Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for غلوپژوهی

Channel

غلوپژوهی

@gholow2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,817subscribers

-3,441 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001084599038
TypeChannel
Username@gholow2
Descriptionيا أهل الكتاب لا تغلوا في دينكم (نساء: ١٧١) - مطالعات حدیثی، تاریخی و فرقه‌شناسی - موضوع کانال منحصر به غلو فرقه‌ای نیست. مدیر اصلی: @amid3 مطالب قدیم: t.me/gholow2/1000 معرفة الرجال: @Al_Rijal صحف مطهرة: @sohof2 سایت: deraayaat.ir
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gholow2

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,81732,02221,419.56 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -3,441. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,636–35,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 11:1010,817-6
10 Nov 2026, 10:5610,823-35
8 Nov 2026, 22:0910,858-11
7 Nov 2026, 17:1910,869-1
6 Nov 2026, 17:0710,870-6
5 Nov 2026, 17:3610,876-4
4 Nov 2026, 20:2110,880-11
3 Nov 2026, 20:4710,891-128
2 Nov 2026, 17:3711,019-4
31 Oct 2026, 16:2011,023-12
30 Oct 2026, 15:3611,035-100
29 Oct 2026, 14:5611,135-6
28 Oct 2026, 14:3811,141-6
27 Oct 2026, 14:3511,147-3
26 Oct 2026, 16:0711,150-15
25 Oct 2026, 17:4911,165-6
24 Oct 2026, 17:3011,171-5
23 Oct 2026, 15:4911,176-6
22 Oct 2026, 13:3811,182-6
21 Oct 2026, 09:1911,188first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 10,817 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held47 (7 June 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total2,319
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 22:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈516
Videos
≈77
Links
≈1,060

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
2m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 20:18 UTC579 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @Al_Meerath

◼️ تا آنکه دود وارد خانه‌اش شد وقد روى إبراهيم بن سعيد الثقفي قال: حدّثنا أحمد بن عمرو البجلي، قال: حدّثنا أحمد بن حبيب العامري، عن حمران بن أعين عن أبي عبد اللّه جعفر بن محمد عليهما السلام قال: «والله ما بايع عليٌّ حتى رأى الدّخان قد دخل عليه بيتَه» (الشافي، ط 1441ق، ج4، ص170). شریف مرتضی نقل می‌کند از کتابِ مرحوم ابراهیم بن سعید ثقفی که او نقل کرد به اسنادش از حمران بن اعین از امام صادق (ع) که فرمود: «به خدا سوگن…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

25 Oct 2026, 06:18 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 13 November 2026

گزارش‌ موسی بن عقبه از هجوم به خانۀ فاطمه (س) https://t.me/Al_Meerath/1097

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

28 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC≈3,060 viewsread 13 November 2026

نقد گزارش عیون المعجزات در شهرت امام علی (ع) به زنده‌کردن مردگان روایتی طولانی از کتاب «عیون المعجزات» نوشته حسین بن عبدالوهاب (قرن پنجم هجری) داستان زنده‌کردن یک مرده توسط امام علی (ع) را در کوفه و شهرت امام به این وصف را روایت می‌کند. این گزارش، نمونه‌ای از روایات غلوآمیز است که هم از نظر سند و هم از نظر محتوا و ساختار و ادبیات، اشکالات متعدد و جدی دارد... https://deraayaat.ir/uyoon-almujizat @Gholow2

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

27 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC≈2,340 viewsread 13 November 2026

… در این میان تنها چند تحریر نادر ضعیف السند وجود دارد که افزون بر تأویل «اهل الذکر»، ذکر را رسول الله ص دانسته‌اند، و جمع آن با معانی ظاهری پیش‌گفته دشوارتر است، ولی یکی روایتی منقطع و دارای اضطراب است (الکافی، ج1، ص210، ح1 مرسلۀ محمد بن عجلان، در نقد متن آن: خویی، معجم رجال، ج1، ص35)‌؛ دیگری از تفسیر عبد الرحمن بن کثیر است (نگر: نفیسی و تجار، «مواجهه چندوجهی با راویان؛ تحقیق موردی: عبدالرحمن‌ بن ‌کثیر»)؛ و چند روای…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

27 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 13 November 2026

آیا تأویل اهل الذکر به امامان مخالف و در تعارض با ظاهر دو آیۀ فسألوا أهل الذکر است؟ این گمانه نزد برخی وجود دارد که با وجود قطعیت صدور روایات تأویلی ذیل این آیه، این تأویل در تعارض با ظاهر و سیاق آیات محل بحث است که در نگاه اول ناظر اهل کتاب دانسته می‌شود. در راستای بررسی این دیدگاه، این پرسش مطرح است که فارغ از روایات، مقصود از اهل الذکر چیست؟ ذکر در آیات استعمالات متعددی دارد (رضایی اصفهانی و نبی‌زاده، «مرجعیت علم…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

27 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @alasar_1Voice message

📻 تفسیر باطن (۶) نقد مقاله «ویژگی‌های باطن قرآن از منظر روایات» نوشته امین حسین‌پوری - بخش دوم 0:00 | مقدمه 3:16 | استناد نویسنده به سیره عملی اهل بیت (ع) 10:13 | تعمیم مغالطه‌آمیز و قیاس ناروای فقراتی که دارای پیام عام و معنی تام است با فقراتی که بدون در نظر گرفتن سیاق، معنایش مبهم یا دگرگون می‌شود 17:58 | «وما تشاؤون إلا أن یشاء الله» 25:45 | «ووصینا الإنسان بوالدیه» ـ الگوی اشتقاق 39:51 | حدیث «الکوفة جمجمة العر…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

24 Sept 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @alasar_1Voice message

📻 تفسیر باطن (۴) نقد مقاله «تأویلات اهل بیت، مبانی و پیش‌فرض‌ها» نوشته امین حسین‌پوری - بخش سوم 0:00 | خوش‌بینی به تراث حدیثی و بی‌توجهی به اعتبارسنجی 5:07 | منطقی نبودن حمل احادیث ضعاف بر معانی درست پیش از تحقیق 6:54 | روایت داود بن کثیر در تأویل شرائع - مسائل البلدان 20:31 | استعمال «کنایه» 23:47 | محوریت ولایت اهل بیت (ع) در دعوت پیامبران پیشین - تفسیر منسوب به امام عسکری (ع) 33:02 | «والتین والزیتون» 39:03 | جم…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

24 Sept 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @alasar_1Voice message

📻 تفسیر باطن (۳) نقد مقاله تأویلات اهل بیت، مبانی و پیش‌فرض‌ها نوشته امین حسین‌پوری - بخش دوم 00:00 | تکمیلی درباره «واللیل إذا یسر» 03:16 | تکمیلی درباره درباره «مرج البحرین یلتقیان» 11:39 | هدف آقای حسین‌پوری از نظریه‌پردازی 17:05 | دو اشکال اساسی نظریه نویسنده و ناکام ماندن از رسیدن به هدف نمونه‌های تکذیب ظاهر قرآن: 19:10 | کیسانیه و تأویل «والتین» 21:37 | إن أنکر الأصوات لصوت الحمیر - کتاب أحیقار 28:34 | وأوح…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

23 Sept 2026, 21:36 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @alasar_1Voice message

📻 تفسیر باطن (۲) نقد مقاله تأویل قرآن به مقامات اهل بیت؛ مبانی و پیش‌فرض‌ها نوشته امین‌ حسین‌پوری- بخش اول ۱. مقدمه 0:00 | چکیده مقاله 2:44 | دو اشکال کلی: مواجهه غیرعقلانی با متن و فقدان اعتبارسنجی ٢. تقسیم‌بندی آیات مدح و‌ ذم 5:00 | متن نویسنده 10:18 | اشکال اول: تعمیم بی‌دلیل 11:58 | حدیث محمد بن مسلم 16:22 | حدیث سلیمان دیلمی و انتساب موازی 22:27 | اشکال دوم: پذیرش اعتبار سیاق 25:05 | واللیل إذا عسعس 27:19 | و…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

23 Sept 2026, 21:36 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @alasar_1Voice message

📻 تفسیر باطن (۱) [پیش‌گفتار نقد آراء آقای امین حسین‌پوری درباره تفسیر باطن] 00:00 | مقدمه ۱. دسته‌بندی روایات تفسیر باطن ناظر به قیامت: 02:50 | دسته اول 04:57 | دسته دوم 07:56 | دسته سوم 09:47 | دسته چهارم ۲. معیارهای نقد: ۲. ۱. بررسی سندی 11:53 | عقلایی بودن بررسی سندی 14:12 | لزوم بررسی سندی برای جریان‌شناسی 17:02 | نتایج جریان‌شناسی با نمونه‌های موردی نقض نمی‌شود ۲. ۲. سلامت محتوایی تفسیر 25:50 | تناسخ 27…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

22 Sept 2026, 12:58 UTC≈4,820 viewsread 13 November 2026

گزارشی از فقیه فقید آقا سید موسی شبیری زنجانی رحمه الله ✍️ محمدمهدی رنجبر (طلبه در سطح4 حوزۀ علمیۀ قم) در روزی که منسوب به وفات حضرت معصومه سلام‌الله علیها بود (که تاریخ آن علی التحقیق ساختگی است) آیت الله شبیری را دیدم و گفتم آیا جا داره امروز مشکی بپوشیم و ایشان سریع و قاطع گفتند هیچ جایی ندارد و اتفاقا باید به جعلی بودنش مدام تذکر داده شود. عرض کردم: چرا؟ فرمودند: اگر الان جلوی آن گرفته نشود، روزی می‌رسد که انکار…

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

21 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,830 viewsread 13 November 2026
File

💠در باب تاریخ وفات حضرت فاطمۀ معصومه (سلام الله علیها) و آفت بزرگ جعل حدیث و تاریخ با اهداف دینی 🎙 استاد فرزانه سید موسی شبیری زنجانی (رحمه الله) 🗓 خارج فقه صوم - ۲۴ اسفندماه ۱۳۸۹ ش گزارش مرتبط @Gholow2

Signed عمیدرضا اکبری

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @gholow2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gholow2 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شیعه پژوهی
@negahiinou · 13,143
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“غلوپژوهی” (@gholow2), 10,817 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gholow2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.