⭕️ فوری/ تایید حمله آمریکا به سیریک هرمزگان 🔸به گزارش ایرنا، منابع رسمی اعلام کردند دقایقی قبل سیریک در استان هرمزگان مورد اصابت آمریکا قرار گرفت. 🔸بر اساس این گزارش اصابت صورت گرفته ماهیت نظامی دارد. ✅ @akhbare_fouri
👏108🤬51👍13🤣13🤮13❤9🔥8😡4

Channel
@akhbare_fouri
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,134,247subscribers
+99,704 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001143252256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @akhbare_fouri |
| Description | ﷽ 🔹️مهمترین اخبار ایران و جهان ♻️ بروز و سریع 🔴 رزرو تبلیغات: 👇👇👇 @akhbar_fouri_ad #رسانهای_مستقل #با_حضور_شخصیتهای_برجسته استفاده از لوگوی اخبار فوری پیگرد قانونی دارد💯 🌍اخبار فوری در اینستاگرام👇 https://instagram.com/fouri_akhbar |
| Created | 24 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/akhbare_fouri |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @akhbare_fouri/298388 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC | @km_ap/2218964 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC | 0.98 | 34 minutes |
| @akhbare_fouri/302089 · this entry6 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC | @km_ap/2267216 Sept 2026, 09:55 UTC | 0.98 | 7 minutes |
| @akhbare_fouri/303238 · this entry15 Sept 2026, 16:28 UTC | @km_ap/22809115 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC | 0.97 | 58 minutes |
| @akhbare_fouri/300497 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC | @km_ap/22489625 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC | 0.96 | 44 minutes |
| @km_ap/22076228 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC | @akhbare_fouri/297534 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 19:12 UTC | 0.95 | under a minute |
| @akhbare_fouri/305290 · this entry1 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC | @km_ap/2302241 Oct 2026, 16:20 UTC | 0.94 | 19 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @km_ap | 527 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 11 minutes | this entry (492–35) |
| @khabarha_fouri | 519 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 5 minutes | this entry (437–82) |
| @khabar_brouz | 371 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | under a minute | this entry (369–2) |
| @kotah_fouri | 344 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.94 | under a minute | this entry (341–3) |
| @akhbr_fourii | 233 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 10 minutes | this entry (194–39) |
| @kabar_news | 218 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.94 | 13 minutes | this entry (198–20) |
| @fouri_jahan | 188 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 7 minutes | this entry (164–24) |
| @currency_gold | 166 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | under a minute | this entry (131–35) |
| @kh_mx | 144 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 10 minutes | this entry (133–11) |
| @ne_wg | 142 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.94 | 16 minutes | this entry (123–19) |
| @fouri_havades | 137 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 7 minutes | this entry (123–14) |
| @didanihatv1 | 127 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 38 minutes | this entry (126–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1,611 of the 1,831 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7,406 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @akhbare_fouri — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
On 7 of the 2,011 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0099 reactions per view.
| Post | Over | Views | Reactions | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /30856628 Oct 2026, 19:15 UTC | 5.4 hours | 58,200 → 73,200at least +14,900 | 321 → 353at most +33 | +147.0 |
| /3094224 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC | 55 minutes | 36,700 → 44,900at least +8,100 | 428 → 446at most +19 | +79.9 |
| /3095635 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC | 30 minutes | 23,500 → 28,600at least +5,000 | 378 → 389at most +12 | +49.3 |
| /3097126 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC | 34 minutes | 24,400 → 33,600at least +9,100 | 126 → 145at most +20 | +89.8 |
| /3098587 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC | 1.5 hours | 36,700 → 44,900at least +8,100 | 335 → 342at most +8 | +79.9 |
| /3098637 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC | 34 minutes | 30,600 → 35,700at least +5,000 | 369 → 380at most +12 | +49.3 |
| /3098827 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC | 34 minutes | 29,600 → 35,800at least +6,100 | 394 → 404at most +11 | +60.2 |
Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source · view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 23:16 | 1,134,247 | -10,942 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 23:57 | 1,145,189 | -4,584 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:47 | 1,149,773 | -4,382 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:10 | 1,154,155 | -5,164 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:01 | 1,159,319 | -2,907 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 1,162,226 | -2,302 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:19 | 1,164,528 | -1,684 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:36 | 1,166,212 | -228 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:05 | 1,166,440 | -861 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:36 | 1,167,301 | +3,842 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 1,163,459 | +53,437 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 1,110,022 | +54,189 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 1,055,833 | +7,408 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:31 | 1,048,425 | +31,341 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 1,017,084 | -5,006 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 1,022,090 | -10,293 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 1,032,383 | -4,017 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:31 | 1,036,400 | -8,522 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 1,044,922 | -8,257 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 1,053,179 | first reading |
11,458 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 275 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11,458 (27 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 207,863,041 |
| Reactions total | 2,404,182 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 19:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 375 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 3,400 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (746 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 1,889 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 1.6 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 37.5% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 83.6% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 60,800 views — 5.36% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 72,255).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /31067612 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC | 112 minutes – 12 minutes old | 15,400 views ~223 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /31067512 Nov 2026, 18:42 UTC | 23 minutes – 38 minutes old | 28,600 views ~156 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 18 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /31067412 Nov 2026, 18:41 UTC | 24 minutes – 39 minutes old | 29,600 views ~113 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 18 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /31067312 Nov 2026, 18:40 UTC | 24 minutes – 39 minutes old | 28,600 views ~116 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 19 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /31067212 Nov 2026, 18:31 UTC | 214 minutes – 49 minutes old | 31,700 views ~191 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 22 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /31067112 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC | 224 minutes – 59 minutes old | 34,700 views ~225 reactions | 60 minutes: 34,700 | not yet at 24h | 26 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /31067012 Nov 2026, 18:12 UTC | 233 minutes – 68 minutes old | 35,700 views ~211 reactions | 60 minutes: 32,774 interp. | not yet at 24h | 33 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /31066912 Nov 2026, 18:07 UTC | 238 minutes – 73 minutes old | 36,800 views ~307 reactions | 60 minutes: 32,247 interp. | not yet at 24h | 38 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
678,363 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 143,845 | 21.2% | |
| 🤮 | 121,428 | 17.9% | |
| ❤ | 105,173 | 15.5% | |
| 🤬 | 102,162 | 15.1% | |
| 🤣 | 79,175 | 11.7% | |
| 👎 | 52,023 | 7.67% | |
| 🔥 | 18,843 | 2.78% | |
| 👏 | 17,128 | 2.52% | |
| 💔 | 12,021 | 1.77% | |
| 😢 | 3,286 | 0.484% | |
| 😍 | 2,439 | 0.36% | |
| 😱 | 2,149 | 0.317% | |
| 😡 | 2,132 | 0.314% | |
| 🥰 | 1,937 | 0.286% | |
| 😐 | 1,780 | 0.262% | |
| 🥴 | 1,562 | 0.23% | |
| 🙏 | 1,509 | 0.222% | |
| 🤔 | 1,373 | 0.202% | |
| 🤪 | 1,235 | 0.182% | |
| 🤯 | 1,199 | 0.177% | |
| 26 further kinds | 5,964 | 0.879% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 678,363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 November 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @akhbare_fouri. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 November 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 197 of 3,482 posts held from the last 30 days (5.66%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⭕️ فوری/ تایید حمله آمریکا به سیریک هرمزگان 🔸به گزارش ایرنا، منابع رسمی اعلام کردند دقایقی قبل سیریک در استان هرمزگان مورد اصابت آمریکا قرار گرفت. 🔸بر اساس این گزارش اصابت صورت گرفته ماهیت نظامی دارد. ✅ @akhbare_fouri
👏108🤬51👍13🤣13🤮13❤9🔥8😡4
شنیده شدن صدای انفجار در سیریک 🔸اهالی سیریک در شرق استان هرمزگان طی ساعات گذشته در چند مقطع صدای انفجار شنیدند. 🔸هنوز ماهیت این انفجارها مشخص نیست اما برخی منابع این صداها را ناشی از شلیک هشدار به سمت کشتیهای متخلف عنوان کردهاند. 🔸ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران نیز ساعاتی پیش از انفجار ۲ نفتکش متخلف در تنگه هرمز خبر داده بود. 🔹اخبار تکمیلی متعاقبا اعلام میشود./فارس ✅ @akhbare_fouri
🤣56👍45❤19🔥12🤬11🥱5👎3😢3
⭕️ فارس: اهالی سیریک طی ساعات گذشته چندین مرتبه صدای انفجار را شنیدند ✅ @akhbare_fouri
😱41👍26🔥15🤬11❤6👎5🤓3🤣3
💢 هیچ تصمیمی مبنی بر تعطیلی مدارس استانهای کشور در روز شنبه گرفته نشده …
🤮63🤔22🤬14👍8❤4🤣3👎2
💢والاستریتژورنال: دموکراتها پس از پیروزی در انتخابات میاندورهای، قصد دارند تلاش دونالد ترامپ برای تغییر رسمی نام وزارت دفاع آمریکا به «وزارت جنگ» را متوقف کنند 🔸پیشنهاد تغییر نام در هر دو نسخه مجلس نمایندگان و سنا از لایحه سالانه سیاستگذاری دفاعی گنجانده شده است، اما دموکراتها در جریان مذاکرات برای حذف این بند تلاش میکنند. ✅ @akhbare_fouri
🤮107❤35🤣15🤬9👍8👏6🥴6👎4
🎥نمای باشکوه قلهی دماوند از قله توچال در یه هوای بسیار سرد، امروز ✅ @akhbare_fouri
❤189👍24🔥8😘4
⭕️منابع عربی از شنیده شدن صدای چند انفجار در منطقه هرمز و در نزدیکی سیریک خبر می دهند ✅ @akhbare_fouri
🔥137🤣28❤18👍13👎8🥱3👏2🤔1
⭕️حملهیمن به شرکت آرامکو در ریاض 🔸سرتیپ یحیی سریع سخنگوی نیروهای مسلح یمن از حملهی پهپادی موفق به شرکت آرامکو در پایتخت عربستان سعودی خبر داد. ✅ @akhbare_fouri
👏144🤮89❤20🔥14👎13👍12🤣7🤬4
🚨 #غیررسمی حمله ایران برای شکستن محاصره 🔸 دقایقی پیش گزارشی از شلیک بیش از ۱۰ موشک ضدکشتی از منطقه بندرعباس به سمت ناوهای آمریکایی در دریای عمان ✅ @akhbare_fouri
🤣345🔥172❤64👏53👍22🤮14👎6😱5
ترامپ: از رهبر مجلس سنا میخواهم برای تصویب بودجه اضافی ۳۵۰ میلیارد دلاری برای پنتاگون فورا اقدام کند ✅ @akhbare_fouri
❤254🤮172👍25👎24🤬20👏9🔥8🤔3
🎥یکی از فرماندهان پرتاب موشک: خیلی از رونماییها را هنوز انجام ندادهایم و قرار است در صحنۀ عمل به نمایش بگذاریم 🔸آمادگی ما نسبت به قبل خیلی بیشتر شده. موشکهای جدید با نسل جدید و سرِ شدیدالانفجارتر و بالاتر از آن چیزی که فکر میکنند را هنوز رونمایی نکردیم. ✅ @akhbare_fouri
🤣333❤171🤮76👍22🔥19👎3🤬3🍓2
دیدار نتانیاهو و آیزنکوت پس از دو ساعت به پایان رسید بیانیه مشترک نتانیاهو و آیزنکوت: 🔸این جلسه آیزنکوت در جریان چالشهای امنیتی و دیپلماتیکِ کنونیِ پیشِ روی اسرائیل قرار گرفت. 🔸دو طرف توافق کردند که در صورت نیاز، یکدیگر را در جریان تحولات قرار دهند. ✅ @akhbare_fouri
👍107🤣85❤36🤮28👎15🔥8🤷2🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 11,458 posts we hold for @akhbare_fouri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@akhbare_fouri edited 102 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 17 posts on @akhbare_fouri as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 100 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 131 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 327 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
5 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار فوری / مهم 🔖” (@akhbare_fouri), 1,134,247 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akhbare_fouri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.