IN LOOP 🌺🌺🌺 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
🤣19🤮3❤2👍1🔥1

Channel
@MarCosent
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,554subscribers
-119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001516567901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MarCosent |
| Description | Che perder tempo a chi più sa, più spiace. |
| Created | 9 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MarCosent |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 13,554 | -3 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 03:40 | 13,557 | -4 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:38 | 13,561 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:47 | 13,565 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:54 | 13,568 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:27 | 13,573 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:45 | 13,575 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:36 | 13,574 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:29 | 13,577 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 13,585 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 13,588 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 13,590 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 13,592 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 13,596 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 13,595 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 13,596 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 13,602 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:50 | 13,609 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 13,612 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:28 | 13,613 | first reading |
89 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 89 (22 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 86,652 |
| Reactions total | 1,257 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 07:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,987 reactions across 87 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,321 | 33.1% | |
| ❤ | 1,051 | 26.4% | |
| 👏 | 612 | 15.3% | |
| 🤬 | 329 | 8.25% | |
| 🤣 | 202 | 5.07% | |
| 🤮 | 119 | 2.98% | |
| 😢 | 112 | 2.81% | |
| 😁 | 59 | 1.48% | |
| 👌 | 51 | 1.28% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 1.18% | |
| 🤯 | 17 | 0.426% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 0.401% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 0.351% | |
| 😐 | 10 | 0.251% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 0.201% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.125% | |
| 🎅 | 4 | 0.1% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 0.1% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,047 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (10.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
IN LOOP 🌺🌺🌺 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
🤣19🤮3❤2👍1🔥1
TRE DONNE INTORNO AL COR 🌺🌺🌺 "mi son venute", raccontava il Sommo Poeta. Io molto più umilmente mi son trovato sotto i post di stamani tre commentatori provax, tutti alquanto aggressivi e livorosi. Stasera ho cliccato sui loro profili social scoprendo così che due hanno bandiere ucraine e israeliane come sfondi e uno è interista. A dire che talora si intravedono frammenti di coerenza logica nel caos.
🤣50👏9❤2👍1
LA RETE CHE PROTEGGE 🌺🌺🌺 In Lombardia il sistema di farmacovigilanza si autocelebra con un convegno così intitolato, giustificato più che altro dall'avvio dell'ennesimo corso di laurea in farmacia. https://www.luinonotizie.it/2026/11/09/farmacovigilanza-ats-insubria-protagonista-in-lombardia/588662 La regione in realtà avrebbe margini di miglioramento enormi anche sul fronte delle segnalazioni di sospette reazioni av…
❤10👍8👏4
I VACCINI E L'INFERNO 🌺🌺🌺 Tra i vari commenti lasciati dai passanti sotto questo post, ne trovo stamane uno che suona così: "E invece i vaccini ci hanno tirato fuori da quell'inferno!", il che mi offre lo spunto per una replica, cosa che i tanti altri commenti aggressivi e livorosi non consentivano. Ecco, riguardo a questo commento potrei addirittura dirmi d'accordo, se per inferno intendiamo la sospensione della vit…
👏50❤6👍4🤔2🤣2🙏1
E INVECE... 🌺🌺🌺 Confesso che avevo in gran parte scordato questa mia audizione al Senato del dicembre 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwKKEwRlYKQ nella quale in estrema sintesi spiegavo come i vaccini covid oltre a essere pericolosi sono tra i migliori mezzi di diffusione del contagio, specie se associati al Green Pass. Confesso anche che già allora la questione mi pareva talmente chiara che non mi capacitavo d…
❤58👍36
ACCATTONE 🌺🌺🌺 Sulla navetta per l'aeroporto, una stazione radio informa che in varie città italiane è attiva una "biblioteca delle cose", per evitare di acquistare cose che non servono e condividerle invece con altri. Ora, una biblioteca - lo dice il nome stesso - si occupa di libri. Ma fin qui potrebbe essere una licenza forse dovuta a poca attenzione per gli etimi. Quel che tuttavia mi pare più triste è che costoro…
👏41👍8❤6😢2👎1🥰1
TECNOSCIENZA COME FEDE 🌺🌺🌺 Il 28 novembre 2026 a Venezia il 3° Festival della Scienza dell'Associazione ContiamoCi! https://t.me/associazione_ContiamoCi/1739
❤15👍4👌2
FREEZER BOLLENTI 🌺🌺🌺 Alzi la mano chi si ricorda del 75enne ravennate morto nella notte tra il 16 e il 17 maggio 2023, durante la drammatica alluvione che colpì l'Emilia-Romagna. L'acqua inondò la sua villetta ipertecnologica e, a causa del blackout elettrico provocato dal maltempo, i sistemi domotici, le tapparelle elettriche e le porte blindate/motorizzate si bloccarono, le inferriate anti-intrusione resero impossi…
👍33👏12❤3😢2😱1
SOSTITUZIONE TOPONOMASTICA 🌺🌺🌺 https://www.laprovinciadivarese.it/via-padre-giuliani-cancellata-per-gino-strada-la-cancel-culture-arriva-a-varese-413140/
🤮16❤2👍1🤣1
LE RELAZIONI PERICOLOSE 🌺🌺🌺 Ieri avevo messo da parte il post più recente di Sensibile Medicine per commentarlo appena possibile. Il post ragiona su un recente studio pubblicato sul Journal of Clinical Oncology che mostra come bastino 45 dollari per influenzare le prescrizioni mediche di trattamenti anticancro. https://www.theoncologyshot.com/p/currency-of-influence-in-oncology Indipendentemente dal fatto che siano i…
❤19👌6👍1
ONLAIN 🌺🌺🌺 L'università chiede ai docenti di videoregistrare le lezioni e renderle disponibili in rete, e poi contesta ai medesimi docenti il riutilizzo delle videoregistrazioni l'anno successivo. Facessero pace con se stessi e con il loro ragionamento, e considerassero se mai che la richiesta di predisporre materiali online è aggiuntiva rispetto ai compiti ordinari del docente, e come tale non può essere che volonta…
👍22👏11❤8
OLESHKY 🌺🌺🌺 Lo sciopero della fame è durato poco. https://t.me/giorgiobianchiphotojournalist/49227
👍12❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @MarCosent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@MarCosent edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marco Cosentino” (@MarCosent), 13,554 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarCosent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.