Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 42 days, net +132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,306–29,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 23:00
29,462
-8
15 Sept 2026, 02:57
29,470
-5
13 Sept 2026, 09:14
29,475
-12
11 Sept 2026, 11:58
29,487
+4
8 Sept 2026, 16:58
29,483
+23
5 Sept 2026, 07:15
29,460
+6
3 Sept 2026, 12:00
29,454
+14
1 Sept 2026, 10:36
29,440
-2
30 Aug 2026, 15:07
29,442
+9
29 Aug 2026, 11:55
29,433
+6
28 Aug 2026, 13:08
29,427
-4
27 Aug 2026, 13:08
29,431
-3
26 Aug 2026, 14:38
29,434
-8
25 Aug 2026, 13:32
29,442
-4
24 Aug 2026, 11:54
29,446
+2
21 Aug 2026, 09:28
29,444
+3
20 Aug 2026, 10:03
29,441
+37
19 Aug 2026, 08:58
29,404
+7
18 Aug 2026, 10:23
29,397
+6
17 Aug 2026, 11:33
29,391
first reading
Engagement
282 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 29,462 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,800
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 282 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 101 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
282 (4 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
387,637
Reactions total
8,735
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,690
Videos
≈863
Links
≈3,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 56m
Average length
5m 30s
Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,435 reactions across 261 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,490
25.6%
👍
4,591
21.4%
👏
3,722
17.4%
🤬
2,738
12.8%
🔥
1,250
5.83%
😁
742
3.46%
🙏
364
1.70%
😡
360
1.68%
😈
336
1.57%
😢
270
1.26%
🥰
210
0.98%
😱
195
0.91%
🤔
182
0.849%
💯
178
0.83%
🙈
178
0.83%
😭
149
0.695%
😨
80
0.373%
🤯
50
0.233%
👌
46
0.215%
🥴
45
0.21%
25 further kinds
259
1.21%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 281 of the 282 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,741 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 282 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.709%
2 of 282 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,510
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,210
over 280 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
alreflusso
2
17 August 2026
14 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 282 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
RIVELAZIONE CHOC AL SENATO: I pediatri ricevono BONUS per vaccinare i vostri figli... e scaricano la vostra famiglia se dite NO!
In una testimonianza esplosiva davanti alla sottocommissione del senatore Ron Johnson, Polly Tommey e il dottor Brian Hooker hanno smascherato il racket dei vaccini:
I pediatri intascano bonus tra i 200 e i 600 dollari PER BAMBINO per raggiungere le quote vaccinali. Alcuni arrivano a guad…
Incentivi ai pediatri
Anche in Italia. Qui un esempio, per vaccino respiratorio sinciziale in Veneto 10 euro per ogni puntura, ma per avere i soldi il pediatra deve vaccinarne almeno 80 %.
Mamme sappiatelo quando ve lo propongono!
https://bur.regione.veneto.it/BurvServices/pubblica/Download.aspx?name=Dgr_1326_25_AllegatoA_568726.pdf&type=9&storico=False
☄️Uno studio che ha coinvolto 1,7 milioni di bambini ha rilevato che miocardite e pericardite sono state osservate solo nei bambini che avevano ricevuto il vaccino a mRNA contro il COVID-19.
✔️ Nessuno dei bambini non vaccinati in questo gruppo ha manifestato problemi cardiaci.
🌷🌷🌷🌷
Canali di qualità, canali da vedere.. e magari a cui aggiungersi
🌠 @MedicinaEmozionale
🌠 👉 ingleseolistico
🌠 https://t.me/dottgabrieleprinzi_official
MESSAGGIO PER LE FAMIGLIE E I SOSTENITORI DELLA REGIONE SICILIA
📣📣📣📣📣📣📣📣📣📣📣📣
Carissimi,
Vi informiamo che l'Associazione COMILVA ha inviato una lettera ufficiale alle istituzioni e autorità competenti della Regione Sicilia (Assessorato alla Salute, Assessorato alla Famiglia, Ufficio Scolastico Regionale e Ordini dei Medici) per fare chiarezza sulla recente circolare regionale relativa all'applicazione della Legge 119…
"COLON (intestino prego!) IRRITABILE".
Sapevi che c'è una dieta CONSIGLIATA da 7 società specialistiche italiane?
Sapevi che questi consigli sono nelle linee guida italiane (scopiazzate a quelle americane) del 2022?
Se hai questa informazione, e trovassi qualcuno che ti dice che hai il "colon irritabile " e te lo devi tenere, risponderei citando le linee guida italiane ...
Trovi le linee guida (anche alimentari)…
#ChildResQue 🌍🇮🇹
🔥PERCHÉ UNA GRAVIDANZA DÀ TANTO FASTIDIO?
In Piemonte il progetto “Vita Nascente” è stato creato per sostenere concretamente le donne incinte in difficoltà, intervenendo anche sulle condizioni economiche e sociali che potrebbero portarle a interrompere la gravidanza.
Secondo i dati riportati dalla Regione Piemonte, nelle prime tre edizioni il progetto ha sostenuto 1.226 nascite.
Eppure l'iniziati…
PROMEMORIA PER OGGI POMERIGGIO
Domenica 20 settembre 2026 alle ore 17h all'interno del Dazio in Piazza Sempione a Milano (consigliato arrivare 15 minuti prima)
Se non hai prenotato
👇👇👇
https://mypersonaltrainer.hostspot.it/sessione/b0f8ee87-f543-4e18-97c9-897135be2ac5
Ci vediamo li👋
#dottgabrieleprinzi #latuasalutevale #panzane
T.me/dottgabrieleprinzi_official
Adesso salta fuori anche sul British Medical Journal
Che degli scienziati avevano fatto notare che il sistema di rilevazione dei “segnali” di effetti avversi adottato da FDA e CDC era incapace di segnalare persino la miocardite e che esistevano altri metodi più efficaci.
https://www.bmj.com/content/394/bmj-2026-100806
In particolare il rapporto di proporzionalità tra effetti avversi degli anti-COVID e quelli di t…
🤬62❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 282 posts we hold for @dottgabrieleprinzi_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
IppocrateOrg @IppocrateOrg · 34,479 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Protocolli CDS @protocolliCDS · 42,240 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
Dr. Cristina Tomasi @drcristinatomasi · 28,280 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎” (@dottgabrieleprinzi_official), 29,462 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dottgabrieleprinzi_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.