🔼Solana впервые превзошла NYSE по числу сделок За неделю DEX в сети Solana обработали около 208 млн спотовых сделок против примерно 190 млн на NYSE — при этом речь именно о количестве операций, а не об их денежном объёме. Биржи: GoSwap no KYC

Channel
Фармим Web3 🐹
@farmingweb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,679subscribers
-1,489 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001313439342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @farmingweb |
| Description | Рассказываем, как ЗАРАБОТАТЬ на дропах, NFT, DePIN, тестнетах, нодах и мем-коинах. Реклама: @archivedadmin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/farmingweb |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 27,679 | -196 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 27,875 | -69 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 27,944 | -69 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 28,013 | -65 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 28,078 | -55 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 28,133 | -101 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 28,234 | -82 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 28,316 | -38 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 28,354 | -47 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 28,401 | -26 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:46 | 28,427 | -30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 28,457 | -31 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 28,488 | -36 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 28,524 | -28 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 28,552 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 28,581 | -28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 28,609 | -31 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 28,640 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 28,657 | -48 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 28,705 | first reading |
Engagement
125 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.03%
- avg views ÷ 27,679 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 286
- 48 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.82%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 48
- of 125 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 125 (30 July 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 13,707 |
| Reactions total | 123 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 19:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,330
- Videos
- ≈538
- Links
- ≈1,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 48s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
123 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 51.2% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 43.9% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.44% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.63% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
‼️ Bitget подтвердила крупный взлом С биржи вывели активы примерно на $351,6 млн, после чего Bitget временно приостановила вывод средств; компания заявляет, что холодные кошельки и большая часть активов не пострадали, а ущерб полностью покрывает фонд защиты пользователей на сумму более $464 млн. Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
💰 BlackRock видит потенциал ИИ-агентов для крипторынка Компания считает, что автономные ИИ-агенты могут стать новым источником спроса на стейблкоины и блокчейн-платежи, поскольку им потребуется самостоятельно и круглосуточно оплачивать данные, вычисления и цифровые услуги. Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
✔️ Binance листит токен Hyperliquid Binance открыла спотовые торги HYPE сегодня в 11:00 UTC с парами HYPE/USDT, HYPE/USDC и HYPE/TRY, при этом токен получил Seed Tag из-за повышенной волатильности и рисков. Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
‼️ Binance прекращает работу с гривной через Fiat Trade С 28 сентября биржа остановит ввод и вывод UAH через Fiat Trade и удалит пару USDT/UAH, а оставшиеся подходящие гривневые балансы автоматически конвертируют в USDT по курсу 46,5 грн за USDT. Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
😋TRON правит бал в Европе: USDT-платежи бьют рекорды на Coinsbee! Европейский шопинг говорит на языке TRON! Популярная платформа Coinsbee назвала USDT (TRON) самым востребованным инструментом для оплаты покупок. Блокчейн-гигант в очередной раз доказал: когда речь заходит о быстрых, дешевых и комфортных микротранзакциях, конкурентов у TRON просто нет. 👉TRON DAO RU(конкурсы и призы) #TronGlobalFriends #TGF
🔥7❤3
💰 Binance усиливает ставку на USDC Binance инвестировала $100 млн в Circle и продлила партнёрство на пять лет, чтобы расширить использование USDC на своей глобальной платформе, особенно в развивающихся странах, для сбережений, инвестиций и платежей. Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
🔼Bitcoin ETF показали рекордный приток Спотовые Bitcoin ETF 21 сентября получили около $999 млн чистого притока — это крупнейший дневной показатель с октября 2025 года, когда Bitcoin находился у исторических максимумов. Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
💰 Hyperliquid стал самым прибыльным криптопроектом года С начала 2026 года Hyperliquid заработал уже $429млн выручки — больше любого другого криптопроекта без учета эмитентов стейблкоинов На втором месте Pump.fun с $322млн Плечи и лудомания снова оказались самым стабильным бизнесом рынка😂
🔴В 2026 году наши граждане уже заработали более 10 миллиардов рублей на Арбитраже криптовалют По данным Минфин 23% людей уже покинули свое место работы, поскольку в среднем уже в первый месяц тут можно зарабатывать более 140 тысяч рублей, а через пару месяцев с легкостью выйти на семизначные суммы! Самое смешное, что лишь 10% людей что-то слышали об этой профессии, хотя все обучающие материалы бесплатно лежат на ка…
✔️ Circle запустила кредитование под Bitcoin Институциональные клиенты Circle теперь могут использовать BTC и другие поддерживаемые активы в качестве залога для займов в USDC через собственный Smart Wallet и DeFi-протоколы. Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
👋Один против всех: TRON собрал больше ликвидности, чем девять конкурентов из топ-10 вместе взятых Пока другие блокчейны делят остатки рынка, TRON просто забирает всю главную ликвидность. По данным Token Terminal, за последние 90 дней капитализация стейблкоинов в сети взлетела на $4,8 миллиарда, оставив позади совокупный результат девяти топовых сетей. TRON продолжает доказывать свое железобетонное лидерство, предла…
🔥5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @farmingweb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@crypadvis · 94,637#1
@evgenahata · 101,266#2
@Pepe_Drophanter · 51,312#3
@investor_hamster · 43,955#4
@CryptoPayk · 154,380#5
@hamster_comboref · 15,629#6
@combathamster · 63,675#7
@eeusd · 1,133,430#8
@hamster_homyaks · 10,378#9
@hamsterdropru · 57,250#10
@mrgribooss · 757#11
@tu_airdrops_daily · 63,941#12
@crypta · 537,989#13
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,171,582#14
@telegacrypton · 106,700#15
@shkilmaksym · 228,867#16
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#17
@thecryptoff · 23,056#18
@vestirussia · 975,954#19
@playweb4 · 143,104#20
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#21
@rilcrypto · 75,425#22
@invest_zonaa · 909,960#23
@tonfo · 139,619#24
@alexatamcrypto · 38,802#25
@thetamaxxing · 36,578#26
@onerussia · 1,392,766#27
@RustonCrypto · 21,912#28
@DollarCryptan · 11,033#29
@crypto_t_g · 8,971#30
@freee_crypts · 13,488#31
@eduardinvest · 1,354,680#32
@finansist_busines · 620,476#33
@keeper_cis · 454,524#34
@incrypto_tg · 149,386#35
@crypburg · 152,798#36
@hmstr_kombat_bot · 25,753#37
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780#38
@hamster_kombat · 20,830,171#39
@notcoin · 8,552,225#40
@Anton_cryptoo · 143,782#41
@lostdogscoru · 215,203#42
@cultofnot · 1,020,011#43
@rusbizrus · 16,422#44
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,507,910#45
@builders · 3,409,127#46
@tons_base · 481,242#47
@crypto_jeman · 659,337#48
@crypto_vestnic · 208,013#49
@palitra97 · 4,788#50
@iamalexfalcon · 3,054,448#51
@durov · 10,721,399#52
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#53
@realgoats_channel · 4,621,170#54
@insideorg · 563#55
@Kripto_Azbuk · 293,747#56
@dogs · 7,065,215#57
@catizenann · 3,550,802#58
@hotonnear · 4,631,154#59
@catapult_extreme · 8,398,685#60
@Cats_housewtf · 7,850,625#61
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#62
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#63
@theyescoin · 5,634,397#64
@num1_ch · 391,865#65
@gram · 6,641,039#66
@trendingapps · 3,784,156#67
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,213,111#68
@pocketfi · 1,799,855#69
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#70
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pushvpn_proxy · 32,007
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
@telegacrypton · 106,700
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@Pepe_Drophanter · 51,312
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
@crypto_tappok · 82,989
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
@evgenahata · 101,266
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@crypadvis · 94,637
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@borov_club · 94,227
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 September 2026
@investor_hamster · 43,955
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@saidragimov · 39,411
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 30 August 2026
@shkilmaksym · 228,867
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@astahov_sklad · 22,449
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
@combathamster · 63,675
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@incrypto_tg · 149,386
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@karabinincome · 23,496
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
@CryptoPayk · 154,380
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@deta1echka · 26,091
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
@cryproseries · 39,305
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 29 August 2026
@kr1pt0_skuf · 57,113
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
@egocrypton · 435,123
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@thecryptoff · 23,056
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
@thetamaxxing · 36,578
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
@CryptoDvisj · 292,441
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
@RustonCrypto · 21,912
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 September 2026
@milliardom · 1,217,559
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фармим Web3 🐹” (@farmingweb), 27,679 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farmingweb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.