Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

sage park 투자공부방

@pdh568

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,861subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001306595667
TypeChannel
Username@pdh568
Created27 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pdh568

Growth

1,8611,8631,8627 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,861–1,863 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:141,861-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:001,863no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:571,863first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.9%
avg views ÷ 1,861 subscribers
Avg views / post
705
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total14,103
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC48 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @corevaluePhoto

코스닥 시가총액과 신용잔고 추이. 지수가 아닌 시총인데도 2020년 수준으로 후퇴. 신용잔고는 2019년으로 후퇴. 타임머신 좀 그만타고 싶은 코스닥

5 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC129 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @akacommodityPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

5 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC98 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchinaPhoto

•BDI운임지수 3,000pt 돌파 (+4.33%) >波罗的海干散货运价指数涨4.33%,至3063点。 (来自华尔街见闻)

5 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC68 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @corevalue

https://www.edaily.co.kr/News/Read?newsId=06172966645544040&mediaCodeNo=257&OutLnkChk=Y 이번 세제개편 양이 상당하네요 세법을 개누더기를 만들어놔서 집 한번 갈아탈 때도 각종 경우의 수의 고려해야 합니다. 이젠 세무사도 틀리지 않을 자신이 없을거 같습니다. 국민이 법에 대해 잘 몰라도 편안하게 살 수 있게 하는게 최고의 정치입니다. 개편안 상세본이 237페이지인데 두 글자로 요약하면 ‘증세’이고 한 줄로 요약하면 ‘집 있는 사람 괴롭히기’ 입니다. 다주택자 규제를 완전 철폐하면 민간공급이 늘어나서 전월세 가격은 내려가고 똘똘한 한채도 완화됩니다. 근데 반대로 집 있는 사람을 악마화하면서 정책이 산으로 가고 있습니다.

5 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC115 viewsread 7 August 2026

소음과 무수한 정보가 넘처나는 시대에 필요한 말이군요 :)

5 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC106 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @banjang9Photo

날마다 더하는 게 아니라 날마다 덜어내는 것이다. 본질이 아닌 건 가차 없이 베어내라. 깨달음을 얻는다는 건 '진정한' 삶을 흐리는 모든 걸 없애는 일이다. -이소룡, <물이 되어라, 친구여>-

4 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC114 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😱 코스피 공포·탐욕 지수 (YTD) 현재 13점 · 극도의 공포 2026-08-04 · 추이 비교용 6지표 재구성(등락폭 제외)

4 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC157 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @banjang9Photo

언제나 잃을 것이 있다. 이미 많은 것들이 사라졌다고 믿는 순간에조차 삶을 지탱하는 최후의 것들이 있다. 다르게 말하면, 언제나 무언가를 가지고 있다. -이다혜, <오래된 세계의 농담>-

31 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC330 viewsread 7 August 2026

나 살려라.. 다시는 주식 안한다 하고 다시 후회하는 개인들 ㅎㅎㅎ 역사는 늘 반복된다. 해아래 새것은 없다. 쉽게 버는 돈은 없다. 🤣

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pdh568. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sage park 투자공부방” (@pdh568), 1,861 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pdh568.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.