Пишу про инвестиции на фондовом рынке и в недвижимость
6 лет на рынке и 5,5 млрд рублей под управлением. Выступаю на РБК и публикуюсь в СМИ. ТОП-15 авторов Пульс
Личка: @alex_abramyan
Created
29 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net -261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,414–9,753 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 21:08
9,453
-3
5 Nov 2026, 14:25
9,456
+2
2 Nov 2026, 22:39
9,454
-6
31 Oct 2026, 06:09
9,460
-10
27 Oct 2026, 23:59
9,470
-2
25 Oct 2026, 03:57
9,472
-4
22 Oct 2026, 11:28
9,476
-10
18 Oct 2026, 18:56
9,486
-13
15 Oct 2026, 11:26
9,499
-5
12 Oct 2026, 15:45
9,504
-27
6 Oct 2026, 00:39
9,531
-23
28 Sept 2026, 11:02
9,554
-36
15 Sept 2026, 13:55
9,590
-7
12 Sept 2026, 08:58
9,597
-10
8 Sept 2026, 08:16
9,607
-16
2 Sept 2026, 17:23
9,623
-7
30 Aug 2026, 22:36
9,630
-10
27 Aug 2026, 20:12
9,640
-5
25 Aug 2026, 05:13
9,645
-10
21 Aug 2026, 18:26
9,655
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 9,453 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
67 (14 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
35,063
Reactions total
662
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 23:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,120
Videos
≈58
Links
≈924
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,127 reactions across 65 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
919
43.2%
❤
480
22.6%
🔥
439
20.6%
😁
69
3.24%
🤝
48
2.26%
🎉
23
1.08%
🤣
20
0.94%
💯
19
0.893%
🤔
14
0.658%
👎
13
0.611%
😐
10
0.47%
🏆
9
0.423%
😱
7
0.329%
🤬
7
0.329%
🌚
5
0.235%
🥰
5
0.235%
🦄
5
0.235%
🍌
4
0.188%
👌
4
0.188%
😢
4
0.188%
15 further kinds
23
1.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 67 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
58
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thefinexpert. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.48%
3 of 67 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,540
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,610
over 64 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGDov25
1
17 October 2026
17 October 2026
2W5zFJBi2dG
1
27 October 2026
27 October 2026
2W5zFK1W8hp
1
4 November 2026
4 November 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🤯 Nvidia теряет -$400 млрд капитализации за 1 день на новостях об отставке Дженсена Хуанга
40 лет в браке, 33 года у руля компании - с основания до статуса самой дорогой компании мира с капитализацией $5 трлн и вот такой бесславный финал
Не берусь никого судить, думаю скорее о специфических рисках при анализе компании. Можно сколько угодно смотреть на P/E, EV/EBITDA, строить DCF модели и пытаться спрогнозировать дв…
🇦🇪 🇷🇺 Что ждать от переговоров в ОАЭ?
Сегодня стартуют двухдневные переговоры РФ-США-Украина в Абу-Даби. Кажется, что это очередное «договорились договариваться», - так ли это и чего ждать ждать?
Это первый раунд с февраля: тогда процесс шел довольно динамично, но застопорился из-за войны с Ираном и жестких требований России отдать Донбасс. С тех пор мы увидели удары по складам, НПЗ и дата-центрам в России, уничтож…
⚔️ Битва трейдеров: финальный рывок
Прошлая неделя у меня была еще хуже предыдущей. В итоге я «успешно» растерял доходность в +60%, свалился в -15% и только сейчас восстановился до +10%, отдав лидерство в битве Диане
Сильнее всего ударил шорт $VKCO, где мне пришлось закрыть позицию с убытком порядка 20% на капитал; обвалился и индекс ММВБ, видимо, испугавшись результатов выборов в США и обвала нефти
С нефтью особе…
🔼🔼🔼
После ударов по дата-центрам у некоторых инвесторов было опасения, что сильно пострадает и финтех бизнес Яндекса - Яндекс Банк
Шаг от агентства своевременный и позитивный, с Яндекс Банке все будет в порядке. Темпы роста тоже очень существенные
Залим, спасибо за комментарий!
💸 Яндекс $YDEX: АКРА улучшило прогноз по рейтингу Яндекс Банка до «Позитивного»
👉 Ключевое в оценке агентства: банк продолжает увеличивать бизнес, сохраняет положительный финансовый результат и располагает запасом прочности на случай финансовых шоков.
АКРА отмечает, что банк вышел из инвестиционной стадии и начал генерировать капитал собственными силами. Прибыль по МСФО за 2025 год превысила 4 млрд руб., за 1П26 — …
❓Как снизить комиссию брокера в 150 раз?
Я участвую в Битве трейдеров в Альфа-Инвестициях уже 3 недели и за это время сделал больше 100 сделок, совершив оборот на 12,1 млн рублей. И это при том, что мой стартовый капитал - всего 100 000!
Поэтому для меня крайне важен вопрос комиссии. Я могу классно торговать, но какой смысл, если значительную часть прибыли съест комиссия брокера? Поэтому я подключил профессиональны…
🇺🇸 Демократы побеждают на промежуточных выборах в Конгресс и забирают сразу Палату представителей и Сенат
Трампу будет значительно труднее реализовывать свои инициативы, придется отбиваться от расследований и импичментов
Демократы смогу включать помощь Украине в критически важные законопроекты, вызывать на слушания ключевых переговорщиков от США, чужая пространство для манёвра, ограничивать Трампа в снятии санкций
…
Новости о том, что Мединский возглавит нашу делегацию в Абу-Даби, так расстроили наш рынок, будто это равно полному провалу
Игнорируем новости о встречи Си, Трампа и Путина в Китае 18-19 ноября, новости о звонке европейцев Путину, встречу 5 ноября представителей России и Украины в Белом доме и еще кучу других позитивных сигналов
Настроение такое, будто кого-то хороним, - интересно, как истерично все меняется. А буд…
❗️Хочу узнать ваше мнение
Мой друг предложил одну идею и попросил меня протестировать ее. Ниже распишу, в чем суть, и хочу, чтобы вы мне накидали комментарии / возражения / обратную связь
В чем идея?
Представим, что у вас есть 14.000.000 и вы хотите купить машину - Zeekr 9X hyper. Мой друг приходит к вам и говорит
«А зачем тебе все это отдавать за машину, когда ты можешь отдать мне 4.000.000 и ездить на ней целый…
⚔️ Битва трейдеров: неделя 3. Ошибка за ошибкой
За неделю мой счет прибавил еще +9% и дорос до +40% с момента старта. Но я все равно недоволен: на прошлой неделе я совершил три сделки, каждая из которых оказалась неудачной
Шорт $BRZ6 сначала был в плюсе, а затем закрылся по стопу. Я, как и писал ранее, сначала жду эскалации и затем мирного решения и падения нефти в район 90-95. Пока же непонятно, будут удары посл…
❗️Банки запустили ипотеку в Крыму под 8% - для всех! Почему это важно?
Кто меня давно читает, наверняка помнит, что в 2024 году я купил в Ялте апартаменты за 12,3 млн. Это 60-метровая двушка в ЖК бизнес-класса с бассейном. Идея тогда была в том, чтобы сделать ставку на скорое завершение военного конфликта
Пока этого не случилось, но цены за это время подросли на ~80%. Я думаю, еще +50% вполне реально увидеть, если …
🔥17👍10😁4🙉3❤2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @thefinexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
По Евротрансу надо комментировать или и так все понятно?
Надо!37%
Не надо, помянем48%
Не в теме / все равно17%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 209%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Алексей Линецкий @alexeylinetsky · 30,485 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Залим Сохов - ON FLEEK investing @onfleek419 · 37,067 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
VM Finance @vmfinance · 18,990 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
Granite Trade | Торопов Степан @karsotel · 25,659 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
ИнвестТема | Литвинов Владимир @particular_trader · 35,228 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Газпромбанк Инвестиции @gpb_investments · 44,540 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Rezan Invest @rezinv · 19,649 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 September 2026
Сергей Пирогов @PirogovLive · 27,558 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Павел Шумилов - инвестиции, разборы компаний @ShumilovPavel · 30,926 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Инвестируй или проиграешь | Юрий Козлов @invest_or_lost · 27,277 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,666 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
P.S investing @malishok_fonda · 27,704 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Усиленные Инвестиции @eninv · 24,238 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
Market Power @marketpowercomics · 31,882 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
Олег Кузьмичев @kuzmlab · 23,488 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Invest Heroes @InvestHeroes · 39,736 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
InveStory @investorylife · 19,855 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 October 2026
Вредный Инвестор @harmfulinvestor · 30,919 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
ИнвестократЪ | Георгий Аведиков @investokrat · 31,651 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
Tom Capital @tomcapital · 31,541 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
ПРОГНОЗЫ ПО КОМПАНИЯМ @NataliaForecast · 30,525 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инвестиции с Александром Абрамяном” (@thefinexpert), 9,453 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thefinexpert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.