Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 25 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @rilcrypto — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far below this size band
252 average views per post against 75,425 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.335%. Across the 8,376 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.02% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
303 of 303 published in the window (303 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
76,481
Mature posts only
0.357% over 224 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source · err_low, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4,875. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74,694–81,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 05:18
75,425
-229
16 Sept 2026, 01:00
75,654
-201
14 Sept 2026, 09:39
75,855
-212
12 Sept 2026, 19:16
76,067
-237
10 Sept 2026, 22:00
76,304
-336
8 Sept 2026, 00:20
76,640
-349
5 Sept 2026, 01:38
76,989
-181
3 Sept 2026, 09:44
77,170
-136
2 Sept 2026, 05:05
77,306
-129
1 Sept 2026, 04:06
77,435
-154
31 Aug 2026, 02:34
77,589
-151
29 Aug 2026, 22:58
77,740
-147
28 Aug 2026, 21:34
77,887
-104
28 Aug 2026, 01:02
77,991
-102
27 Aug 2026, 03:11
78,093
-107
26 Aug 2026, 04:22
78,200
-135
25 Aug 2026, 06:28
78,335
-120
24 Aug 2026, 03:13
78,455
-193
22 Aug 2026, 12:25
78,648
-180
21 Aug 2026, 05:57
78,828
first reading
Engagement
531 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.336%
avg views ÷ 75,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
253
303 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
303
of 531 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 52 of 303 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
531 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
76,763
Reactions total
224
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 01:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,630
Videos
≈407
Links
≈2,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
26s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
224 reactions across 49 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
103
46.0%
❤
91
40.6%
🫡
9
4.02%
🤯
8
3.57%
😁
5
2.23%
😱
5
2.23%
😢
3
1.34%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 531 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 531 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☀️ Доброе утро!
📈 Сегодня основные альты торгуются в плюсе.
🟠 BTC торгуется около 84,020$
🪙 Доминация BTC — 59,11%
🪙 ETH торгуется около 2,687$
Индекс страха и жадности равен 72 пунктам и держится на уровне «Жадность».
Подборка важных новостей:
1️⃣ Пользователь Reddit создал игру, в которой можно искать на огромной свалке жёсткий диск Джеймса Хауэллса с ключами от 8000 BTC — подробнее
2️⃣ CEO BitGet Грейси Ч…
🔥 Bitget возобновит вывод средств с 28 сентября.
График восстановления выводов (время московское):
28 сентября, 11:00 — BTC в сети Bitcoin
29 сентября, 11:00 — ETH в сетях Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, Base и Optimism
30 сентября, 11:00 — USDT в сетях Ethereum, BSC, Solana и Tron
2 октября, 11:00 — остальные токены, фиатные средства и P2P
Дополнительная информация:
• Уязвимость обнаружена и устранена.
• Bitget про…
🇷🇴 В Румынии доноров крови привлекают к покупке гособлигаций повышенной доходностью.
Минфин предлагает им льготные условия.
В сентябре доноры могли приобрести двухлетние бумаги с доходностью 7,3% годовых в леях — на процентный пункт выше стандартной ставки.
Минимальный порог вложений для них был в десять раз ниже.
Чтобы воспользоваться предложением, нужно сдать кровь, получить подтверждение и купить облигации на …
🟠 Аналитики CryptoQuant считают, что в ближайшее время Биткоин может скорректироваться.
Нереализованная прибыль держателей BTC, купивших монеты 1–3 месяца назад, достигла 33% — максимума с декабря 2024 года.
За последние сутки инвесторы зафиксировали чистую прибыль в размере 25 700 BTC, что стало рекордом с начала 2026 года.
По оценке аналитиков, сочетание высокой бумажной прибыли и активной фиксации дохода может …
🛒 Часть средств Tether оказалась заблокирована на фоне угрозы ликвидации банка.
Минюст США добивается конфискации около $84 млн, изъятых со счетов платежной компании Capstone в Wells Fargo и JPMorgan.
Capstone обрабатывала платежи клиентов карибского EQIBank. Среди них был Tether: через Capstone проходили сотни миллионов долларов, связанных с Tether и Bitfinex.
Средства изъяли еще летом, однако о связи этой истори…
🇷🇺 Компаниям без опыта работы в легальном финансовом секторе будет сложнее выйти на регулируемый крипторынок.
Об этом заявил первый зампред ЦБ РФ Владимир Чистюхин, отметив, что таким организациям незнакомы требования регуляторов и порядок взаимодействия с ними.
🟠 Разработчики предложили способ совершать приватные переводы BTC в сети Биткоина без софтфорка.
Проект Shielded Bitcoin предусматривает публикацию в блокчейне зашифрованных данных о переводах. Их достоверность можно проверить с помощью доказательств с нулевым разглашением, при этом суммы и адреса получателей останутся скрытыми.
Однако время перевода и транзакция, в которую включены данные, будут видны. Подробности…
🇷🇺 В России планируют установить требования к сервисам, которые проверяют криптовалютные операции на предмет незаконного происхождения.
Над правилами работают Минфин, Банк России и Росфинмониторинг.
Такие компании должны будут быть зарегистрированы в России, а их программное обеспечение — пройти необходимую сертификацию.
📊 Santiment: Доля ETH на криптобиржах опустилась до минимального уровня за всю историю наблюдений, начиная с первых лет существования Ethereum.
На отслеживаемых площадках хранится лишь 3,49% от общего предложения ETH.
Около 35% монет размещены в стейкинге, а в DeFi-протоколах сети Ethereum заблокировано примерно $53 млрд.
‼️ Bitget Wallet заявила, что инцидент на бирже Bitget не затронул ее сервис и средства пользователей.
Кошелек работает независимо от биржи и не хранит активы клиентов: они остаются в блокчейне под контролем владельцев.
После дополнительной проверки команда подтвердила, что сервис функционирует в обычном режиме.
Пользователям посоветовали остерегаться фишинговых сообщений и получать информацию только из официальны…
⚡️ Bitget покроет убытки от инцидента с горячим кошельком за счет фонда защиты пользователей.
В резерве — 5500 BTC, что по текущему курсу составляет около $464 млн.
Адреса кошельков фонда можно проверить в блокчейне.
После оценки ущерба биржа намерена пополнить резерв и сообщить подробности о компенсациях.
🤝 Глава Bybit предложил Bitget помощь в расследовании инцидента.
Сооснователь и генеральный директор Bybit Бен Чжоу заявил, что команда биржи готова подключиться к расследованию.
Для этого Bybit обновляет платформу Lazarus Bounty, которая помогает отслеживать перемещение похищенных средств.
Чжоу напомнил, что Bitget поддержала Bybit после взлома, и выразил готовность ответить взаимностью.
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 531 posts we hold for @rilcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto🪼Движ @CryptoDvisj · 292,441 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Crypto Compass @top_crypto_compass · 40,511 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Tap Sport (RU) @tapsport_game · 90,704 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
КРИПТОКОНСУЛЬТАНТ - криптовалюта, инвестиции, деньги @cryptoconsultantonline · 92,930 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
ТОНИКС @inTonX · 166,532 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
CRYPTO EXTRASIDE @crypto_extraside · 412,509 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
💎 Web3 Profit💎 @Web3profits · 223,483 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
MR TONY 💎 @mr_tony · 253,115 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
TU Airdrop Daily @tu_airdrops_daily · 63,941 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Smartest Community @smartest_official · 656,015 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
100F | Crypto Club @Crypto_Clab_100F · 22,368 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 September 2026
theta maxxing @thetamaxxing · 36,578 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
Дропы хомяка @hamsterdropru · 57,250 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
The Whale Post @thecryptoff · 23,056 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
Ruston @RustonCrypto · 21,912 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 September 2026
BigWin 💎 Luxury Girl @bigwin · 31,454 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
КриптоТапок @crypto_tappok · 82,989 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
TONomania | Crypto @T0Nomania · 154,658 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Degen Degenovich @degenovich · 110,457 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
CRYPTO FREEDOM🗽 @freedomcrypte · 20,591 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 26 September 2026
МЕТОД ТРЕЙДЕРА @Tradmethod · 103,062 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 September 2026
GEO VAXUE @geovaxueworld · 210,536 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Tap Swap Code ⚡️⚡️⚡️ TapSwap Коды @tapswapcodeg · 36,076 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
Юнит • Системщики Профита 🔥 Весь мир, как офис @demwinner · 188,826 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 173 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Реальная Крипта” (@rilcrypto), 75,425 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rilcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.