Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Darky || Дарки

Channel

Darky || Дарки

@sheisdarky

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,315subscribers

+140 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001428811915
TypeChannel
Username@sheisdarky
Descriptionhttps://sheisdarky.com тут 10 часовых видеоуроков про соцсети в 2026. Основное, что нужно знать для быстрого развития 🙂‍↕️💛 Реклама: и предложка @darkyrobot inst: sheisdarky
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sheisdarky

Growth

38,16938,32238,245.57 August 2026 — 38,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 38,169 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,186 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,196 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,194 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,196 subscribers13 August 2026 — 38,185 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,201 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,186 subscribers18 August 2026 — 38,196 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,195 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,192 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,196 subscribers22 August 2026 — 38,197 subscribers24 August 2026 — 38,279 subscribers25 August 2026 — 38,305 subscribers26 August 2026 — 38,312 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,319 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,322 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,315 subscribers38,3157 August 202628 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 21 days, net +140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,146–38,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 21:0838,315-7
28 Aug 2026, 00:2438,322+3
27 Aug 2026, 03:5538,319+7
26 Aug 2026, 03:2838,312+7
25 Aug 2026, 05:4838,305+26
24 Aug 2026, 04:4338,279+82
22 Aug 2026, 09:3638,197+1
20 Aug 2026, 23:1438,196+4
20 Aug 2026, 01:0638,192-3
19 Aug 2026, 03:4738,195-1
18 Aug 2026, 06:4238,196+10
17 Aug 2026, 09:4538,186-15
14 Aug 2026, 10:3538,201+16
13 Aug 2026, 00:3338,185-11
12 Aug 2026, 00:5338,196+2
10 Aug 2026, 22:0138,194-2
9 Aug 2026, 20:3538,196+10
8 Aug 2026, 18:5238,186+17
7 Aug 2026, 16:2638,169-6
7 Aug 2026, 09:3238,175first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.6%
avg views ÷ 38,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,700
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total217,350
Reactions total8,664
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,060
Videos
197
Links
334

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
40s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,314 reactions across 16 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,55940.3%
🔥2,27920.1%
👀6946.13%
💔6085.37%
😍5604.95%
💯4473.95%
🤣4323.82%
3483.08%
❤‍🔥2692.38%
🤯2392.11%
😱1301.15%
🙏1281.13%
👏1211.07%
😁710.628%
💋590.521%
🌚520.46%
🥰480.424%
💘370.327%
😎310.274%
280.247%
17 further kinds1741.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,314reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 16 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sheisdarky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈7,380 views759 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

А мы долго будем молчать, что Сергей Горошко взял на себя тяжелое бремя русского Джонни Деппа? Теперь-то придется соответствовать. Особо не знакома с творчеством актера, но увидела его в новом сериале «Большая фарма» и была как Ди Каприо из того мема, когда он увидел себя по телеку: «Это же молодой Депп». Я и не знала, что у нас тут есть такие красавчики. Вообще для актера это довольно непростая роль. Сам сериал ра

💔512160😁35🌚19🔥17🙊6🙉53

28 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈8,770 views305 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#русскийчай Актер Никита Кологривый является геем и с женой спал только с помощью специальных таблеток, они с ней расстались из-за его ориентации. Сейчас у него роман с его водителем Мишей. Знаю, что он трахался с массовкой сериала «Два Холма» в Краснодаре и он на тот момент женат был, Александрине он предложение еще в 17-ом году сделал на премьере фильма, она кольцом хвасталась, поженились в 20-том году после того

193👀80🥰16🔥54👏3💘3😘1

23 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈17,400 views722 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ребята привет )) https://youtu.be/AmbYdLKIv58 Это видео в двух частях, сегодня первая, а через неделю выйдет следом вторая Тут я рассказала про прошлое Малахова, с кем спал, чтобы попасть на телек, про его характер, про то как он встречался исключительно с богатыми женщинами постарше и как сформировал очень выгодный фиктивный брак с наследницей миллионера А во второй части мы будем говорить про его сутенерство,

447121🔥57😱44🍓16👏14👨‍💻12🥰4

18 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈22,300 views839 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#чай☕️ В субботу будет ролик про малахова :)

524🔥175👀94👏2012❤‍🔥4🌭3💘3

16 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC≈22,400 views473 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Вот, только вчера предположила это, а сегодня он уже официально сказал :)

315🔥69👏43😭22💘6😘6❤‍🔥5🎉5

15 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈23,600 views490 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Я могу поверить в то, что не все проекты Джорджины так успешны, как выглядит на первый взгляд. Но поверить в то, что она (имея 78 миллионов в инстаграме) без Роналду не проживет - нет. Она уже финансово независима от него, она уже миллионерша. Свадьба для неё, настоящая или нет, сейчас скорее вопрос престижа. А вот в то, что у них не все идеально и обложено контрактами - верю. “Они не могут позволить себе новые круп

295👀141😎2911❤‍🔥5💘3🤩31

15 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈15,300 views447 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

“Думаю, причина в том, что его карьера подходит к концу. Если бы он действительно серьезно к ней относился, он бы женился на ней еще до рождения детей или после первого ребенка...” Хе хе, ну что, друзья, на днях стало известно, что Криштиану Роналду и Джорджина Родригес всё-таки официально поженились)) Многие удивлены почему это произошло именно сейчас, с учетом того, что сама Джорджина говорила, что Роналду женитс

260👀14418😱15😁3👏2💘2❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈16,200 views162 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Хотите посмотреть на хирургию и косметологию глазами человека, который слишком долго на всё это смотрел? Хорошие результаты, плохие результаты, осложнения, хирурги, косметологи и периодическое «господи, что я только что увидела». Если вы тоже любите смотреть и анализировать, спорить и подозреваться подтяжки "звезд", разбираться в филлерах, и обсуждать неудачные жизненные решения — вам сюда. «Мерзкая кукла». Канал,

💋5739😱27🤗12🙉8🙊8🤯5🌚4

12 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈16,500 views575 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

#русскийчай Про Соловьева. Были на записи его передачи «К барьеру». Относится ко всем как к говну и к месту и не к месту упоминает о своём еврействе и следующей из этого исключительности. Особо запомнилось: в перерыве на рекламу моей подруге срочно надо было уйти со съёмок, так этот на всю студию в ее адрес: «Что, недержание, трусы обоссать боишься?» После записи некоторые подходили фоткаться и меня какая-то девушка

305🤯150👀85🔥145💘5😁4❤‍🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈15,200 views1,017 reactions4 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

#чай☕️ Upd. Извиняюсь если это пока выглядит странно. Я тренируюсь и ищу подходящий формат для рубрики

😍556🔥2167762👀31🤣31💅13🤝10

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈19,900 views670 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

“Я никогда не пойму ажиотаж вокруг этой девушки. Конечно, она беспроблемная и никому не мешает. Но то, как люди возводят её на этот абсурдный пьедестал, просто смешно и нелепо. Особенно если учесть, что её образы на красной дорожке — это всего лишь маркетинговый трюк. Эта девушка НЕ ​​заботится о моде, если вы посмотрите фотографии папарацци, где она в своей естественной среде обитания, вы увидите, что она пацанка, и

439💯147💔39👏14🙏65❤‍🔥5😈5

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈13,400 views481 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

“Я не уверен, что есть еще одна актриса нашего поколения, которая была бы такой же успешной, как Зендея”... Дэвид Гросс, голливудский аналитик. В этом году интернет конечно конкретно так взрывается от разных выходов Зендеи на красные дорожки :) Оно и ясно: 5 проектов один за другим, а у неё контракт на продвижение с каждым. А с другой стороны Зен предупреждала ещё какое-то время назад, что в 2026 её будет много. А

🔥298108🤯28🤣11🌚10💯98👏6

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sheisdarky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 544,129 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Джонни детка
@Johnny4ekak · 66,357
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
мистика
@missssstika · 76,493
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Бабкин Престол 2.0
@babkin_prestol · 67,237
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Darky || Дарки” (@sheisdarky), 38,315 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheisdarky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.