انگاره تغییر قبله از مکه به کربلا https://deraayaat.ir/qibla/ @Gholow2
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

Channel
@gholow2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,326subscribers
-2,932 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001084599038 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gholow2 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gholow2 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 11,326 | -58 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 11,384 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 11,393 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 11,395 | -13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 11,408 | -34 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 11,442 | -43 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 11,485 | -29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 11,514 | -23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 11,537 | -29 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:48 | 11,566 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:09 | 11,581 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 11,605 | -26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 11,631 | -26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 11,657 | -89 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 11,746 | -168 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 11,914 | -37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 11,951 | -19,982 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 31,933 | -89 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 32,022 | +19,886 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 12,136 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (7 June 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,615 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
انگاره تغییر قبله از مکه به کربلا https://deraayaat.ir/qibla/ @Gholow2
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
افسانه حضور امیرالمؤمنین در چهل مهمانی در یک شب https://deraayaat.ir/mihmani/ @Gholow2
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
🌸 نعمتِ هدایت در بخشی از زیارت مضجع نبوی (صلی الله علیه وآله) خطاب به آن حضرت، از امام صادق چنین آمده: ستایش خدای را که به وسیلۀ تو، ما را از شرک و گمراهی نجات داد... عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي عُمَيْرٍ وَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ عَنِ الْفَضْلِ بْنِ شَاذَانَ عَنْ صَفْوَانَ وَ ابْنِ أَبِي عُمَيْرٍ عَنْ مُعَاوِيَةَ بْنِ عَمَّارٍ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع قَالَ: … الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ …
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
کتاب مولد النبی، اثر شیخ مفید یا نسخهای از الهدایه خصیبی؟ https://deraayaat.ir/mawled-annabi/ @gholow2
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
آیا شیخ مفید، نه ربیع را عید دانسته است؟ https://deraayaat.ir/rabii/ ✍️علی عادلزاده
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
🌱نقد مستندات عید نه ربیع و مواردی مرتبط با آن - ابتدای فصل اول: مروری بر مهمترین مستندات تأیید و رد خبر نه ربیع؛ - ابتدای فصل دوم؛ - ردّ دلیل محاسباتی بر تاریخ قتل خلیفه در نه ربیع؛ - تصویر قدیمیترین مصادر از غلات نصیری که نه ربیع را عید دانستهاند. - خبر منسوب به شیخ صدوق (ره) در مورد نه ربیع - آیا شیخ مفید (ره) روز نهم ربیع را عید دانسته است؟ - چکیده مباحث - بررسی خبر الهداية الکبری درباره ابولؤلؤ 📚 نهم ربیع؛…
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
«الکافی و روایات احمر نخعی، تلاشی برای شناسایی منبع کلینی در نقل روایات اسحاقیه» حمید باقری، علوم قرآن و حدیث، ش96، 1396ش. کلینی در تألیف الکافی از منابع متعدد مکتوب حدیثی بهره برده است که بررسی آنها میتواند در شناسایی هرچه دقیقتر روش وی در تدوین کتابش سودمند باشد. نکته جالب توجه آنکه مؤلفان برخی از این منابعش در کتب رجالی افرادی دروغگو و حتی جاعل حدیث معرفی شدهاند؛ از جمله اسحاق بن محمد احمر که تاکنون هیچ پژوهش…
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
ستیز غالیان با شرایع؛ نمونه: حج و کعبه غالیان عموماً شرایع دینی را به تأویلهایی میبردند که از ظاهر شرایع و تعالیم دینی فاصله بسیار داشت. این رویکرد تأویلی از دیرباز در میان امامیه محل بحث بوده و اصحاب اهل بیت (ع)، بهویژه اصحاب امام صادق (ع)، در مواجهه با این نوع تفاسیر، به شدت از آن نهی کردهاند و روایات متعددی در مذمت این روش وجود دارد.[1] اما غالیان خطابی و نصیری، در بستر فقهگریزی بسیاری اوقات فراتر از تأویل …
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
▪️پیغمبری که دست دو عالم به دامنش با آن که آب غسل نخشکیده بر تنش آزرد باغ لالهاش از نیش خارها دیدند حملههای خزان را به گلشنش ایام عزای اهل بیت رسول الله ص و شهادت ایشان، امام مجتبی و امام رضا ع تسلیت باشد.
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
بررسی گزارش مناقب عتیق از نخستین خطبۀ امیرالمؤمنین (ع) در کوفه نیز نگر: الگوی تحریف اسناد در کتاب المناقب محمد بن علی بن الحسین العلوی
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
📕 نصیریه: تاریخ، منابع و عقاید ✍️ عمیدرضا اکبری با همکاری مهدی جمالیفر و علی عادلزاده مطالعۀ خلاصه فصول خرید کتاب با تخفیف قیمت سابق (حدود نصف قیمت جدید) @gholow2
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
السَّلامُ عَلَى وَلِيِّ اللَّهِ وَ حَبِيبِهِ السَّلامُ عَلَى خَلِيلِ اللَّهِ وَ نَجِيبِهِ السَّلامُ عَلَى صَفِيِّ اللَّهِ وَ ابْنِ صَفِيِّهِ السَّلامُ عَلَى الْحُسَيْنِ الْمَظْلُومِ الشَّهِيدِ السَّلامُ عَلَى أَسِيرِ الْكُرُبَاتِ وَ قَتِيلِ الْعَبَرَاتِ
Signed عمیدرضا اکبری
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @gholow2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@gholow2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“غلوپژوهی” (@gholow2), 11,326 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gholow2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.