Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ego Crypto

Channel

Ego Crypto

@egocrypton

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

405,772subscribers

-64,046 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009019168
TypeChannel
Username@egocrypton
DescriptionНаучу, как ЗАРАБОТАТЬ на дропах, NFT, DePIN, тестнетах, нодах и мем-коинах. Реклама: @archivedadmin
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/egocrypton

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@crypto_Iemon/97565 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC@egocrypton/8414 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC0.992.7 hours
@crypto_Iemon/97575 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC@egocrypton/8413 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC0.9953 minutes
@crypto_Iemon/97504 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC@egocrypton/8407 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC0.9861 minutes
@crypto_Iemon/97616 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC@egocrypton/8420 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC0.982.0 hours
@crypto_Iemon/97677 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC@egocrypton/8425 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC0.981.7 hours
@crypto_Iemon/97656 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC@egocrypton/8423 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC0.972.0 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@crypto_Iemon10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.981.8 hours@crypto_Iemon (10–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @crypto_Iemon. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far below this size band

811 average views per post against 408,840 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.198%. Across the 472 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,474–992,998 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 2.90% and 17.3%, with a median of 7.32%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured130 of 130 published in the window (115 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled105,427
Mature posts only0.2% over 126 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers408,840 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb316228:rus · 472 channels · p10 1.60% · p25 2.90% · p50 7.32% · p75 17.3% · p90 34.8%
Position in cohort0.849th percentile · 1/37 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.071% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

405,772469,818437,7957 August 202610 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 95 days, net -64,046. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 396,165–479,425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 01:37405,772-1,100
8 Nov 2026, 17:36406,872-667
7 Nov 2026, 11:49407,539-739
6 Nov 2026, 08:59408,278-562
5 Nov 2026, 09:21408,840-687
4 Nov 2026, 06:39409,527-839
3 Nov 2026, 06:36410,366-385
2 Nov 2026, 08:01410,751-898
1 Nov 2026, 05:18411,649-532
31 Oct 2026, 07:35412,181-959
30 Oct 2026, 05:19413,140-642
29 Oct 2026, 02:48413,782-583
28 Oct 2026, 03:35414,365-569
27 Oct 2026, 06:56414,934-844
26 Oct 2026, 04:21415,778-403
25 Oct 2026, 02:57416,181-637
24 Oct 2026, 01:57416,818-649
23 Oct 2026, 04:49417,467-486
22 Oct 2026, 07:05417,953-905
21 Oct 2026, 01:21418,858first reading

Engagement

434 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.197%
avg views ÷ 405,772 subscribers
Avg views / post
801
130 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.515%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
130
of 434 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held434 (4 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total104,154
Reactions total343
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,380
Videos
≈1,280
Links
≈3,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,102 reactions across 155 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤49544.9%
🔥43139.1%
😁12911.7%
🫡201.81%
😱151.36%
🤯90.817%
😢30.272%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 176 of the 434 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 434 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 130 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC301 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Хакеры уже используют уязвимость в Google Chrome Google выпустила экстренное обновление браузера, устраняющее сразу 9 уязвимостей, семь из которых имеют высокий уровень опасности ⚠️ Одну из обнаруженных уязвимостей, по заявлению Google, уже используют в реальных атаках Подробности пока скрывают, чтобы злоумышленники не успели воспользоваться ими до массового обновления браузеров, т.ч.: 🔹 Откройте Chrome → Настр…

10 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC281 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🩸 Рынок продолжает брить лонгистов — ВТС ниже $73к На фоне роста инфляции в США — графики заливает кровью: ➖ ВТС в моменте ниже $73к ➖ ЕТН — опустился до $2000 ➖ На альты лучше не смотреть За сутки лонгистов вынесло еще всего на $500млн, но день еще не окончен, а фонда может в ближайшие часы потянуть крипту сильно ниже🚬

10 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC484 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🍎 Владельцам iPhone и Mac срочно проверить обновления Binance предупредила о потенциально опасной уязвимости worse_query, которая может поставить под угрозу криптокошельки пользователей Apple По сообщению биржи, вредоносные приложения способны получать доступ к локальным файлам других приложений, включая данные, связанные с криптовалютой 🔐 Что необходимо сделать: ➖ Обновить iOS, macOS и установленные приложения …

10 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC584 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Против Nvidia подали коллективный иск Акционеры подали иск против компании и Дженсена Хуанга, обвинив их в сокрытии информации о предполагаемых связях главы компании с женщиной, которую подозревают в сотрудничестве с китайской разведкой, из-за чего: ➖ Акции Nvidia упали на 4,3% за понедельник ➖ Капитализация сократилась примерно на $190 млрд ➖ Совет директоров начал собственное расследование Иск подали всего ч…

9 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC699 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Новый FUD подъехал: США снова грозит шатдаун Не успел рынок переварить проблемы Nvidia, ИИ-пузырь и конфликт с Ираном, как на горизонте появился очередной риск — растет вероятность остановки работы правительства к 12 декабря. 11 декабря истекает временное финансирование правительства США Главный спор — бюджет и финансирование войны с Ираном. Демократы рассматривают возможность использовать бюджетные переговоры д…

9 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC726 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Готовимся падать? Nvidia теряет 6% на премаркете Акции $NVDA потеряли более 6% на европейских торгах, а с октябрьского пика компания просела уже на 22% И всё это на фоне опасений по поводу окупаемости гигантских инвестиций в ИИ. Главная опасность для крипты — цепная распродажа технологических активов. Если начнут массово сокращать рисковые позиции — BTC и альткоины тоже могут попасть под удар ❗️Через 10 минут от…

9 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC616 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🇪🇺 Binance заблокирует часть пользователей из ЕС Биржа начала уведомлять пользователей из Франции, Испании, Италии и Польши о закрытии счетов, но самое интересное — комиссии: ➖ С 29 ноября за остаток на счету начнут списывать 0,025% от баланса ежемесячно, но не менее $10 ➖ Если на счёте осталось меньше $10 — спишут весь остаток ➖ 31 декабря затронутые аккаунты закроют ⚠️ Причина — Binance пока не получила европе…

❤1

9 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC568 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

😍 TradingView выкатили спойлер на следующую бычку Капитализация крипторынка (TOTAL) на графиках площадки в моменте достигла $6,28трлн, из которых на альты приходится 4,47трлн (в 7 раз выше реальной)🚀 К слову, реальная общая капа в 2,5 раза меньше — $2,47трлн Нам показали альтсезон😏

❤1😁1

9 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC566 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 В США взялись за Binance, Tether и криптоимперию Трампа Сенатор Ричард Блюменталь потребовал до 4 января раскрыть документы о подозрительных криптотранзакциях, включая возможные финансовые связи с Ираном В дальнейшем сенатор может получить полномочия для принудительного истребования документов и пояснений Крипторынок ещё не отошёл от предыдущих потрясений, а в Вашингтоне уже готовят новую порцию вопросов🍿

9 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC659 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Глава NVIDIA изменил жене с китайской шпионкой. Идет расследование Американская разведка подозревает, что китайские спецслужбы могли использовать романтические отношения главы Nvidia Дженсена Хуанга с руководительницей Megaspeed для получения информации об ИИ-чипах ➖ Megaspeed подозревают в обходе американских экспортных ограничений. Через малайзийское подразделение компания закупила оборудование Nvidia миниму…

❤1😁1

9 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC630 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🩸 Спонсор обвала на выходных — Марко Рубио Госсекретарь США заявил, что переговоры с Ираном не приносят результатов, а требования Тегерана неприемлемы для Вашингтона На фоне обострения риторики: 🟠 Bitcoin опускался ниже $74к 🔻 Ethereum в моменте опускался ниже $2 100 Ликвидациями криптанов вынесло на $1млрд за сутки, само собой — практически всё досталось лонгистам Рынок снова закладывает риск затяжного конфлик…

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 434 posts we hold for @egocrypton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @egocrypton as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Crypto Games
@combathamster · 60,801
#1
Hamster Kombat Announcement
@hamster_kombat · 19,576,556
#2
Криптопаук 🎆
@CryptoPayk · 148,349
#3
Ladesov Crypto
@eeusd · 1,059,589
#4
ОТЦОВСКОЕ ОБЩЕСТВО
@evgenahata · 94,834
#5
INCRYPTO
@incrypto_tg · 138,791
#6
1000$ на Крипте
@DollarCryptan · 10,648
#7
Крипта Скруджа ⚡️
@crypta · 499,152
#8
Crypto Wolf
@Crypto_Woolf · 1,994,885
#9
Россия Вещает | News
@vestirussia · 905,345
#10
HAYZON
@hayzonn · 2,555,546
#11
Crypto Fomo
@crypto_gst · 537,461
#12
Crypto - TEAM | JEMAN
@crypto_jeman · 621,497
#13
КриптоТапок
@crypto_tappok · 79,867
#14
TonsBase⚡️Live
@tons_base · 451,118
#15
КриптоСоветник
@crypadvis · 90,538
#16
Работа из Дома | Центр Найма
@BigMishCr · 16,244
#17
Фармим Web3 🐹
@farmingweb · 26,419
#18
Дропы хомяка
@hamsterdropru · 55,207
#19
Криптограм 👾
@cryptogram_web3 · 388,107
#20
Private Alpha
@lenvies · 1,410,986
#21
Prо it & tg
@Pepe_Drophanter · 48,132
#22
Влогчейн
@vlogchain · 28,030
#23
Мувы Белевского
@belevskmove · 978,429
#24
Ton.Fo
@tonfo · 131,096
#25
Новости Walt (ранее Кошелёк)
@walt_news_cis · 1,086,188
#26
Hamster
@hamster_buy · 15,750
#27
Реальная Крипта
@rilcrypto · 69,232
#28
Главный инвестор
@investor_hamster · 41,727
#29
TON 💎 BIZNES
@biznest0n · 618,251
#30
Alex_MVP
@playweb4 · 137,021
#31
Regular Trader
@Gifts_Traderr · 188,345
#32
INTERLUDE
@intervtone · 576,993
#33
The Whale Post
@thecryptoff · 21,924
#34
Очко Олексія Кулеби
@shkilmaksym · 216,780
#35
ShortWorldsNews
@MemeAler · 41,392
#36
Not The Hamster 🐹
@NotTheHamster · 267,035
#37
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 12,771,035
#38
BIRD TON
@birdton · 763,764
#39
Антон про крипту
@Anton_cryptoo · 137,811
#40
GOATS Channel
@realgoats_channel · 4,180,509
#41
Lost Dogs Co Ru
@lostdogscoru · 208,912
#42
Медиа Россия
@mediarussia · 2,020,391
#43
AUTO RUSS | Про Тачки
@autoruss · 739,072
#44
Nomis | Onchain Reputation Protocol
@nomis_protocol · 1,430,418
#45
Meta Silense TON
@ToNmetasilense · 2,435,476
#46
INVEST ZONE | Khairullin Ruslan
@invest_zonaa · 848,307
#47
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,423,087
#48
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 7,833,486
#49
Alex Falcon
@iamalexfalcon · 2,795,558
#50
Boom: Crypto News
@boomloudcoin · 1,549,192
#51
Catizen Announcement
@catizenann · 3,305,663
#52
Catapult Extreme
@catapult_extreme · 7,596,342
#53
Yescoin
@theyescoin · 5,148,896
#54
CATS Community
@Cats_housewtf · 7,014,870
#55
Tomarket Announcement
@tomarket_ai · 5,875,745
#56
SEED Updates
@seedupdates · 7,246,174
#57
Trending Apps
@trendingapps · 3,550,872
#58
HOT Updates
@hotonnear · 4,290,950
#59
Walt News (ex. Wallet)
@walt_news · 3,287,035
#60
tapswap community
@tapswapai · 9,600,026
#61
Gram of TON
@gram · 6,218,751
#62
Rocky Rabbit Channel
@rockyrabbitio · 3,247,164
#63
Corn Battles🌽⚔️🌽
@corn_battles · 971,418
#64
Builders
@builders · 3,233,909
#65
Time Farm News
@TimeFarmChannel · 4,675,683
#66
PIGS Community
@pigscrew · 1,930,010
#67
The Signal 24
@the_signal_24 · 5,384,854
#68
TapCoins
@theTapCoins · 2,664,890
#69
TON Station
@tonstationgames · 2,875,536
#70
HEXN.IO Channel
@hexnio · 1,835,454
#71
1win Token
@token_1win · 2,781,412
#72
Dotcoin Community
@dotcoincommunity · 3,633,238
#73
Hedgi News (ex. Vertus)
@the_vertus · 1,974,162
#74
Cat Gold Miner Announcements
@catgoldminerann · 832,618
#75
Banana Announcement
@banana_update · 1,290,496
#76
Bitget Wallet Announcements
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,547,054
#77
Holdcoin Channel
@Holdcoin_Channel · 1,991,210
#78
Amio Community
@AmioCommunity · 1,484,955
#79
Money 💰 Crypto & Finance
@money · 2,604,718
#80
N1 Channel
@num1_ch · 363,330
#81
PocketFi News
@pocketfi · 1,644,000
#82
WATCoin
@watbird · 1,368,822
#83
GAMEE Community
@gameechannel · 1,769,990
#84
ONUS Announcements (English)
@onus_globalchannel · 1,502,093
#85

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Games
@combathamster · 60,801
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
INCRYPTO
@incrypto_tg · 138,791
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Криптопаук 🎆
@CryptoPayk · 148,349
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
⚙️ Деталька
@deta1ka · 117,406
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
Очко Олексія Кулеби
@shkilmaksym · 216,780
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
НОТКОИН ЛИСТИНГ ХОМЯКОВ ХАМСТЕРАХ В НА
@khomyake · 92,012
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
ОТЦОВСКОЕ ОБЩЕСТВО
@evgenahata · 94,834
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Криптограм 👾
@cryptogram_web3 · 388,107
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
ShortWorldsNews
@MemeAler · 41,392
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
🔥ЛИСТИНГ В ХОМЯКАХ НА
@shifry_khomyakov · 45,878
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
КриптоСаня
@cryptoosanya · 74,613
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
Юнит • Системщики Профита 🔥 Весь мир, как офис
@demwinner · 184,454
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
КриптоБанда
@CryptaBanda · 46,218
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
Крипта Скруджа ⚡️
@crypta · 499,152
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
Crypto Airdrops
@Hamsterkeygen3 · 36,958
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Prо it & tg
@Pepe_Drophanter · 48,132
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Криптотелега
@telegacrypton · 98,334
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
MasterRingo
@MasterRingo10 · 42,289
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 28 August 2026
300 Криптанцев
@cryptanci · 78,517
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Ton.Fo
@tonfo · 131,096
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Smartest Community
@smartest_official · 588,707
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
Будь в Тренде
@trends_ok · 423,023
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 August 2026
Главный инвестор
@investor_hamster · 41,727
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
Деньги 💰 на Крипте
@money_cryptoo · 90,093
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 87 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

pro.rbc.ruregistrable domain: rbc.ru1 post · 5 August 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post
x.com1 post · 5 August 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ego Crypto” (@egocrypton), 405,772 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egocrypton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.