СКАМЯТ ШОРТИСТОВ Биткоин на бирже Bitfinex поднимался выше $150 тыс. 20 сентября такая цена биткоина зафиксирована на графике бессрочного фьючерса на Bitfinex Поэтому лучше на СПОТе мешки набирать🙄

Channel
Влогчейн
@vlogchain
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,078subscribers
-823 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001144076254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vlogchain |
| Description | Торгуем с ИИ🤖 По вопросам рекламы - @aitradi1 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vlogchain |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 29,078 | -106 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 29,184 | -35 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 29,219 | -20 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 29,239 | -48 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 29,287 | -49 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 29,336 | -39 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 29,375 | -30 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 29,405 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:08 | 29,420 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 29,433 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 29,446 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 29,463 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 29,479 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 29,492 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 29,499 | -19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 29,518 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 29,535 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 29,553 | -45 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 29,598 | -61 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 29,659 | first reading |
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.28%
- avg views ÷ 29,078 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 371
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.231%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (7 April 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,682 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,970
- Videos
- ≈371
- Links
- ≈1,910
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 56s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 37 | 94.9% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 5.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 43 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vlogchain. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
БИТОК ВООБЩЕ ОХУЕЛ 😂 За последнюю неделю рынок успели закидать таким количеством плохих новостей, что по классике $BTC должен был хотя бы нормально обосраться. Но биток просто сделал вид, что ничего не произошло. Плохие новости? Похуй. Страх? Похуй. Очередной конец крипты? Спасибо, следующий. И на этом фоне $BTC печатает новый максимум за 9 месяцев. Вот это мне нравится больше всего. Когда актив перестаёт падат…
КАК ЖЕ ВСЁ-ТАКИ ОХУЕННО ТЫКАТЬ FOMO С ТЕЛЕФОНА 😂 У меня сейчас основную торговлю уже забрали боты. Сами ищут. Сами думают. Сами торгуют. Человек в этой схеме нужен в основном, чтобы иногда посмотреть на результат и не мешать 😂 НО БЛЯТЬ. Когда в наш публичный канал прилетает алерт, что один из китов куда-то залетел на нормальную сумму — руки всё равно иногда чешутся. Открываешь FOMO с телефона. Посмотрел график. …
БИТКОИН УПЁРСЯ В ДВЕРЬ. 🚪 $BTC уже снова выше $81,000. Но самое интересное сейчас не то, что он вырос. А куда он пришёл. Перед нами две зоны: $83,000 — первый уровень, который надо нормально забрать и закрепить. Дальше — $88,000. И вот там уже будет весело. Пока биток ходит под сопротивлением, толпа будет каждый час переобуваться: красная свеча — «ВСЁ, ОТМЕНА БЫЧКИ» зелёная свеча — «100К ЗАВТРА» 😂 Мы этой ху…
🟢 ПО БИТКУ ЕСТЬ ОЧЕНЬ ХОРОШИЙ СИГНАЛ И дело даже не в том, что цена опять попёрла вверх. Важно, КТО её туда тащит. Предыдущий заход BTC к $82K во многом разгоняли фьючерсы — плечи, спекулянты, вот эта вся криптанская шайтан-машина. 😁 А сейчас картина интереснее: идёт сильный спрос именно на споте. То есть биток не просто пампят контрактами — его реально покупают. Почему это важно? Когда рост построен на фьюча…
🔥2
КОРОЧЕ, МЫ ТУТ СОБРАЛИ ЕЩЁ ОДНУ ШАЙТАН-МАШИНУ. И я уже сам немного охуеваю от того, во что это всё превращается 😂 Мы отобрали топовые кошельки и теперь следим не просто за тем, кто какую монету купил. Это было бы слишком просто. Система в реальном времени следит за изменениями портфелей всех наших китов: — кто начал набирать монету — кто увеличивает позицию — кто разгружается — где сразу несколько сильных кошель…
🔥1
ТЕМ ВРЕМЕНЕМ ФОНДОВЫЙ РЫНОК ПОТИХОНЬКУ ПЕРЕЕЗЖАЕТ В КРИПТУ 😂 Кстати, мало кто заметил, но на Fomo уже можно торговать не только нашими любимыми щитками. Там уже есть акции, индексы, золото, нефть и прочие взрослые финансовые штуки. NVIDIA хочешь? Пожалуйста. Google? На. S&P 500? Держи. А самое интересное — сейчас весь рынок довольно бодро идёт в сторону токенизации акций. То есть постепенно вся эта древняя конст…
БЛЯТЬ, КАК ЖЕ ВСЁ-ТАКИ ОХУЕННО ТОРГОВАТЬ НА FOMO 😂 По сути это социальная сеть для лудоманов. Открываешь монету — и прямо на графике видишь, кто где какой высер написал. Один доказывает, почему сейчас будет x10. Второй — почему эта хуйня через час будет стоить ноль. Третий уже купил и просто орёт «НЕ ПРОДАВАТЬ, БЛЯТЬ» 😂 Короче, TradingView скрестили с Twitter и добавили туда срач прямо на свечи. И самое прекрасн…
Рука дернулась, закрыл $PAID , показывал сделку в видео в инсте, около 3х профита🙄 брал по 11.5м по сигналу кита в этом канале 🚀
СЛЕДИМ ЗА КИТАМИ НА FOMO🐋 Моя ИИ запилила отдельный канал, куда теперь секунда в секунду летят их сделки прямо из ончейна. Кит закинул $50k в какую-нибудь очередную хуйню с капитализацией три доширака — мы уже знаем. Кто зашёл. Во что. На какую сумму. По какой цене. Никаких «наш аналитик заметил необычную активность». Блокчейн стуканул — канал сдал кита. 😂 🐋 Вот сама кормушка: https://t.me/fomows А мы тем врем…
РАНЬШЕ ТРЕЙДИНГ ВЫГЛЯДЕЛ КАК ВТОРАЯ РАБОТА. Открыл график. Посмотрел объёмы. OI. Фандинг. RSI. Ликвидации. Стаканы. Часовик. Четырёхчасовик. Потом ещё открыл три вкладки, забыл, нахуя открыл первую, и сидишь изображаешь из себя Bloomberg Terminal. 😂 А теперь у нас работает шайтан-машина. Я просто кидаю ей монету. Через несколько секунд она сама собирает полный расклад по рынку: — где стоят ликвидации шортов и л…
На луну, сучка🚀🚀🛰 Где торгую: 👍 Крипту на Bitunix | Мемы на FOMO 💰 Попасть в трейдинг клуб бесплатно
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @vlogchain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ИИ захватил мою жизнь, как и твою 🤪 но вместо того чтобы рисовать картинки, я решил обучать нейронку торговать😂 интересно что получилось? Ты уже потестил железяку на реальном Депе?
- Да, торгую с ИИ30%
- Еще нет, но интересно40%
- ИИ все сольет😱50%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚀В какой ракете сидишь?
- Набрал мешки в Лонг41%
- В Шорте12%
- Пока жду47%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хочешь научиться также ?
- Да😎61%
- Ниче не понимаю пока🥸42%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@investor_hamster · 43,955
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@telegacrypton · 106,700
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@Pepe_Drophanter · 51,312
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
@evgenahata · 101,266
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@combathamster · 63,675
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@crypadvis · 94,637
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@crypto_tappok · 82,989
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
@egocrypton · 435,123
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@incrypto_tg · 149,386
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@shkilmaksym · 228,867
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoPayk · 154,380
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@hamsterdropru · 57,250
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@cryptoosanya · 83,259
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
@deta1ka · 106,570
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
@smartest_official · 656,015
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@etatnews · 57,568
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Влогчейн” (@vlogchain), 29,078 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vlogchain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.