Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -5,194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82,480–89,232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:41
83,259
-182
15 Sept 2026, 15:20
83,441
-268
14 Sept 2026, 03:00
83,709
-235
12 Sept 2026, 06:58
83,944
-283
10 Sept 2026, 00:38
84,227
-495
6 Sept 2026, 16:42
84,722
-354
4 Sept 2026, 04:39
85,076
-181
2 Sept 2026, 21:08
85,257
-152
1 Sept 2026, 20:43
85,409
-188
31 Aug 2026, 19:38
85,597
-179
30 Aug 2026, 22:48
85,776
-104
29 Aug 2026, 22:23
85,880
-118
28 Aug 2026, 23:07
85,998
-120
27 Aug 2026, 23:05
86,118
-71
27 Aug 2026, 00:17
86,189
-115
26 Aug 2026, 00:28
86,304
-102
25 Aug 2026, 00:17
86,406
-156
23 Aug 2026, 12:36
86,562
-234
21 Aug 2026, 20:18
86,796
-112
20 Aug 2026, 17:46
86,908
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.298%
avg views ÷ 83,259 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.826%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
20 (22 October 2025 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
497
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 01:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,140
Videos
≈105
Links
≈1,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10
32.3%
👍
5
16.1%
🐳
4
12.9%
😍
4
12.9%
👌
3
9.68%
🤡
3
9.68%
👏
1
3.23%
🔥
1
3.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2025 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Про взлом Bitget, думаю, уже знаете — каждый паблик успел написать.
Но тут интереснее XMR. При крупных взломах хакерам нужно скрывать след средств, поэтому Monero часто оказывается в фокусе.
Посмотрите тайминги взлома и реакцию XMR после новости — полезный кейс для анализа на будущее, чтобы понимать, куда смотреть и что делать в подобных ситуациях.
🤑Забираем 140$ на прогнозы от MEXC
⚪️Завезли жирную активность, делаем до $1000 оборота и получаем до $140 в ваучерах по прогнозам. На $1000 оборота расходы выходят около $20, а получаем до $140 на ставки.
📝Что делаем?
⚫️Имеем/Регаем аккаунт
⚫️Подтверждаем участие
⚫️Депозит 105+ (+10$)
⚫️Оборот $100 / $500 / $1000 на прогнозах
⚫️Забираем ваучеры в Reward Hub / Prediction Market
🔸Считает открытие и закрытие. Можно …
Какая же скучная хуйня в последнее время - рынок.
В крипте ничего интересного не происходит, волатильности нет.
В общем, очень скучно.
А это в то время, когда я настроен на крупную покупку эфира. А он все не идет туда где я хочу его покупать. Просто стоит на месте.
Короче, крипта бесит максимально.
Пусть уже или дадут хорошую свечу на 2500$ по эфиру или пусть он ебанется на 1400. Мне одинаково хочется увидеть эти …
Получаем до 50$+50$ за друга от Wallet 🥰
В официальном кошельке от Telegram запустили акцию, в которой можно получить до 50$ за себя + до 50$ за реферала (реферал тоже получает).
Что нужно сделать❓
1️⃣Переходим по ССЫЛКЕ
2️⃣Делаем депозит 50$+
3️⃣Покупаем крипту на 50$+
4️⃣Сохраняем баланс 50$+ в течение 7 дней
5️⃣Кликаем в кошельке по баннеру, как на скриншоте, и там берем реферал.
Дополнительно за эти задания мы…
Получаем $WLFI от ByBit 🤑
👧 Ребята сделали пул в 45кк токенов (~2.7кк$), которые мы можем разделить за холд $USD1.
👉Покупаем на бирже $USD1
👉Держии стейбл на спотовом балансе
🚨Важно:
— Снимки происходят каждый час, учитывается наименьшее значение
— APR гибкий, но думаю ниже 15% не уйдет
— Награды приходят каждый день
Telegram развернул 48 валидаторов в сети TON, отправив в стейкинг почти 100 млн TON со своего баланса.
При текущем курсе это даёт потенциал более $30 млн в год только на стейкинге.
Интересно, чем дальше удивит Дурикович 🐧🐧
🤑Лутаем 18$ со стейкинга Binance
🟡Сейчас на Binance в Simple Earn можно застейкать $NIGHT под 200% и получить за 7 дней ~18$
📝Что делаем?
⚫️Имеем аккаунт Binance
⚫️Покупаем 10к $NIGHT и хеджим позу фьючами шорт с х1 плечом, чтоб не потерять на курсе
⚫️Идем в simple earn и стейкаем
🔸У кого нет акции, нужно сделать трейд на 50$ и должно появиться. Следите за фандингом, ищите биржи где его нет
Смотрю, в криптотвиттере снова начали активно ждать альтсезон.
Текущую динамику соотношения капитализации альткоинов (без топ-10) к BTC уже сравнивают с циклами 2017 и 2021 годов.
Типа структура графика почти такая же, а значит скоро может начаться тот самый момент, когда альты начинают делать по +300-500%, пока биток просто стоит и смотрит.
Звучит, конечно, красиво.
Но мы с вами уже знаем, как обычно заканчиваютс…
⛰Биржа MEXC запускает P2P с отрицательной комиссией — такого ещё не было
Теперь сделки за RUB могут приносить не расходы, а бонус. Да, вы всё правильно поняли — платформа фактически доплачивает за торговлю.
🔵 В чём суть?
В разделе MEXC P2P появилась возможность получать кэшбэк до −3% от суммы операции. Обмениваете крипту на рубли — часть средств возвращается вам в виде вознаграждения.
💡 Условия простые:
🔵 Новичк…
🧸 #Grass Началась 16-я Эпоха :3
Много писал про этот проект можете потыкать по хэштегам, сам до сих пор фармлю, новостей никаких нету
🔵 Ссылка на фарм Grass
Будем надеется что это последняя эпоха, так что ждем дроп. Но есть подозрения что они еще не раз перенесут.
В Москве недавно прошла ежегодная премия Crypto Awards 🏆
Формат заметно отличается от привычных крипто-конференций:
меньше официальных речей, больше живого общения, атмосфера праздника, красивые гости, угощения и лёгкий нетворкинг.
Одной из самых обсуждаемых стала номинация:
⚡ «Лучшая криптобиржа для российских пользователей»
По итогам голосования победу в ней получила биржа MEXC. 🍾
Интересный факт: это уже не пе…
Какая же помойка
Сегодня вышел очередной гавно проект, который моментально же и рагнулся, за полчаса -80% цены
Видимо игровые платформы уже мертвы, т.к я давно не видел настолько сильного рага…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoosanya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptoosanya named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@goi_trade named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
@hashonbread named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
@kosolapiy_crypt0 named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRYPTO DZEN @cryptodzenq · 48,348 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Владиславский 🌌 @vladiiiiken · 204,586 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 September 2026
SAID RAGIMOV CRYPTO @saidragimov · 39,411 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 30 August 2026
Щитпост @shitock · 435,847 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КриптоСаня” (@cryptoosanya), 83,259 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoosanya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.