Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1,686. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,877–46,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:01
44,130
-34
15 Sept 2026, 13:18
44,164
-41
14 Sept 2026, 00:40
44,205
-66
12 Sept 2026, 10:39
44,271
-64
10 Sept 2026, 04:38
44,335
-140
6 Sept 2026, 20:20
44,475
-184
4 Sept 2026, 04:38
44,659
-29
2 Sept 2026, 19:28
44,688
-51
1 Sept 2026, 17:14
44,739
-26
31 Aug 2026, 13:43
44,765
-45
30 Aug 2026, 15:52
44,810
-29
29 Aug 2026, 13:18
44,839
-24
28 Aug 2026, 12:32
44,863
-26
27 Aug 2026, 09:14
44,889
-31
26 Aug 2026, 12:38
44,920
-27
25 Aug 2026, 09:02
44,947
-25
24 Aug 2026, 10:15
44,972
-52
22 Aug 2026, 18:37
45,024
-62
21 Aug 2026, 12:18
45,086
-69
20 Aug 2026, 12:23
45,155
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.58%
avg views ÷ 44,130 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,460
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held
22 (27 January 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total
19,690
Reactions total
236
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 22:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,280
Videos
≈172
Links
≈896
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 18s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,204 reactions across 22 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💩
1,204
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,204 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 22 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MasterRingo10. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2026 to 10 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
СЕРВИС ДЛЯ АВТО ПОИСКА ЮТУБ НИШ 🎞
Мы с командой почти закончили разработку сервиса, который сам ищет ютуб ниши, анализирует их и делает выводы стоит ли в них сейчас заходить конкретно тебе или нет
Сделали его в первую очередь для себя и сейчас вовсю пользуемся, уже подняли несколько каналов в нашей сетке
Сейчас докручиваем сервис для публичного доступа
Предварительную демку видете на видео выше
А без блюра показа…
НА ВСТРЕЧУ СО МНОЙ ПОЙДЁШЬ?)
правда онлайн
Три дня в прямом эфире – концентрат пользы, эмоций и подарков, которых никогда до этого не делали!!
Намечаем тусу в честь юбилей нашей ютуб школы Разгон - нам 1 год!
Отмечать будем дико 🤪
Разложу по шагам систему, которая принесла мне $2 000 000 на YouTube, чтобы её можно было повторить на своём канале
А теперь самое вкусное! Бонусы за регистрацию, но в бесплатном доступе…
КАК МОНЕТИЗИРОВАТЬ ИИ КОНТЕНТ НА ЮТУБЕ 🤖
Многие слышали про то, что ии контент не монетизируется
Но это не так, если контент не нарушает правила ютуба, которые нельзя было нарушать и до нейросетей
Просто люди, дорвавшись до такого простого инструмента, начали генерировать все подряд и публиковать это на ютуб в надежде срубить кеш, но не разбираясь в правилах
Конечно, они наполучали демонетизаций, блокировок и пошли…
ЧТО ДЕЛАТЬ, КОГДА ВСЕ УСКОРЯЕТСЯ 😰
Если вы думаете, что в мире все довольно быстро, то в мире контента и соц сетей скорость Х100
Поэтому адаптироваться надо быстро и сейчас эта скорость высока как никогда раньше
И мы с командой почти каждые 2 месяца перестраиваем многие процессы в нашей сети каналов
А за это лето и вовсе перестроили почти всю экономику 👨💻
Все что применяем и срабатывает мы сразу упаковываем в на…
Бесплатная автоматизация создания контента это миф или реальность? 🤔
Сейчас можно почти все сделать руками и за довольно дешево
Но как только речь заходит про то, чтобы система, ии агент или кто то это делал за тебя, то сразу все упирается в кеш
Ну или часто в токены, кредиты, подписки и т.д.
Отсюда и мысль, что все что авматизировано - дорого
Я соглашусь с этим наполовину
Здесь как и в жизни. Сначала вы делаете ч…
Автоматический поиск ниш на ютубе
Номер 1 проблема для новичка - ниша
Нельзя снимать на один канал все подряд, алгоритмы не поймут кому вас рекомендовать, поэтому надо выбрать нишу
Другими словами это тема роликов
Но найти ее и понять, где сейчас хорошая точка входа, где новички активно растут - это сложная задача, если у вас не было успешного опыта на ютубе
Если кратко, то надо серчить ютуб, формировать ленту рек…
ЗАБУДЬТЕ ПРО МОНТАЖ - ТЕПЕРЬ ВСЕ ДЕЛАЕТСЯ ЗА ВАС
Судя по тому сколько меня не было в канале и при этом сколько реакций набрал прошлый пост - могу сказать, что тема с автоматическим созданием контент вам зашла
И это радует ❤️
Вчера я лишь рассказал про существование метода с автоматическим мотажем качественного контента
А сейчас показываю как это делать:
1️⃣Сначал выбираем нишу на ютубе (пишите, если тема ниш интер…
АВТОМАТИЗАЦИЯ ОТ СОЗДАНИЯ ВИДЕО ДО МОНТАЖА
Меня давненько не было, т.к мы с командой много работаем 👨💻
На рынке контента происходят интересные изменения и мы их сразу внедряем в нашу сеть ютуб каналов
Сейчас плотно работаем над автоматизацией создания видео, т.к наконец то все подходит к такому уровню, что это реально помогает, а не просто модная, не работающая херня
В части наших каналов используется живой конте…
КАК СЕЙЧАС РАБОТАЕТ ИИ КОНТЕНТ НА САМОМ ДЕЛЕ
Если 2 года назад нейронки в контенте только мешали, то год назад уже стали полезными
Но создать интересный и осознанный контент с их помощью было сложно, поэтому образовался тот самый ИИ слоп (тупой, шаблонный контент)
Сейчас же очень легко создавать вовлекающий, интересный контент на любом языке 🍔
Причем не только развлекательный, но и полезный и продающий, да какой хо…
ЧЕМ ЖИВУ, ГДЕ ПРОПАДАЮ
За этот год в этом тг канале вышло буквально 20-30 постов
Необычно, учитывая, что каналу пару лет и за это время тут вышло их больше 2000
Надо с этим че то делать
Предлагаю так
Я рассказываю че куда каво и вы мне тоже самое, но про себя
Договор? 🤝
Стартую
Я в этом году сфокусировался только на том, от чего меня прет, а именно:
🎞Строим свою сеть ютуб каналов без лица и если я этим занималс…
ДОСТУП К CLAUDE ИЗ РФ 🤖
А также к другим нейронкам ChatGPT, GROK, GEMINI (NANOBANANA)
Сейчас есть несколько способов как можно купить подписку на любой сервис и в основном это:
Либо завести виртуальную зарубежную карту, но там норм так комиссии
Либо искать продавца на всяких маркетплейсах, кто вам продаст аккаунт с подпиской, но там много танцев с бубном и скама
Но оба случая не совсем удобны, где то переплата лют…
🔔 Видели ИИ-блогеров в ленте? На них тоже можно заработать
ИИ-блогеры уже не уступают обычным авторам: они собирают сотни тысяч подписчиков, продвигают реальные бренды и приносят доход.
🎤 Недавно Артём Слабун, автор канала MasterRingo, рассказал, как создаёт ИИ-блогеров с нуля и монетизирует их с РСЯ для блогеров.
Спросили у блогера, как устроен такой контент — от генерации персонажа до монетизации контента.
🎙 В …
💩20
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @MasterRingo10. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Монетизация нейронок (как их применить для заработка)64%
Создание контента (Ютуб, ТикТок, UGC, ИИ блогеры и т.д)42%
Промты и работа с нейронками (как правильно писать, какие нейронки для чего лучше подходят и т.д)33%
Автоматизация и боты40%
Лучшие ИИ инструменты (разборы разных нейронок и их возможностей с идеями применения)30%
The shares total 209%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 10 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Bitch @cryptobitchfree · 39,936 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Bounty Play @bounty_play · 52,864 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 28 August 2026
SPACE ADVENTURE 🛰️ @space_adventure_game · 86,298 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 28 August 2026
ЖВБ – Фриланс и отзывы за деньги @zarabotok_na_otzivahhh · 47,209 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 11 here — alongside 10 others — read 26 August 2026
ГИРЯЕВ PRO @giryaevpro · 26,719 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 11 September 2026
Деньги Есть! 🏆 dengi4444 @dengi4444 · 24,048 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Удалёнка 24/7 @worko_com · 181,831 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MasterRingo” (@MasterRingo10), 44,130 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MasterRingo10.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.