Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Comilva

Channel

Comilva

@comilva

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,597subscribers

+380 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001496131977
TypeChannel
Username@comilva
Created5 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/comilva

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

17,21717,59717,4076 August 2026 — 17,217 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,219 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,218 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,219 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,225 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,223 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,217 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,220 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,218 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,220 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,229 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,238 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,349 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,420 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,451 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,475 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,490 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,502 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,506 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,516 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,523 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,525 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,530 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,541 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,551 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,556 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,559 subscribers25 September 2026 — 17,597 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 50 days, net +380. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,160–17,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 15:1917,597+38
15 Sept 2026, 09:5617,559+3
13 Sept 2026, 16:1917,556+5
11 Sept 2026, 22:2117,551+10
9 Sept 2026, 09:3817,541+11
5 Sept 2026, 22:3917,530+5
3 Sept 2026, 20:2217,525+2
2 Sept 2026, 09:4417,523+7
1 Sept 2026, 07:5817,516+10
31 Aug 2026, 06:2517,506+4
30 Aug 2026, 08:3617,502+12
29 Aug 2026, 06:1317,490+15
28 Aug 2026, 05:2817,475+24
27 Aug 2026, 03:2217,451+31
26 Aug 2026, 00:0217,420+71
24 Aug 2026, 20:2917,349+111
23 Aug 2026, 05:0317,238+9
21 Aug 2026, 14:3517,229+9
20 Aug 2026, 13:3317,220+2
19 Aug 2026, 15:5117,218first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.58%
avg views ÷ 17,597 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,510
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held28 (25 May 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total1,510
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 3 September 2026

🎙Intervista a 9MQ, oggi Oggi a 9MQ, insieme all'Avv. Francesco Paolo Cinquemani, abbiamo parlato di Legge Lorenzin e delle conseguenze a livello di applicazione fantasiosa della norma dopo il tragico caso della bambina deceduta in Sicilia: informazioni utili per difendersi dagli abusi e dall'ignoranza giuridica delle nostre istituzioni. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19aJ1EKu2k/ https://www.youtube.com/live/Vv3xF…

27 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC≈5,160 viewsread 3 September 2026

Quando la vergogna supera ogni limite, partorisce mostri L’articolo del dott. Eugenio Serravalle mette a nudo, senza lasciare spazio a equivoci, l’indegna campagna costruita sulla morte della bambina di Palermo e sulla sua famiglia: una macchina del fango feroce, ancora oggi in piena attività. Quando si fabbricano menzogne, si seminano insinuazioni interessate e si servono risposte preconfezionate; quando il rispett…

24 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈21,300 viewsread 3 September 2026

Messaggio da COMILVA alle Famiglie che ci seguono Data la recente strumentalizzazione sulla dolorosa vicenda di Palermo, desideriamo ricordarvi che l’Obiezione Attiva non finisce con l’iscrizione a scuola e che non si tratta di un mero "escamotage", come riportato in alcune cronache strumentali a stigmatizzare il comportamento dei genitori obiettori. L'Obiezione è e rimane un percorso di responsabilità genitoriale …

23 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC≈6,210 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://t.me/MarCosent/5122 Rilanciamo la corposa riflessione di Pietro Di Martino presentata magistralmente dal dott. Marco Cosentino La criminalizzazione dei genitori “no-vax” contrapposta all’assoluzione per “manifesta ignoranza” nella capacità diagnostica e nella tempestività dell’intervento terapeutico dei sanitari coinvolti nella vicenda descrive in modo chiarissimo il doppiopesismo con il quale viene present…

23 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈6,400 viewsread 3 September 2026

Condividiamo questa lucida lettura sulla tragica vicenda di Palermo a firma dell'Avv. Cinquemani, che mette in luce la strumentalizzazione politica e l'asimmetria mediatica nel trattare i decessi cagionati dalle vaccinazioni. Uno show mediatico che è ora di smascherare per ciò che è. Quotidiano Sociale: Palermo, la morte della bambina di quattro anni: quando il rumore mediatico copre la verità clinica e distoglie lo…

23 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC≈6,260 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Immagine da "La Verità" del 22 agosto 2026 Rispetto e Verità Il caso della bambina morta a Palermo nei giorni scorsi per una “sospetta difterite” è stato immediatamente trasformato in un’occasione di spettacolarizzazione mediatica. Prima ancora che il quadro fosse chiarito, social e mass media hanno alimentato una narrazione aggressiva, povera di prudenza e di rispetto, in cui il dolore di una famiglia è diventato …

22 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈3,610 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @assis_salute_informazionePhoto

A Palermo è morta una bambina di quattro anni. Tra le ipotesi diagnostiche è stata indicata la difterite, ma gli accertamenti non sono ancora conclusi. La difterite respiratoria classica è oggi eccezionalmente rara in Italia. Proprio questa rarità pone domande cliniche e organizzative concrete: Quando è stata sospettata? È stata richiesta l’antitossina difterica DAT? Dove era disponibile e quanto tempo sarebbe serv…

9 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC≈5,650 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @avvcinquemani

Quotidiano Sociale: Pandemia sotto esame: il dossier del Congresso e il silenzio di Fauci che fa tremare la scienza politicizzata in America e in Europa: https://share.google/L7YHuktIJD6MquLnj A cura di: Avv. Francesco Paolo Cinquemani Canale Telegram: https://t.me/avvcinquemani

4 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈10,100 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

​🚨 IL BASSETTI RAMPANTE E IL MISTERO DELLA "NOMINA" 🚨 ​Matteo Bassetti scelto dal Ministro Schillaci per il Comitato ministeriale del Piano Pandemico 2025-2029? Falso! ​Una "fake news" durata lo spazio di un weekend, condita da pagine web improvvisamente cancellate e imbarazzanti "auto-nomine". La realtà? Il Prof. dovrà accontentarsi di un ruolo burocratico per la sola Regione Liguria. ​Ma al di là dell'ironia su …

1 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC≈24,800 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

CAMPAGNA INFORMATIVA SULLE CARENZE DELLA FARMACOVIGILANZA I consiglieri regionali della VdA Manfrin, Zucchi e Domanico prendono una posizione netta, insieme al movimento Valle d’Aosta Futura e alle numerose famiglie impegnate a tutelare il diritto di accesso alle comunità infantili per tutti i bambini le cui famiglie hanno presentato la documentazione richiesta dalla legge 119/2017. 📢 Con una campagna informativa c…

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @comilva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

C.Li.Va. Toscana
@clivatoscana · 21,523
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Comilva” (@comilva), 17,597 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comilva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.