Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Революция в Иране

@Iran_Revolutionn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,216subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001809632446
TypeChannel
Username@Iran_Revolutionn
Created6 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Iran_Revolutionn

Growth

15,21615,29115,253.56 August 2026 — 15,291 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,278 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,275 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,265 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,254 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,249 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,235 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,231 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,216 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,205–15,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:0515,216-15
12 Aug 2026, 15:5415,231-4
11 Aug 2026, 18:2415,235-14
10 Aug 2026, 19:2815,249-5
9 Aug 2026, 21:5215,254-11
9 Aug 2026, 00:5415,265-10
7 Aug 2026, 23:3215,275-3
7 Aug 2026, 01:4515,278-13
6 Aug 2026, 02:4715,291first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 15,216 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,330
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held29 (28 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total183,650
Reactions total6,968
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 06s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,385 reactions across 27 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1,14918.0%
💯1,11017.4%
🤡6159.63%
custom 49360675723961970134727.39%
custom 51975000326804959334156.50%
👍3775.90%
😁3545.54%
custom 52647820955316616632654.15%
2263.54%
💔2153.37%
🔥2063.23%
😢1782.79%
🤔1352.11%
🤣1292.02%
🤮1221.91%
🤯791.24%
💩661.03%
🥴390.611%
🖕310.486%
🙏290.454%
20 further kinds1732.71%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,968reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 29 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Iran_Revolutionn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈4,450 views144 reactionsread 13 August 2026

КСИР выпустил ракеты в сторону Ормузкого пролива

🤬86🥴21🔥9👀8😁5🙏5custom 52647820955316616634👏2

11 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈4,320 views123 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔴Новые назначения верховного лидера Исламской Республики Иран меняют баланс сил в правящей элите Лидер Исламской Республики Моджтаба Хаменеи недавно своими указами назначил ряд людей на ключевые должности в Иране. Назначения военных были ожидаемыми. Назначенный на пост командующего КСИР генерал Вахиди фактически уже давно руководил этой организацией, а указ о его назначении был лишь формальностью. То же самое касае

custom 493606757239619701351👍26custom 5197500032680495933218🤡5😡5custom 52647820955316616634💩2

10 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC≈3,860 views217 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Назначенный президентом Пезешкияном секретарь Высшего совета национальной безопасности Ирана, генерал КСИР Мохсен Резаи, в интервью, снятом в 2015 году, говорит: «Если американцы нападут на Иран, я уверяю их, что в первую неделю войны мы возьмём в заложники 1000 американцев и потребуем за освобождение каждого из них несколько миллиардов долларов. В таком случае мы решим многие наши экономические проблемы».

🤡127🤣62😁8💊7🔥3👍2👏2🖕2

10 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC≈3,780 views110 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Кто назначил генерала КСИР Мохсена Резаи секретарём Высшего совета национальной безопасности Ирана? Вижу, многие по ошибке пишут, что генерал Резаи был назначен на пост секретаря Совбеза верховным лидером Моджтабой Хаменеи. Это не так! Моджтаба Хаменеи в своём указе пишет, что назначает генерала Резаи своим представителем в Совете безопасности. У верховного лидера всегда есть 1–2 представителя в Совбезе, но эти пре

💯84👍13🤡5custom 519750003268049593332👎1👻1🥱1

10 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈3,770 views229 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇦Исмаил Багаи, спикер Министерства иностранных дел Исламской Республики Иран, комментируя слова Владимира Зеленского об атаке на иранское судно сказал: «Мы предельно ясно изложили свою позицию и не были убеждены утверждениями украинской стороны о том, что атака была непреднамеренной». Багаи добавил: «Если Украина не компенсирует ущерб, нанесённый атакой на иранское судно, мы сами предпримем ответные меры».

🤡100custom 526478209553166166352🖕28💩24custom 519750003268049593395👍4👻4

9 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC≈6,790 views154 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

⚠️Офис нового верховного лидера Исламской Республики Иран опубликовал указ Моджтабы Хаменеи, в котором он назначил генерала КСИР Мохсена Резаи представителем верховного лидера в Высшем совете национальной безопасности. Кто такой Мохсен Резаи? До революции 1979 года Резаи был членом группировки «Мансурун», которая вела вооружённую борьбу против шаха. «Мансурун» была одной из семи организаций, на базе которых после р

🤬87💯26👍11🤡10💩7👏4👻4🥰2

8 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC≈10,000 views270 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

В иранском сегменте социальной сети X — новая волна антироссийских постов и мемов. Это связано с поддержкой Россией иранского режима, исторической враждой России по отношению к Ирану и вмешательством России во внутренние дела Ирана. Но эта волна антироссийских постов началась с новости о несправедливом разделе Каспийского моря между странами, расположенными на его берегах. Дело в том, что до распада СССР Иран конт

custom 4936067572396197013119custom 526478209553166166344custom 519750003268049593342🔥17😁1410🤡7👏5

7 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC≈5,990 views224 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Моссад отстранил двух высокопоставленных офицеров, работавших над иранским направлением. Если это решение связано с идиотскими идеями поддержки маргинальных курдских террористов и сепаратистов в Ираке и назначения Ахмадинежада новым лидером Ирана, то в таком случае я поздравляю Моссад. Тут надо было либо этим офицерам запретить есть грибы 🍄, либо отстранить их.

💯107🤣42custom 519750003268049593333🤔20🤡9🤷‍♂3😁3custom 52647820955316616633

7 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈5,220 views180 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @orientalexpress

⚡ Турция, Саудовская Аравия и Пакистан подпишут 7 августа соглашение о совместной обороне. Об этом сообщает Reuters, со ссылкой на источники. Подробности соглашения пока не разглашаются. #турция #пакистан #саудовскаяаравия 🔔Подписывайтесь на канал Oriental Express 🚂

🤮93👍26🤔22🥱17🤬84😁4🤣3

6 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈5,910 views297 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️Трамп вакцинирует иранский режим Вакцина — это ослабленный вирус, который не способен причинить человеку серьезный вред, но заставляет иммунную систему приспособиться к настоящему вирусу. Полумеры Трампа в отношении иранского режима работают как вакцина, которая помогает режиму приспосабливаться к новым угрозам. Не доведенная до конца 12-дневная война дала режиму время и возможность подготовиться к закрытию Орму

💯215👍448🤷‍♂8custom 51975000326804959337🤯6🤣4🤡3

4 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈5,550 views210 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

В Киеве погода как у трампа настроение

😁132custom 526478209553166166351👍11custom 51975000326804959337🔥5🙏2💯1🤡1

4 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈6,450 views144 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Сильный пожар в промышленном городке Шамсабад к югу от Тегерана.

🔥107👍18🤔11custom 51975000326804959337😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Iran_Revolutionn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 63,774 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Революция в Иране” (@Iran_Revolutionn), 15,216 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iran_Revolutionn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.