Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Антон Поляков (Poly_invest)

Channel

Антон Поляков (Poly_invest)

@Polyakov_Ant

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,974subscribers

-80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001552060878
TypeChannel
Username@Polyakov_Ant
DescriptionВсе доходы от инвестиций. Портфельный управляющий фондом для КВАЛ инвесторов. Информация по фонду: https://funds.finam.ru/ipif/polyakov-invest/ Все мои стратегии и информация обо мне: https://antonpolyakov.ru/
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Polyakov_Ant

Growth

15,97416,05416,0146 August 2026 — 16,054 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,044 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,038 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,031 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,027 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,022 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,027 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,022 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,015 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,006 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,003 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,999 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,995 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,980 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,974 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,962–16,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 16:2415,974-6
20 Aug 2026, 15:4415,980-15
19 Aug 2026, 14:1215,995-4
18 Aug 2026, 16:3315,999-4
17 Aug 2026, 16:4816,003-3
16 Aug 2026, 08:2516,006-9
14 Aug 2026, 20:5616,015-7
13 Aug 2026, 15:2816,022-5
12 Aug 2026, 12:0916,027+5
10 Aug 2026, 14:2516,022-5
9 Aug 2026, 16:2416,027-4
8 Aug 2026, 19:2416,031-7
7 Aug 2026, 18:4016,038-6
6 Aug 2026, 15:3016,044-10
6 Aug 2026, 08:4816,054first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.5%
avg views ÷ 15,974 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,910
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held49 (29 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total191,540
Reactions total2,371
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,030
Videos
200
Links
911

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,282 reactions across 46 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,18551.9%
😁35815.7%
32014.0%
😭813.55%
🔥723.16%
🤣562.45%
👎522.28%
🤝271.18%
🥴200.876%
😢180.789%
👌150.657%
👏150.657%
💯120.526%
🗿120.526%
😐100.438%
🐳60.263%
🤬50.219%
😱40.175%
❤‍🔥30.131%
🤔30.131%
6 further kinds80.351%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,371reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Polyakov_Ant. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC≈2,820 views151 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Горит первый склад ozon. Вы знаете как я относился к компании. Мне очень жаль. Держал компанию много лет. Акции на отскоке я продал везде. Поэтому я не нахожусь в акциях никаких компаний, риск не только экономический но и прямой физический. Акции росли последние недели, это подтверждение не адекватности рынка. Будьте осторожны. С мая мы находимся в глубоком кризисе, который ухудшается.

😭81🤝24👌1311🤬5🗿4😱4👍3

21 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈3,000 views56 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Видео уже на канале. Тема: "Два сценария для России — что теперь будет с вашими деньгами" https://youtu.be/sjxPPtK0Euo Важные ссылки: boosty Доступ к ИИС + ранний доступ ко всем видео: clck.ru/3PQqwc Информация о моем фонде ИПИФ "Поляков инвестиции": https://clck.ru/3Tgaxf 00:00 О чём сегодня поговорим? 00:38 Что изменилось на рынке? 02:40 Долговой рынок не подтверждает эйфорию 09:15 Кто покупает ОФЗ и поче

👍397👏4👎3🔥3

21 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈2,720 views15 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍8🔥4👎2👨‍💻1

21 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈2,630 views40 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Большой рынок без явного победителя, инвестиционный кейс частной медицины Российская частная медицина уже давно перестала быть историей исключительно про премиальные клиники. За 5 лет рынок вырос более чем вдвое с 1,139 трлн рублей в 2020 году до 2,387 трлн в 2025 при среднем темпе в 15,9%/год. Для сравнения, весь рынок медицинских услуг рос на 10,3% в год за тот же период. В итоге доля коммерческой медицины увеличи

👍2710🐳1👎1😁1

20 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,810 views55 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁30🤣19💯2🔥2🥴2

20 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,710 views48 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Топ-5 НЕОЧЕВИДНЫХ ошибок начинающего инвестора, которые можно не заметить. Большинство новичков боятся совсем не того, что надо. Все привыкли, что главная опасность купить плохую акцию или не угадать момент входа. На деле первые серьезные потери часто появляются откуда не ждешь. Из решений, которые в момент покупки кажутся вполне разумными. Именно поэтому они и опасны! #ПолиГрамотность Многие покупают не актив, а

👍3611👎1

19 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈3,310 views47 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, здравствуйте! Я сделал отдельную закрытую группу только для пайщиков фонда ИПИФ «Поляков Инвестиции». Чтобы попасть в группу, необходимо пройти верификацию через Telegram-бота. Бот сверяет предоставленные вами данные с данными пайщиков фонда и пропускает в группу только действующих пайщиков. Ссылка на БОТа: @POLY_FINPLAN_BOT Очень важно при верификации указывать именно те данные, которые вы предоставляли

🔥26👍98👎2🤝2

19 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈3,160 views18 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍13👎32

19 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈3,090 views43 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Дефицит ликвидности достиг 2,7 трлн рублей! Есть ли повод для беспокойства? Структурный дефицит ликвидности российской банковской системы достиг 2,708 трлн рублей против 587 млрд рублей в начале года. За 7,5 месяцев показатель увеличился более чем на 2 трлн. На первый взгляд цифра выглядит тревожно и можно словить панику от этой новости, ошибочно решив, что банкам становится неоткуда брать деньги, растут проблемы с

👍355👎3

18 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈3,200 views54 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁455🥴4

18 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈3,250 views52 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Цена упала, но стал ли бизнес привлекательней? Когда акция падает на 20–30%, кажется, что рынок уже дал хорошую скидку. Но цена может снизиться еще сильнее, а короткий отскок легко принять за начало восстановления. Поэтому само падение котировок слабый аргумент для покупки. Гораздо важнее понять, стала ли компания дешевой относительно тех денег, которые она способна заработать в будущем? #ПолиГрамотность Первое, н

👍419👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @Polyakov_Ant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 552,953 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Антон Поляков (Poly_invest)” (@Polyakov_Ant), 15,974 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Polyakov_Ant.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.