Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 41 days, net +137. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,932–11,133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:16
11,092
-9
15 Sept 2026, 13:37
11,101
-9
14 Sept 2026, 00:38
11,110
+2
12 Sept 2026, 08:58
11,108
+7
10 Sept 2026, 04:15
11,101
+1
4 Sept 2026, 05:20
11,100
+2
2 Sept 2026, 18:04
11,098
-4
1 Sept 2026, 17:35
11,102
+3
31 Aug 2026, 17:45
11,099
+1
30 Aug 2026, 14:47
11,098
+5
29 Aug 2026, 17:39
11,093
+19
28 Aug 2026, 14:16
11,074
+14
27 Aug 2026, 17:11
11,060
+9
26 Aug 2026, 17:09
11,051
+10
25 Aug 2026, 17:32
11,041
+17
24 Aug 2026, 19:36
11,024
+5
23 Aug 2026, 04:06
11,019
+21
21 Aug 2026, 15:35
10,998
+7
20 Aug 2026, 12:33
10,991
+6
19 Aug 2026, 09:34
10,985
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 11,092 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
96 (30 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
21,605
Reactions total
493
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38m 38s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,075 reactions across 92 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
1,214
39.5%
👍
677
22.0%
❤
424
13.8%
😁
340
11.1%
🔥
164
5.33%
💯
78
2.54%
🏆
39
1.27%
⚡
29
0.943%
😈
28
0.911%
💊
23
0.748%
🙈
14
0.455%
🤩
10
0.325%
👎
4
0.13%
😎
4
0.13%
🥰
4
0.13%
🍾
3
0.098%
👌
3
0.098%
😭
3
0.098%
😱
3
0.098%
🎃
2
0.065%
7 further kinds
9
0.293%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,075 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I giovani non correvano alcun rischio con la Covid, ed il va$$ino come scritto in scheda tecnica, non fermava la trasmissione, quindi non c’era nessuna ragione per rischiare le loro vite, ma nonostante gli avvertimenti della scienza seria, proseguirono nel loro intento di finire le scorte.
https://t.me/matteoilfarmacistalibero/5776
E fu così che crearono, oltre i turbo tumori, una nuova patologia la trombosi e trom…
Domanda da porre al Cts.
A sto giro vi consiglio l’autoreplicante, cosicché non esisteranno più corpi per poterlo replicare.
https://t.me/matteoilfarmacistalibero/6051
Mi percepisco scienziato, perché quando vi penso mi sento più intelligente.
Un anno fa
Ma da gente che non ti ha saputo curare per una patologia simil influenzale come la Covid,
https://t.me/matteoilfarmacistalibero/7347
vi potevate aspettare che potessero salvare una bimba da una patologia potenzialmente letale come la difterite?!?
E poi perché devi costringere il tuo prossimo a farsi inoculare con l’obbligo di Stato,
quando tu sei più che protetto perché ti hanno più volte inoculato?
https://t.me/matteoilfarmacistalibero/7374
Clicca qui se non sei un nazisanitario, offerta ancora valida per pochi.
Ed ogni mattina quando ci specchiamo la coscienza ci sorride e l’anima ci abbraccia.
Sempre e per sempre in alto i nostri gloriosi cuori Amici per sempre Liberi!
https://t.me/matteoilfarmacistalibero
2 anni fa
Quando le scemenze che postavi 2 anni fa calzano sempre a pennello, perché le menzogne sono sempre le stesse.
Un nazipass a vita, per essere sicuri di essere tra gente che non ha capito ancora nulla dopo 4 anni, a chi indovina chi è il paziente zero in questa nuova e assurda emergenza.
Sono curioso di sapere che faccia ha chi molesta una scimmia.
https://t.me/matteoilfarmacistalibero
2 anni fa
Segue
3 OTTOBRE 2024
La polizia si presenta a casa di Bassetti perché i vicini si lamentano della musica troppo alta durante una festa.
La sua reazione stizzita: «Deboli con i forti e forti con i deboli».
Proprio lui che non perde occasione di discrimine ed insultare come novax, chi vorrebbe esercitare il diritto alla libera scelta.
30 DICEMBRE 2024
«Il 2025 rischia di essere l’anno dell’aviaria».
Ce la ricordia…
Dal virus pericoloso come l’influenza alle punture che fermavano i contagi.
Breve stupidiario di Matteo Bassetti,
in ordine puramente cronologico.
26 FEBBRAIO 2020
«Dobbiamo essere tranquillizzanti, come sono stato fin dall’inizio. Il coronavirus è più simile all’influenza che alla peste bubbonica.
Ad oggi in Italia veramente morto per il coronavirus non c’è nessuno.
È una bruttissima forma virale ma molto più vi…
Se sei un provax,
e se dopo 10 anni non hai fatto il richiamo per la difterite.
Sei un novax.
Se poi pure muori,
sei un ritardovax.
https://t.me/matteoilfarmacistalibero/7374
Attenzione:
non è un incitamento a correre a farsi il vaccino.
👏23😁14🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @matteoilfarmacistalibero. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@matteoilfarmacistalibero edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎 @dottgabrieleprinzi_official · 29,473 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Cristina Tomasi @drcristinatomasi · 28,289 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
Canale Comitato Fortitudo @comitatofortitudo · 52,492 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Protocolli CDS @protocolliCDS · 42,240 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Matteo Il Farmacista Libero” (@matteoilfarmacistalibero), 11,092 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matteoilfarmacistalibero.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
