Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Giorgio Bianchi Photojournalist

@giorgiobianchiphotojournalist

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116,302subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374961501
TypeChannel
Username@giorgiobianchiphotojournalist
DescriptionNotizie e analisi sull'attualità e la geopolitica.
Created4 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/giorgiobianchiphotojournalist

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@giorgiobianchiphotojournalist/48044 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC@davidetutino/43975 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC1.0015 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@davidetutino6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 hoursthis entry (60)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 33 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @giorgiobianchiphotojournalist — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

116,302116,406116,3546 August 2026 — 116,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 116,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 116,398 subscribers7 August 2026 — 116,383 subscribers8 August 2026 — 116,377 subscribers9 August 2026 — 116,363 subscribers10 August 2026 — 116,348 subscribers11 August 2026 — 116,320 subscribers12 August 2026 — 116,302 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116,286–116,422 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:54116,302-18
11 Aug 2026, 14:45116,320-28
10 Aug 2026, 14:31116,348-15
9 Aug 2026, 14:13116,363-14
8 Aug 2026, 13:55116,377-6
7 Aug 2026, 15:10116,383-15
6 Aug 2026, 12:21116,398-8
6 Aug 2026, 08:30116,406no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:21116,406first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.54%
avg views ÷ 116,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,100
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
82
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held82 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total899,010
Reactions total23,258
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
20,300
Videos
6,790
Links
26,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 08s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20,158 reactions across 70 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎8,31341.2%
👍8,22540.8%
3,62018.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,258reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈3,470 views137 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @inside_overPhoto

Il Venezuela e Israele hanno ristabilito i servizi diplomatici interrotti 17 anni fa. Nel 2009 il governo venezuelano di Hugo Chávez interruppe i rapporti con lo Stato ebraico dopo l'operazione “Piombo Fuso” a Gaza. L'annuncio, fatto martedì 11 agosto congiuntamente da Israele e il Venezuela, giunge mentre la presidente ad interim Delcy Rodríguez sta portando avanti un importante riallineamento politico dopo il ra

👎136👍1

12 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,090 views131 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BravagliosWarRoomPhoto

Il Nostradamus dei Parioli, esperto nella divinazione coi fondi del mojito.

👎126👍41

12 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,810 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vn_rangeloniPhoto

Putin avverte l'Occidente: "risponderemo con la stessa moneta a qualsiasi tentativo di sequestrare le nostre navi" "Constatiamo che le autorità di alcuni Paesi, in violazione del diritto marittimo internazionale, stanno tentando di limitare la navigazione di navi civili appartenenti ai nostri operatori economici. Recentemente hanno persino concepito l'idea di sequestrare le nostre navi vendendo i carichi che ci hann

👍8223👎1

12 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈3,020 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @LauraRuHK

È stata dichiarata la caccia alla flotta ombra dell'Occidente? Oggi, a bordo dell'incrociatore missilistico "Varyag", Vladimir Putin ha formulato quella che probabilmente è la reazione più forte di Mosca alla pirateria occidentale contro la cosiddetta flotta ombra russa. ▪️ Se i paesi dell'Unione Europea passeranno dalle ispezioni e dai fermi delle navi alla loro confisca e alla vendita del carico, Mosca intende risp

69👍25👎5

12 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈3,140 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @LauraRuHK

La campagna ucraina di attacchi con droni contro i depositi del principale rivenditore online (Wildberries) in varie regioni della Russia, è stata finora un boomerang. Per ogni colpo inferto, Mosca ha risposto con una rappresaglia di portata ben superiore, colpendo il cuore logistico della regione di Kiev, a partire dal complesso Rozetka a Brovary, e mettendo in ginocchio le catene di approvvigionamento ucraine. Il r

54👍41👎1

12 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈7,760 views181 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vn_rangeloniPhoto

🇬🇧 La Gran Bretagna desidera ripristinare i contatti militari di alto livello con la Russia Secondo quanto riportato dal quotidiano britannico Times, i vertici militari britannici temono il rischio di un'“escalation involontaria” a causa della mancanza di dialogo. La necessità di riprendere il dialogo è emersa in seguito all’apertura del fuoco d’avvertimento da parte dalla fregata russa “Admiral Grigorovich” nel Ca

👎128👍3518

11 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC≈11,000 views159 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Prima ancora delle oltre 70 mila persone che hanno attraversato il valico di Bab Sebta per raggiungere Ceuta, dei quasi 100 migranti morti in mare, dei minori rimasti nell'enclave e della rottura diplomatica tra Roma e Madrid, c’è stato un video virale. Poi gruppi WhatsApp, post su TikTok e Facebook, messaggi in cui si promettevano frontiere aperte, propagati da reti di traffico di esseri umani che usano i social com

👍11736👎6

11 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC≈11,400 views281 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @inside_overVideo

La protezione civile palestinese ha recuperato diciannove corpi, per lo più donne e bambini, dalle macerie di un edificio residenziale distrutto a Gaza City. Le squadre della protezione civile continuano a scavare tra le macerie e a identificare i resti con mezzi rudimentali, mentre l'ingresso nella Striscia di macchinari pesanti e attrezzature specializzate per recuperare i corpi resta fortemente limitato da Israel

👎18397👍1

11 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC≈9,020 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rossobruni

L’UE COORDINA I FACT-CHECKER CON META E TIKTOK PER EVITARE UN’ALTRA CRISI DI CEUTA ALIMENTATA ONLINE Fonte: euronews 🟥 SOSTIENI GIUBBE ROSSE Telegram | Portale | Substack | X | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube

👍89👎1210

11 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC≈8,850 views265 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rossobruniPhoto

REZAEI: "HORMUZ NON VERRÀ RIAPERTO FINO A QUANDO GLI USA NON ACCETTERANNO LE CONDIZIONI DELL'IRAN" Fonte: Tasnim, via MenchOsint Dichiarazione di Mohsen Rezaei, Segretario del Supremo Consiglio di Sicurezza Nazionale dell'Iran, in un incontro con l'Ambasciatore cinese: "Lo Stretto di Hormuz non verrà riaperto fino a quando gli Stati Uniti non cambieranno il loro comportamento e accetteranno le condizioni dell'Iran.

👍22736👎2

11 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC≈10,300 views260 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo courtesy of "Zavorrina Orobica". Domani Trentino. 🔴 Per ricevere tutti gli aggiornamenti segui Giorgio Bianchi Photojournalist

👍19158👎11

11 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈10,400 views279 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ComitatoDonbassVideo

🇮🇹🤡🇺🇦 QUANDO PARSI DICEVA CHE I PATRIOT FUNZIONAVANO BENE MENTRE I MISSILI IPERSONICI RUSSI ERANO "BULGARI" (DI BASSA QUALITÀ) Questo è il cialtrone che insulta Travaglio e il Fatto Quotidiano. VEDI ANCHE ▪️"Chi era in grado di farlo? Chi aveva le possibilità tecniche per un simile atto di sabotaggio [del Nord Stream]? Il numero dei possibili sospetti si riduce moltissimo... principalmente la Russia" ▪️"Noi siamo in

👍226👎3419

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @giorgiobianchiphotojournalist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,688 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Giorgio Bianchi Photojournalist” (@giorgiobianchiphotojournalist), 116,302 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giorgiobianchiphotojournalist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.