Канал по облигациям Кирилла Захарова
Финансовый риск-менеджер (FRM)
Магистр количественных финансов Fordham University 🇺🇸
https://zakharovinvest.ru
https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/678797828e552d6b54be1269
Сотрудничество и вопросы:
@pr_zakharov
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,587–25,777 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 07:19
25,609
-12
15 Sept 2026, 08:38
25,621
-3
13 Sept 2026, 13:57
25,624
-9
11 Sept 2026, 17:21
25,633
-11
9 Sept 2026, 04:40
25,644
-17
5 Sept 2026, 21:02
25,661
-13
3 Sept 2026, 21:41
25,674
-9
2 Sept 2026, 12:26
25,683
-18
1 Sept 2026, 11:34
25,701
-1
31 Aug 2026, 08:24
25,702
-9
30 Aug 2026, 10:16
25,711
-2
29 Aug 2026, 10:08
25,713
-12
28 Aug 2026, 12:16
25,725
-19
27 Aug 2026, 09:29
25,744
-5
26 Aug 2026, 11:33
25,749
+1
25 Aug 2026, 14:25
25,748
-2
24 Aug 2026, 13:54
25,750
-5
22 Aug 2026, 21:37
25,755
+8
21 Aug 2026, 10:38
25,747
+34
20 Aug 2026, 13:23
25,713
first reading
Engagement
117 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.9%
avg views ÷ 25,609 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,880
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 117 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
117 (27 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
405,930
Reactions total
6,274
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 06:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,010
Videos
≈64
Links
≈1,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,942 reactions across 116 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,407
34.1%
😁
2,235
17.3%
custom 5305598312206843926
2,041
15.8%
🔥
1,093
8.45%
💯
838
6.48%
🤯
611
4.72%
❤
467
3.61%
👀
446
3.45%
😭
265
2.05%
🗿
259
2.00%
🍾
108
0.834%
😡
66
0.51%
🤷♂
63
0.487%
😎
28
0.216%
⚡
15
0.116%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,942 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 116 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zakharov_risk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 117 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
АО "Полипласт" выкупило по оферте 250 тыс. облигаций серии П02-БО-07 по цене 100% от номинала, сообщил эмитент на ленте раскрытия информации.
Объем выпуска составляет 250 тыс. облигаций номиналом $100 каждая, таким образом, компанией приобретен выпуск в полном объеме.
Ну вот, а паники то было) ювелирка?
Неочевидный факт. Если держите короткий выпуск Балтлиза (например П14), который сейчас 95%, то при успешной оферте вы выйдете с +5% роста к номиналу + сколько то там купоном. Если вдруг оферту не пройдут (ну мало ли), то выпуск грохнется куда нибудь на 30%. Если держите длинный, то он тоже грохнется, но при успешной оферте переоценится вверх сильнее на позитиве) мой последний ювелирный заход на этом основывался.
Главный вопрос, который меня интересовал, это что по приносу на оферту в ноябре. Обтекаемо отвечали, понятно, что гарантий никаких нет, что не принесут, но как я услышал, что пока что принос не ожидается со стороны клубных страховых. Сейчас для котировок вопрос прохождения ноябрьских оферт - основной. Ну а дальше уже верить или не верить) отсюда можно строить стратегию.
Кто смотрел, какие мысли?
Бабье лето в Москве закончилось — синоптики
А в облигациях оно и не начиналось.
Но есть и позитивные новости. Полипласт сегодня юаневый выпуск разместил на ~2 млрд и в сентябре на выплаты должно хватить (там ближе к 2.5 млрд, но не на сухом баке же сидят). А в октябре и ноябре довольно лайтовые выплаты. Ну и стоило так жути на эмитента нагонять?
НоваБев Групп перенесла на 29 сентября сбор заявок на облигации серий 004Р-01 и 004Р-02
Полипласт тоже сегодня отмена.
Осенняя хандра пришла на рынок бондов)
Завтра позвали на закрытый бизнес-завтрак с руководством компании Балтийский лизинг. Держать вас в курсе?)
Всем привет!
Вышел новый выпуск «Рынки. Разбор» на РБК про то, как собрать портфель из облигаций на год. Я участвовал в выпуске как один из трех экспертов и показал свой вариант портфеля с умеренным риском на 1 млн рублей.
Автор этого выпуска: Мая Нелюбина и вот ее канал: https://t.me/maya_nelyubina, в нем можно найти другие выпуски и полезные советы по управлению личными финансами. Она не только одна из самых обая…
По Балту рынок похоже перебесился и пошёл отскокер
👍69🔥25custom 530559831220684392619👀8❤7😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @zakharov_risk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Облигации Самолета после новостей валятся в труху. Ваши действия:
Держу, не дёргаюсь и не буду дергаться пока что33%
Держу, но думаю может выйти от греха подальше11%
Стремно стало, уже вышел/выхожу4%
Покупаю/докупаю9%
Вышел еще раньше до новостей15%
Никогда не было и не будет20%
Другое9%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Путь инвестора (Давыдов Артем) @put_investor · 32,792#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Путь инвестора (Давыдов Артем) @put_investor · 32,792 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Инвестдруг Ольга Сабитова @olgasabitova · 51,403 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Российские акции @russia_companies · 25,414 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Облигации | Invest Assistance @investassistancebonds · 41,695 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Финансовая нeзaвисимость @fndb777 · 66,033 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
IF Bonds — Облигации РФ @if_bonds · 94,956 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Cashflow - Ваш денежный поток @CashflowTime · 52,444 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Кира Юхтенко @kira_pronira · 64,955 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 August 2026
Биржевик | Облигации @birzhevikbondsofficial1 · 22,047 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
СИГНАЛЫ от CASHFLOW @Cashflowbuy · 49,536 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Sid // Инвестиции + @sid_inves · 36,504 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Финуслуги @MoexFinuslugi · 48,535 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Дмитрий Толстяков | Инвестиции и жизнь @dmitrytolstyakov · 34,572 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Алексей Линецкий @alexeylinetsky · 30,076 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
📚 Доказательное Инвестирование @invest_science_channel · 38,500 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций @mozgovikresearch · 23,295 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
IF Stocks @if_stocks · 120,286 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,614 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Аналитика Мосбиржи @analytics_moex · 34,938 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
IF Travel @without_borders_ru · 32,489 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Олег Кузьмичев @kuzmlab · 23,332 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Школа безопасных инвестиций @finraonline · 44,178 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
Сергей Пирогов @PirogovLive · 27,814 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Манька Аблигация @marythebond · 44,307 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zakharov Invest” (@zakharov_risk), 25,609 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zakharov_risk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.