Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Влад | Про деньги

Channel

Влад | Про деньги

@Vlad_pro_dengi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

9,804subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318245184
TypeChannel
Username@Vlad_pro_dengi
DescriptionВладислав Еремин. Квал инвестор. Управляющий, автор стратегий автоследования в Т-Инвестициях и БКС. Покрываю аналитикой 70+ российских компаний. MAX: https://max.ru/Vlad_pro_dengi @vv_eremin https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/69ba98503cb73616cf4b27b4
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Vlad_pro_dengi

Growth

9,8049,8409,8225 August 2026 — 9,840 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,840 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,838 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,830 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,816 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,804 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,799–9,845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:199,804-12
12 Aug 2026, 01:339,816-14
9 Aug 2026, 10:119,830-8
6 Aug 2026, 18:479,838-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:499,840no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:029,840first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 9,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held35 (27 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total77,650
Reactions total1,953
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
981
Videos
32
Links
960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 16s
Average length
3m 08s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,766 reactions across 31 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,22769.5%
🔥27415.5%
23313.2%
🤝140.793%
😢60.34%
🙏50.283%
👏40.227%
😱30.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,953reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 35 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Vlad_pro_dengi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,400 views62 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

📉 За сегодня индекс Мосбиржи снизился на 3,6%. Многое попадало, при этом, обратил внимание, что больше всего (за исключением компаний сомнительного качества) сегодня снизился нефтегазовый сектор. И это на фоне падающего рубля (доллар уже 84), растущей нефти (Brent = 88) и все еще высочайших крек-спредов на бензин и дизель. Допускаю, что продажи эмоциональные и отражают ухудшившуюся ситуацию на заправках. Портфель и

👍4510🔥5😢2

14 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,590 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

❗️Друзья, сегодня — последний день, когда вы можете приобрести обзор моего портфеля на август. Портфелю, как формату, в котором я рассказываю вам о ключевых идеях на рынке акций, уже 2 года. За это время получил от вас большое кол-во отзывов о продукте. Влад, большое спасибо за портфель! 🤝 Этот продукт один из самых классных на рынке. Очень доходчиво по всем своим компаниям объясняешь. По ХХ супер расписал их денеж

👍144🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC≈1,600 views73 reactionsread 15 August 2026

С добрым утром, друзья! 🔖 Хедхантер Прибыль 2 кв. = 4,80 млрд руб. (-1,6%) Дивиденды = 200 руб. на 1 акцию, доходность 6,9%, последний день покупки - 25 сентября. По выручке и прибыли на несколько процентов слабее моих ожиданий, при этом, консенсус был ниже результатов. По выплате четко попал — поздравляю с дивидендами. 🏦 Совкомбанк Прибыль акционеров 2 кв. = 24,7 млрд руб. ROE = 23,5%. Отчет чистый — разовых д

👍65🔥53

13 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,730 views67 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

📉 Сегодня рынок красный, индекс снизился на 3%. 📲 Выделяется на фоне красного рынка Диасофт (+7,2%), компания сегодня сообщила о росте выручки на 21% в первом квартале (судя по всему, дошли до отчетности результаты последнего квартала 2025 года, которые сдвинулись во времени). Я остаюсь негативным по компании, надеюсь, будущие отчеты меня переубедят. 📱 ВК тоже сегодня отчитался, но отчет не помог, акции снижаются н

👍53🔥104

13 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,840 views65 reactionsread 15 August 2026

👀 Маржа X5 снижается г/г, прибыль падает, но дивиденды будут высокими. ➡️ EBITDA во 2 кв. = 74,3 млрд руб. (всего +2%), расходы выросли быстрее выручки. 📉Маржа по EBITDA снизилась до 5,76% (год назад 6,2%). 📉 Скор. прибыль упала до 22,7 млрд руб. (-33% г/г). При том, что результаты слабые — X5 за счет снижения CAPEX (всего 3,5% от выручки при прогнозе 4,5-4,7%) и положительного движения оборотного капитала на 26

👍50🔥105

12 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,820 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

❓Что представляет из себя обзор портфеля? Портфель — большая презентация на 45+ слайдов + видеоразбор, где я открыто делюсь с вами всеми своими идеями на рынке акций. Я делился с вами содержанием портфеля и демо-фрагментом тут: https://t.me/Vlad_pro_dengi/2467 А сейчас приложу видео из обзора по Т-Технологиям, чтобы вам было проще принять решение. Не менее подробно разбираю и другие свои идеи. Полный обзор портфе

👍13👏4🔥41

12 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,700 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Друзья, осталось 3 дня до конца продаж моего обзора портфеля на август! Дивиденды Т-Технологий планирую реинвестировать в саму компанию и позицию №4 в портфеле, если эти акции останутся на тех же уровнях, что сейчас. ✔️ С начала года портфель уже на 11 пп. опережает индекс полной доходности, с начала августа альфа выросла еще на 1 пп., портфель и на коррекции был устойчивее и восстанавливается быстрее. Вот почем

👍11🔥61

12 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,850 views78 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🏦 Какие дивиденды Сбер заработал за 7 месяцев 2026 года? Вчера зеленый банк отчитался за июль по РСБУ, все в порядке. ✔️Прибыль Сбера в июле 2026 = 168,4 млрд руб. (+16,2% г/г) ✔️ Чистые процентные доходы в июле 2026 = 315,1 млрд руб. (+19,8% г/г) Процентные доходы чуть меньше, чем в мае/июне, при этом, все еще значительно выше предыдущего года. ❗️Сохраняю прогноз по годовой прибыли Сбера = 2 000,5 млрд руб.

39👍31🔥8

11 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,850 views42 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

📈 Совкомбанк сегодня растет на 2% (!). Рост начался сразу же после выхода прогноза по результатам 2 кв. от Ренессанс Капитала Максима Орловского. Ренессанс ждет 24,3 млрд руб. чистой прибыли, это рост в 5 раз по отношению к прошлому году. Я думаю, что Ренессанс консервативен в плане оценки процентной маржи 😉 Мой прогноз результатов Совкомбанка, справедливую цену и идею в компании вы можете узнать из обзора портфе

👍2513🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC≈2,020 views83 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🏦 Обзор Т-Технологий — время быть оптимистом! ✔️ Скор. чистая прибыль 2 кв. 2026 (оценка Т) = 52,1 млрд руб. (+25,2% г/г), за первое полугодие скор. прибыль выросла на 31,2%. ✔️ По моей оценке, скор. прибыль Т во 2 кв. даже выше = 56 млрд руб. (видимо, я считаю дивиденды Яндекса как постоянный доход, а Т как разовый). Прибыль выросла за счет: 📈 Роста чистых процентных доходов на 28%; 📉 Снижения резервов в номина

👍61🔥13🙏54

11 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,840 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

📈 Акции Все Инструменты прибавили 16% за 2 недели! С 28 июля акции компании выросли с 66 до 76,5 руб. (на 16%), при том, что индекс Мосбиржи прибавил только 5%. Как вышел отчет, написал, что результаты сильнее ожиданий, и во 2 кв. вероятна рекордная прибыль: https://t.me/Vlad_pro_dengi/2434 . И в тот же день увеличил позицию по Ви.ру как в личном портфеле, так и в стратегиях автоследования. Хорошо получилось. Суд

👍266🤝3🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,150 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, и делюсь с вами демо-фрагментом из обзора портфеля с содержанием и идеей в Т-Технологиях, чтобы вам было проще принять решение. Также подробно разбираю все идеи. Приобрести обзор портфеля на август можно тут: https://payform.ru/meceLDu/

👍116🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Vlad_pro_dengi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Vlad_pro_dengi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,122,157 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Влад | Про деньги” (@Vlad_pro_dengi), 9,804 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vlad_pro_dengi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.