Mood
😁10👍3💯2

Channel
@kak_rastut
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
490subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002093545950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kak_rastut |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kak_rastut |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 490 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 491 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 495 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 495 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 30 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
152 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 52.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 6.58% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 6.58% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 6.58% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 5.92% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 5.26% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 3.95% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.63% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 2.63% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.97% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.97% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.97% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2024 to 27 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kak_rastut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 December 2024 to 27 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Mood
😁10👍3💯2
Честно говоря, мне не хватило внимания, сил и возможно чего-то еще, чтобы от начала и до конца послушать подкаст с этим громким расследованием, поэтому у меня нет нет морального права говорить об этом кейсе. Но пройти мимо и промолчать о том, что взрослые мужики не должны заниматься сексом с подростками — не могу. Хотя бы в силу физиологических особенностей подросткового мозга, которые очень кратко и емко описаны тут…
❤9🙏4🥴3👍1
Съездила в Питер на свою первую профессиональную конференцию без детей, мужа, собак, кота и тревоги. Получилась очень психотерапевтичная поездка во всех смыслах, что приходят в голову. Наверное, ключевым решением было оставить чувство вины на ленинградском вокзале и на три дня перестать нести ответственность за две самые важные жизни на свете. Я много работала со своей тревогой и видимо успешно. Пишу это и ловлю себ…
❤21🔥4😍4
Не могу удержаться и молчать. Моё горячо любимое Издательство редких книг впервые издает детскую книгу! И не какую-нибудь, а про собаку. И не просто про собаку, а про мою дорогую родственницу Киру! Да, Кира действительно существует. Она как и все члены нашего семейства периодически потягивается то к книгам, то к перу, то к сосискам из холодильника. Она правда всегда молчит, ходит на работу в издательство и часто пос…
❤🔥10🔥6😱3
Вчера утром гуляла с собаками и на обратном пути ехала в лифте с мужчиной. Мужчина вез тележку полную продуктов из магазина, что у нас в доме. Очень ухоженный и деловой, при этом очевидно хозяйственный мужик. Смотрит на моих собак, потом на меня и говорит: «ну надо же, как же вы все успеваете? Дом, готовка, уборка, собаки еще эти». Я в такие моменты обычно мнусь и отшучиваюсь, типа: «ну зато у нас всегда весело». Но …
❤23
Signed Женя Боярская
Как уходят с новогоднего праздника нормальные люди? С шампанским, с бенгальскими огнями, бредут пошатываясь или идут приплясывая. Женечка ваша Боярская уходит с книгой про детскую литературу, что обнаружила в шкафу у хозяйки вечеринки. Короче, держите подальше от меня свои книжные полки — в любых обстоятельствах и везде найду свою прелесть. Сегодня это «Книга как лекарство для детей» от Эллы Берту и Сьюзен Элдеркин. …
❤15🎉8👀2
Signed Женя Боярская
Да, недавно в саду обсуждали поведение детей — как раз с той стороны, что один из них очень «порядочный» и все яркие эмоции скрывает, но дома мы наслаждаемся всей палитрой от энтузиазма до гнева. Три дня захлебываемся свободными проявлениями наших мальчиков-зайчков. И с одной стороны, я очень рада, что они чувствуют свободу. Но этот их райский «островок безопасности» стал настоящим Фортом Боярд для нашей психики — со…
❤12🙏5👀4🌚3
Signed Женя Боярская
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @kak_rastut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Как они растут?” (@kak_rastut), 490 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kak_rastut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.