovasonya · 74,350
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 August 2026
Алена Погребняк
@alenapogrebnyaktg · 77,671
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
Wine O’Clock
@time_forwine · 49,106
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 474,836
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анастасия Истинова” (@istinovaa), 22,142 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/istinovaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.