Channel
@fratotolo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,540subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001327462805 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fratotolo |
| Created | 23 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fratotolo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 9,540 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 9,545 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 9,549 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 9,547 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 9,547 | first reading |
124 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 124 (3 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 170,778 |
| Reactions total | 12,911 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,911 reactions across 124 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 3,340 | 25.9% | |
| 🤡 | 1,295 | 10.0% | |
| 🤬 | 1,170 | 9.06% | |
| 👏 | 1,015 | 7.86% | |
| 🔥 | 929 | 7.20% | |
| 🤣 | 914 | 7.08% | |
| 👍 | 865 | 6.70% | |
| 🤮 | 715 | 5.54% | |
| 😁 | 503 | 3.90% | |
| 🖕 | 465 | 3.60% | |
| 🍌 | 389 | 3.01% | |
| 💯 | 168 | 1.30% | |
| 😡 | 157 | 1.22% | |
| ❤ | 138 | 1.07% | |
| 🙈 | 99 | 0.767% | |
| 🤷♀ | 95 | 0.736% | |
| 🍾 | 71 | 0.55% | |
| 🤯 | 69 | 0.534% | |
| 🌚 | 63 | 0.488% | |
| 💊 | 48 | 0.372% | |
| 37 further kinds | 403 | 3.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,911reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Se, al posto di Ranucci vittima dell’attentato, ci fosse stato un giornalista di destra, i giornali dem avrebbero utilizzato la stessa linea editoriale iper garantista? E soprattutto, Report come avrebbe trattato la vicenda? https://x.com/fratotolo2/status/2088532994852028424?s=46&t=sUk3EBNDr9ql-jZZIx0CEA
🤮13
Credo che esista una correlazione tra chi si mette in fila per un krapfen (mentre si trova immerso nello spettacolo della natura) e chi si metteva in fila per il vaccino Covid.
💯29😱5💅2🤯1
In questa intervista al Corriere, Selvaggia Lucarelli afferma che 1️⃣ la recensione con firma farlocca del libro di Ranucci le sia stata girata “da suoi colleghi di Report” 2️⃣ a proposito dei rapporti sopra le righe di Ranucci con le colleghe, raccontati nel suo libro e poi giustificati dallo stesso come romanzati: “Una mia amica ha lavorato con lui ed è testimone diretta di una gestione poco professionale dei rap…
🤮14😁6❤1🥴1
In un messaggio inviato il 7 luglio scorso, Lavitola scrive a Stefano Cappellini, direttore di Repubblica “Spero molto che l’aver intrattenuto rapporti con me non ti venga a pregiudicare, anche se dato il tuo spessore mi sembrerebbe difficile, a meno che non decidessi di chiedermi di fare un attentato anche a te”
🤣24🔥2😇1
Se il colore della pelle non deve essere stigmatizzato in merito ai reati, perché i giornali dem incensano quasi esclusivamente le medaglie vinte da atleti con genitori di origini straniere o naturalizzati?
🖕32💩11🍌5👍4🤯1
Jason Arday è stato trovato senza vita in un appartamento a sud di Londra. Decantato come il più giovane professore nero di Cambridge, si era recentemente dimesso in seguito alle accuse di plagio.
🤣22🤷♀11🌚5🍌5🍾4🤔2😎2
Jean-Luc Mélenchon, leader del partito francese di estrema sinistra La France Insoumise “Se contate sui lavoratori bianchi cristiani per instaurare il socialismo in Francia, non accadrà. Ma con i nostri fratelli e sorelle musulmani sì” https://x.com/fratotolo2/status/2088500355994734704?s=46&t=sUk3EBNDr9ql-jZZIx0CEA
🖕30🤣14🔥6💊4🤡4🤮2🥴2🤯1
Quando il Pd era al governo, la stessa Alessia Morani consigliava agli anziani, che non riuscivano ad arrivare a fine mese, di ipotecare la casa.
💩73🤡31🔥11🖕8😡3⚡1
Chi mi accusava falsamente di utilizzare “account marionetta” per rendere virali i miei post, recensiva con 5 stelle e un commento entusiasta il suo libro su Amazon firmandosi con uno nome fasullo.
💩57🤡33🤣15🙈11💊3😡2❤1🍌1
“Limitare la libertà di stampa” diceva Ranucci
🤣51💩35🤡17💊4😡1
“Dall'esame dei messaggi scambiati tra Lavitola e la persona offesa, si evince come gli sfoghi di Ranucci in merito alle sue difficoltà lavorative cessino dopo l'esecuzione dell'azione delittuosa nei suoi confronti. E lo stesso Ranucci condivide con soddisfazione con l'amico sondaggi e commenti che dimostrano il momento di rilevante popolarità che sta vivendo” Dopo un attentato dinamitardo che aveva colpito anche la…
🤡57💩23🔥14🤣4❤1💊1😡1
Oggi, Ranucci ha già trasformato l’acqua in vino?
😁65🤡23🤣16🏆4
Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @fratotolo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 71,257 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Francesca Totolo (Unico canale)” (@fratotolo), 9,540 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fratotolo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.