Channel
@ohhomeall
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,310subscribers
-94 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001374560116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ohhomeall |
| Description | я что-то нажала и так появился этот канал 💌 сотрудничество: [email protected] регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3Fkajb |
| Created | 23 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ohhomeall |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 02:00 | 23,310 | +20 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:45 | 23,290 | +198 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 01:47 | 23,092 | +51 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:10 | 23,041 | -10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:20 | 23,051 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:05 | 23,053 | -26 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 23,079 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 23,084 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:40 | 23,091 | -20 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:24 | 23,111 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:27 | 23,119 | -10 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 23,129 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 23,136 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:21 | 23,135 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 23,138 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 23,143 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:39 | 23,147 | +20 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:04 | 23,127 | +91 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 23,036 | +26 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 23,010 | first reading |
174 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 174 (1 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 502,070 |
| Reactions total | 53,072 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 02:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
159,803 reactions across 174 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71,455 | 44.7% | |
| custom 5346039870294894481 | 47,058 | 29.4% | |
| custom 5346274422753894743 | 20,676 | 12.9% | |
| custom 5346094390609746966 | 20,614 | 12.9% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 174 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159,803 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ohhomeall. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 174 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (3.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
много вопросов — где купить блокнотик «37 дел до конца года» я подумаю, что можно сделать .
❤576custom 5346039870294894481173custom 534609439060974696686custom 534627442275389474310
я готова пойти только на три передачи 1) что где когда так как я знаю абсолютно всё обо всём . я знаю кто где когда с кем в чём что и тд. 2) титаны я могу продемонстрировать как я задерживаю дыхание под водой + я могу отжиматься (на коленях) + я жму 12 кг от груди 3) поле чудес потому что я ОЧЕНЬ хочу выиграть ладу гранту
custom 5346039870294894481760❤276custom 5346094390609746966123custom 534627442275389474335
наконец-то меня заметили в большом шоу бизнесе
custom 5346094390609746966987custom 5346039870294894481327custom 5346274422753894743203❤63
всем привет. сейчас я делаю задания из блокнота . сняла об этом видео в тикток
❤587custom 5346039870294894481198custom 534627442275389474396custom 534609439060974696623
Posted without readable text
❤113custom 534609439060974696643custom 534603987029489448127custom 534627442275389474318
вы с каким вкусом любите блокноты?
❤511custom 5346039870294894481199custom 5346274422753894743102custom 534609439060974696628
«как ты можешь пускать кошку на стол?» погодите пока не увидете откуда я беру воду для супа
❤627custom 5346274422753894743323custom 5346039870294894481144custom 534609439060974696636
пишите что нарисовать на латте арте. я буду рисовать ваши пожелания. (не прям щас так как я уже выпила два кофе сегодня)
❤348custom 5346039870294894481110custom 534627442275389474366custom 534609439060974696628
учусь рисовать латте арт . купила питчер для этого . как вам. это я сама придумала такой рисунок. он много значит для меня
❤659custom 5346274422753894743197custom 534609439060974696697custom 534603987029489448122
в этом году просто какой-то офигенный кино-год. прям давно такого не было скажите. сходили недавно на фьорд . я люблю себастина стэна. жду не дождусь когда посмотрю "увидеть всё". еще прайм тайм с паттинсоном. а еще рассвет жатвы. а еще третья дюна. и еще чето я забыла. а еще сколько до этого было крутых фильмов в этом году. прям вайбы 2016 какие то . клас . офигенный оскар будет в этом году .
❤518custom 534627442275389474398custom 534609439060974696663custom 534603987029489448121
потратила сейчас 140 круток на митю и его сигну . ощущение такое как будто на кураже потратила все деньги в казино. прям встала из-за компа и как будто очнулась . все как в тумане.
custom 5346039870294894481595custom 5346274422753894743184❤121custom 534609439060974696634
Posted without readable text
custom 534609439060974696695custom 534603987029489448147❤32custom 534627442275389474316
Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @ohhomeall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
когда вы делаете все рабочие дела
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
если бы вы были оборотнем то в кого бы вы превращались каждое полнолуние
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“всемприветик это хомалон” (@ohhomeall), 23,310 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ohhomeall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.