Channel
@ninicoinin
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
272subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002072734619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ninicoinin |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ninicoinin |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 272 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 270 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 270 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 341 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
니니의 코인 사커킥 pinned «정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할…»
✅ [속보] 호르무즈 협상·기업 실적 '숨고르기'…다우 0.9%↓ https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/215/0001261471
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다 @netdebtzer0 로 연…
👍2
😃FABRIC 관련 소식 | RoboPay Integration Bounty 진행 현황 Fabric Foundation이 RoboPay Integration Bounty의 진행 현황을 공유했습니다. 바운티 시작 이후 현재까지 12개의 주요 로봇 플랫폼을 대상으로 총 16건의 연동 제출이 접수되었습니다. 현재 Fabric 팀은 각 제출물을 시뮬레이션 및 실제 로봇 환경에서 검토하고 검증을 진행하고 있습니다. 또한 총 1,000,000 ROBO 규모의 바운티는 계속 진행 중이며, 개발자들은 RoboPay와 다양한 로봇 플랫폼을 연동하는 프로젝트에 참여할 수 있습니다. 머신 이코노미에 더 많은 로봇이 참여할 수 있도록 개발자들의 많은 관심과 참여를 기대하고 있습니다. 자세한 내용은 원문을 참고해 주세요. 트윗원문 Fabric 공식 채널 공식…
👍1
국가에서 지원하는 ai 토큰 신청 ㄱㄱ 과기부에서 진행하고, 선착순 3만명이라고 함. 수강신청하기를 누르고 교육 3단계를 이수하면 신청가능한데 대략 이수는 10분정도 걸린 듯. ai토큰 주고, 공공데아터 api도 무료로 제공해줘서 이쪽으로 쓸 일 있으면 괜찮을 듯. 일단 받고보자. https://aitestbed.kr/main-page
🔥1
Gm
👍3
개굴개굴
👍1
5분 후 OPEN https://pools.trade
시타델을 포함한 여러 대형 헤지펀드가 새로운 사이버 공격의 물결에 휩싸였습니다. —🔗link
👍1
$CASHCAT 바이빗 선물 상장 로빈후드 체인의 밈코 대장 $CASHCAT이 방금 바이빗 선물에 상장했습니다 과거 솔라나 밈코 불장 시절엔 바이빗 선물 상장 = 사형 선고 수준으로 가격이 원웨이로 빠졌는데 로빈후드 체인은 어떨지 궁금하네요 어느 방향으로든 변동성이 심할거 같슴다
👍1
이야 나도 AMA 한다~! 라오니 x peaq AMA 안내 업비트 상장 로보틱스 대표주자 peaq와 AMA를 진행합니다. 로봇이 돈을 버는 시대 : peaq Economics 2.0 딥다이브 로봇은 언제 오는가, 아니 이미 왔는가. 그리고 기계가 번 돈은 어디로 가는가. 일시 : 8월 5일(수) 21시 장소 : 라오니 X Space (링크 추후 공지) 진행 : 라오니, peaq 팀 공식 답변 기반 보상 베스트 사전질문 : 상품권 5만원 X 5명 추첨 : 커피 X 100명 베스트 질문 5개는 방송에서 직접 읽고 그 자리에서 시상 참여 미션 1️⃣ AMA 트윗 좋아요·리트윗·사전질문 댓글 2️⃣ peaq 한국 공지방 + 채팅방 입장 (필수) 3️⃣ X Space 참여 4️⃣ 구글폼 제출 ⏰ 폼 마감 당일 23시 🔗 peaq 한…
🧙🏿♂️ [AMA] Ritual과 중요한(?) 타이밍에 인사하기 X 어나운스 공지 일시 및 장소: 8월 5일 오후 10시 코인같이투자 트위터 한때 가장 기대되는 커뮤니티 작으로 타커뮤니티에 소개되기던 했던, AI 인프라 체인 Ritual과 AMA를 가집니다. 기억하는 정보로는 폴리체인 출신이 직접 나와 프로젝트를 빌딩했던 것으로 이름을 날렸고, 당시에 폴리체인, 모나드 파운더, 아나그램, 핵VC, 로봇 벤처스, 다오5 등으로부터 약 $30M을 모금한 이력도 있습니다. 현재 테스트넷 페이즈1이 끝난 상태에서 과연 어떤 이야기를 할게 있어서 방문했는지 알아보시죠. 또한 PloPlo 홀더로써 리추얼 메인넷도 당연히 중요한 일정이라 확인해봅시다요! 1️⃣ 사전 이벤트 : 해당 트위터 게시글 Like + RT (필수) : 게시글에 사전질문…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ninicoinin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 588,119 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“니니의 코인 사커킥” (@ninicoinin), 272 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ninicoinin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.