Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Riri's Web3 Diary

@RiriWeb3Diary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

870subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002560077872
TypeChannel
Username@RiriWeb3Diary
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RiriWeb3Diary

Growth

870871870.57 Aug 2026, 15:31 — 871 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 871 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:13 — 870 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:318 Aug 2026, 07:13
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 870–871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:13870-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:16871no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:31871first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.85%
avg views ÷ 870 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.9
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total814
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1090.9%
🔥19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @yeouidobi

정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 진행되지 못하고 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다.

6 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @GemHivePhoto

살목지 쿠팡플레이 무료로 풀렸어요 영화관에서 돈주고 보긴 아깝지만 깜짝 깜짝 놀라는 B급 감성으로 보기엔 개추 사진은 장원영 언니라고함 ㅎㅎ

4 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MBMweb3Photo

✔️모아카드샵 텔레그램 채널 오픈 안녕하세요! 모아카드샵입니다. 현재 매장은 공사 막바지 단계이며,이번 주 토요일 공사가 마무리될 예정입니다 이후 8월 15일 ~ 17일에는 가오픈 이벤트를 진행할 예정입니다! - 신상품 & 입고 소식 - 특가 판매 및 한정 상품 - 이벤트 & 경품 안내 - 희귀 카드 / 프로모 정보 - 해외 TCG 최신 소식 등을 가장 빠르게 공유드릴 예정입니다 앞으로 다양한 이벤트와 한정 판매도 텔레그램에서 가장 먼저 공개할 예정이니 많은 참여 부탁드립니다! ➡️입장 : 클릭 곧 매장에서 만나뵙겠습니다.

3 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @KooncryptoPhoto

대만 TCG판에서 대형 카드샵 먹튀 의혹 터짐. - 오늘 새벽 유명 카드샵 小羊卡牌社이 LINE·인스타·페이스북을 모두 닫고, 실물 매장까지 닫고 책임자가 연락두절됨 - 미배송뿐만 아니라 포켓몬카드 선주문금, 고가 카드 위탁판매, PSA·BGS 감정 대행 카드, VIP·대량 주문금까지 얽혀 있는 상황 - 피해액은 최대 3억 대만달러, 한화 약 133억 원까지 이야기 나오는 중 - 현재 경찰과 검찰이 수사 중이라고 함 ✅중화권 KOL Han 1700만원정도 러그당해서 올라온 글 ✅다른 kol SiNaToDdFelix 트윗

2 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC40 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @forevernftPhoto

✔️BNB Chain 토큰화 주식 거래량, Q2에 약 23억 달러 돌파 BNB Chain은 RWA, 특히 토큰화 주식 분야에서 이미 선두권에 자리 잡고 있으며 계속 성장 중입니다. 1️⃣ Q2 토큰화 주식 거래량 약 23억 달러 달성 2️⃣ DEX 거래량 전 분기 대비 13배 증가 3️⃣ 주요 동력: Binance bStocks, Ondo, xStocksFi 4️⃣ 최근 로빈후드도 자체 체인 론칭 + 밈×주식 페어링(‘밈스톡’)으로 RWA 공략 중 → BNB Chain 역시 bStocks 기반 Stock Memes로 같은 방향 추진, 경쟁 더 치열해짐 ✍️7월 bStocks가 온체인 토큰화 주식 거래량의 약 85%를 차지하며 빠르게 성장했습니다. 밈으로 관심을 끌고 RWA로 거래량을 붙이는 흐름, 여기에 Binance라는 강력한 유입 통

🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

그리고 또 이제야 나온 사진!!! 사실 저날 신은 샌들은 다 뜯겨서 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 바로 버림 흑흑 그래도 아가들이랑 힐링의 시간이어서 좋았다…🫶 오른쪽 사진은 저날 같이 봉사 끝나고 밥먹으러 갔을때 그냥 찍어본 기념샷,, 크크 치어리더 박예진이랍니당 강아지 키우고 싶으신분들은 보호소 아이들도 예쁜 친구들 많아서 아가들 펫샵말고 입양해보셔용🌸❤️

3

31 Jul 2026, 00:53 UTC74 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

벌써..! 7월 마지막날이네용 더운데 모두 고생 많으셨숩니다 그럼 금요팅☕️❤️

1

31 Jul 2026, 00:52 UTC39 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @followin_ko

한국 증시는 최대 14%까지 급등하며 사상 최대 상승폭을 기록했다. —🔗link

30 Jul 2026, 04:08 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @airdr0p_labPhoto

Kaito의 신규 야핑에 대한 생각 (2/2) 사실 겉으로 보면 되게 그럴싸하고 뭔가 해볼 수 있을 것 같지만... 개인적으로는 그냥 KOL 인력사무소 같은 플랫폼이 될 것 같긴합니다. 일단 팔로워나 혹은 제 3자를 실제 프로덕트 이용으로 전환하는 것 자체가 난이도가 너무 높은 일인데요. 제 채널도 원래 전환율이 낮은 편인데 크립토 시장이 얼어붙은 이후로는 정말 전환율이 바닥입니다. 대부분 저를 포함해서 이 시장에서 돈을 쓰는 것을 망설이고 있고 하도 에어드랍 통수도 많다보니 '에드작' 자체가 사멸위기에 놓인 수준입니다. 거기다가 온체인은 해킹 위험성까지 있어서 예치작도 쉽게 권장하기가 참 어렵습니다. 거기다가 Kaito가 이전에 그렇게 프로젝트를 까다롭게 필터링하지 않았던 것을 생각하면 이거하세요 라고 쉽게 이야기하기도 어려울 것

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @RiriWeb3Diary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 256,429 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Riri's Web3 Diary” (@RiriWeb3Diary), 870 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RiriWeb3Diary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.