Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

всемприветик это хомалон

@ohhomeall

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

23,341subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374560116
TypeChannel
Username@ohhomeall
Descriptionя что-то нажала и так появился этот канал 💌 если хотите рекламовое: @notmyagency регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3Fkajb
Created23 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ohhomeall

Growth

23,34123,40523,3737 August 2026 — 23,404 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,404 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,400 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,405 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,392 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,372 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,365 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,349 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,341 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,331–23,415 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:2723,341-8
13 Aug 2026, 01:4623,349-16
12 Aug 2026, 03:4323,365-7
11 Aug 2026, 01:3323,372-20
9 Aug 2026, 23:3423,392-13
8 Aug 2026, 19:3423,405+5
7 Aug 2026, 20:3823,400-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:1523,404no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:0423,404first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.6%
avg views ÷ 23,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,320
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total182,930
Reactions total18,617
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,020
Videos
558
Links
173

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18,617 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,87442.3%
custom 53460398702948944815,79831.1%
custom 53462744227538947433,13916.9%
custom 53460943906097469661,8069.70%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 22 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ohhomeall. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈5,410 views526 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Photo

это пост для обсуждения снежной для всех геншинозависимых как я как вам? что вы? и тд меня впечатлили вот эти медведе ) ахаха медведе 👍🏻

330custom 5346039870294894481116custom 534609439060974696659custom 534627442275389474321

12 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈6,290 views154 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 534609439060974696675custom 534603987029489448142custom 5346274422753894743289

11 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC≈7,190 views1,090 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

ребят у меня теперь есть свой КАБИНЕТ где я придумываю идеи и все такое. как кабинет стоматолога только кабинет хоманолонолога. в новом видео — придумываю рекламу для бренда гвоздей 😐 тикток ютуб надеюсь вам понравится

723custom 5346094390609746966193custom 5346274422753894743128custom 534603987029489448146

10 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈7,630 views995 reactionsread 14 August 2026

послезавтра в геншине выходит снежная … не знаю готовы ли вы к тому что этот канал превратится в фан страничку геншина… я готова… усердно сегодня и завтра работаю и доделываю все дела чтобы моей единственной задачей осталось играть в компьютер 🙏

623custom 5346094390609746966175custom 5346274422753894743142custom 534603987029489448155

9 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC≈8,070 views1,312 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

у нас все хобби совместные . где одна там и вторая.

custom 5346039870294894481836279custom 5346094390609746966156custom 534627442275389474341

9 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈8,300 views891 reactionsread 14 August 2026

я досмотрела офис и теперь без понятия, что мне смотреть пока кушаю...... больше ничего не имеет смысла.... посоветуйте сериал пожалуйста!! какой вот вам нравится или какой вы сейчас смотрите с превеликим удовольствием

570custom 5346274422753894743158custom 5346039870294894481118custom 534609439060974696645

8 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC≈9,110 views1,125 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Photo

мои последние покупки: 1) цифровое пианино…… абсолютный кризис первой четверти жизни но я хотела его весь последний год… 2) кнопочный стационарный телефон

custom 5346274422753894743707275custom 5346039870294894481119custom 534609439060974696624

8 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC≈8,290 views739 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5346039870294894481379custom 5346274422753894743164141custom 534609439060974696655

7 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈8,410 views495 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

напишите что-нибудь в комментариях: можете просто выговориться, поделиться чем-то радостным, а можете просто поболтать. расскажите, как проходит ваш день, что вас беспокоит в последнее время, или о вашем краше

custom 5346039870294894481291custom 534609439060974696697custom 53462744227538947436641

7 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈8,810 views1,413 reactions3 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

в этом месяце у меня в пинтересте аж 320 тыщ просмотров на фотках!! из них 300 тыщ — на фотках кени мой план сделать кеню мировой знаменитостью постепенно выполняется вот мои самые популярные фото в этом месяце (еще залетела фотка с судоку-свиданием и моей гитарой)

922custom 5346039870294894481308custom 5346274422753894743150custom 534609439060974696633

5 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈9,730 views378 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

одна из причин, почему я веду дневничок, — чтобы отслеживать свои мысли. у меня есть склонность все докручивать, додумывать за других, и по 10 раз прогонять одно и то же. в прошлом году я как раз поэтому пошла в кпт, где стала учиться не принимать все свои мысли за чистую монету (по-моему так говорится да) и больше обращать внимание на факты, а не на мои додумочки. конечно, это звучит легко на словах, но я до сих пор

custom 5346039870294894481200107custom 534609439060974696656custom 534627442275389474315

5 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈8,260 views299 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Poll

если бы вы были оборотнем то в кого бы вы превращались каждое полнолуние

  1. в лягушку11%
  2. в кофе машинку12%
  3. в канцелярский нож6%
  4. в клавиатуру5%
  5. в администратора этого телеграм канала19%
  6. я бы превращалась в бутерброд с плавленым сыром25%
  7. я боюсь такие темы обсуждать это страшно для меня о таком даже думать22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

150custom 534609439060974696662custom 534603987029489448160custom 534627442275389474327

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ohhomeall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTCAnonymous Poll2,990 voters approx.

если бы вы были оборотнем то в кого бы вы превращались каждое полнолуние

  1. в лягушку11%
  2. в кофе машинку12%
  3. в канцелярский нож6%
  4. в клавиатуру5%
  5. в администратора этого телеграм канала19%
  6. я бы превращалась в бутерброд с плавленым сыром25%
  7. я боюсь такие темы обсуждать это страшно для меня о таком даже думать22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 340,759 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“всемприветик это хомалон” (@ohhomeall), 23,341 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ohhomeall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.