Channel
@nova_civitas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
8,986subscribers
+98 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002360519111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nova_civitas |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nova_civitas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 8,986 | +30 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 8,956 | +21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 8,935 | +45 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 8,890 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 8,888 | first reading |
182 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 167 of 177 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 182 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 168,064 |
| Reactions total | 4,259 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,932 reactions across 146 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 818 | 20.8% | |
| 🤬 | 708 | 18.0% | |
| ❤ | 437 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 405 | 10.3% | |
| 👏 | 372 | 9.46% | |
| 🤮 | 289 | 7.35% | |
| 😈 | 185 | 4.70% | |
| 💩 | 183 | 4.65% | |
| 🤡 | 80 | 2.03% | |
| 🙏 | 78 | 1.98% | |
| 😡 | 60 | 1.53% | |
| 👎 | 46 | 1.17% | |
| 😭 | 44 | 1.12% | |
| 🖕 | 41 | 1.04% | |
| 😱 | 38 | 0.966% | |
| 🤩 | 22 | 0.56% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 0.483% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 0.483% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 0.458% | |
| 🙈 | 15 | 0.381% | |
| 10 further kinds | 55 | 1.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 182 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,259reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
L’ Integrazione IA e biotech preoccupa e non poco. La Fondazione Gates, sempre lui, finanzia la prima creazione in assoluto di 16 virus sintetici tramite l'IA. Alcuni ricercatori hanno utilizzato modelli di IA per progettare interi genomi virali, sintetizzarli fisicamente e trasformarli in 16 nuovi virus funzionali e capaci di replicarsi. Il responsabile del progetto, Brian Hie – che ha ideato, progettato e superv…
Signed Leonardo Guerra
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.12.675911v1.full.pdf
Signed Leonardo Guerra
Stralcio dal Libro: "Palantir, le pietre veggenti di Trump". La piramide del potere La piramide del potere, oscuro, basa la sua stabilità e la sua forza principalmente sul “popolo degli incerti”, che è prevalente. Un’armata che reagisce compatta agli stimoli inviati e che viene utilizzata per fabbricare il consenso necessario nell’opinione pubblica a sostegno dei loro piani e progetti di sfruttamento. Al bisogno di…
👍10
Signed Leonardo Guerra
Photo, posted without a caption
👏4
Signed Leonardo Guerra
“Attenzione alle farine industriali... Non fidatevi... Ovvero attenzione ad ogni prodotto a base di farine industriali... Biscotti, pane, dolci ... anche cosiddetti "artigianali"... A base di preparati... Non lasciarti ammazzare dalla chimica e dalle muffe e cacca, pipì di insetti e topi... Scegli prodotti freschi da cereali antichi biologici, direttamente dagli agricoltori o da piccoli mulini locali. Difendi la tua …
Signed Leonardo Guerra
L'immigrazione illegale cesserà solo quando i governi prenderanno le distanze da Israele, che la alimenta e sostiene fin dall’inizio vs l’Europa. Prima la gente lo capirà e si ribellerà, prima finirà l'arrivo di barche e gommoni. La nostra "Destra" è strutturalmente incapace di fermare gli sbarchi perché la volontà di Israele conta più della sovranità nazionale e della salute dei propri cittadini. Proprio per ques…
👍23🤬6
Signed Leonardo Guerra
"Le iniezioni anti-COVID sono state più pericolose del COVID." Il dottor Charles Hoffe canadese, afferma che i danni da vaccino anti-COVID sono diventati le "vere vittime" dopo l'avvio della campagna vaccinale, sostenendo che le autorità non abbiano affrontato adeguatamente le segnalazioni di cittadini canadesi che riferiscono di aver subito danni. Hanno seguito lo schema Draghi, con AIFA e Magrini che nascondevano…
👍12😡9❤2
Signed Leonardo Guerra
Il livello di manipolazione mentale attuato dai Governi Conte e Draghi è ben peggio di quello del nazismo, che al confronto sembrano un branco di scolaretti, principianti.
🤬29🤣7🔥5
Signed Leonardo Guerra
Il regime Draghi ha detto letteralmente ai "non vaccinati" che sarebbero morti... e, a distanza di qualche anno, si scopre che sono i "vaccinati" a morire di infarto, cancro, malattie autoimmuni e patologie correlate all'HIV... Draghi, con Speranza, la classe politica e quella medica, ha guidato l’attuazione di un genocidio programmato e camuffato da pandemia dell’agenda WEF. Due le armi biologiche. La prima il vi…
🤮23😈14👍6
Signed Leonardo Guerra
Lavorano e si infiltrano costantemente per manipolare la mente e la percezione delle masse per ingannarle e sottometterle, con il loro contributo volontario. Il primo bersaglio è il cristianesimo, il Vaticano e il Papa. E riescono a corrompere “le istituzioni” costantemente. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/jewish-scholar-elected-to-lead-catholic-biblical-association/?utm_source=SOCIAL
🙏8👍6❤3
Signed Leonardo Guerra
👆Empatia suicida in Rhodesia. Ecco Judith Todd. Ebbe la fortuna di nascere in uno dei paesi più ricchi e sicuri dell'epoca, ma scelse di fare della sua distruzione la missione della propria vita. Sosteneva la distruzione della Rhodesia e l'instaurazione del governo della maggioranza nera, sostenendo che ciò avrebbe portato prosperità e democrazia. Durante i conflitti di guerriglia (le cosiddette "Bush Wars"), simpa…
❤15👏9
Signed Leonardo Guerra
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Leonardo Guerra
Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @nova_civitas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@nova_civitas edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 23,118 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEONARDO GUERRA” (@nova_civitas), 8,986 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nova_civitas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.