Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net +109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,483–23,646 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 07:01
23,611
-16
16 Sept 2026, 19:41
23,627
+3
14 Sept 2026, 19:55
23,624
+5
13 Sept 2026, 04:19
23,619
-2
11 Sept 2026, 04:16
23,621
+9
8 Sept 2026, 09:38
23,612
-5
5 Sept 2026, 07:56
23,617
+1
3 Sept 2026, 08:15
23,616
-4
2 Sept 2026, 05:28
23,620
+4
1 Sept 2026, 03:17
23,616
+1
31 Aug 2026, 02:34
23,615
+6
28 Aug 2026, 23:25
23,609
+7
27 Aug 2026, 23:26
23,602
-3
27 Aug 2026, 01:56
23,605
+6
26 Aug 2026, 03:12
23,599
+7
24 Aug 2026, 23:43
23,592
-4
23 Aug 2026, 10:18
23,596
+1
22 Aug 2026, 00:27
23,595
+10
20 Aug 2026, 16:22
23,585
+12
19 Aug 2026, 14:11
23,573
first reading
Engagement
584 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 23,611 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,180
172 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
172
of 584 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
584 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
547,157
Reactions total
21,902
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
15m 34s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
63,410 reactions across 584 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
18,116
28.6%
😁
13,641
21.5%
👏
8,486
13.4%
❤
8,305
13.1%
🤬
3,387
5.34%
🔥
2,866
4.52%
💯
2,529
3.99%
😱
2,514
3.96%
🍾
1,323
2.09%
🏆
1,322
2.08%
😢
520
0.82%
🆒
301
0.475%
🥰
62
0.098%
❤🔥
38
0.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 584 of the 584 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63,410 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 584 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 584 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @italiaaustralia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 584 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
È imbarazzante, le donne non possono fare le poliziotte, mettono in pericolo la vita dei colleghi uomini che devono proteggerle.
Il DEI ha creato danni enormi che richiederanno un lungo tempo per essere riparati.
E no, saper fare arti marziali non serve ad un cazzo.
Video fatto in Nord Carolina, anche la globalista RT chiama i negri aggressori un "gruppo di teenager", come farebbe il Corriere o Repubblica.
➡️ Un…
Non so se disprezzo più questo finocchietto di merda o le bestie che lo hanno accoltellato.
➡️ Un nutrizionista italiano in Australia: t.me/italiaaustralia
Abito per 6 mesi all'anno in un piccolo paese dell'Appennino ligure-emiliano e davvero qui trovo un briciolo di umanità.I bar sono una istituzione, sembra davvero che nessuno riesca a rinunciare ad uscire per trovarsi a giocare a carte, a bere un bicchiere insieme o a fare una cantata. Perché qui, sì, molti giovani cantano i canti tradizionali a cappella dopo aver bevuto insieme. I miei figli si danno appuntamento in…
Incredibile, e questo dimostra quanto valgano le mie previsioni visto che ai tempi ho fermamente deciso di NON investire in Tesla: in Australia ad agosto, per la prima volta, le auto elettriche hanno venduto di più delle diesel e delle benzina (benzina e diesel insieme però hanno venduto di più), e la Tesla Model Y è stata l'auto più venduta.
➡️ Un nutrizionista italiano in Australia: t.me/italiaaustralia
Faccio una proposta a Donaldone: manda l'ICE a New York, e fai arrestare ed espellere a pedate nel culo quel comunista di merda di Antonio Guterres.
Se poi provasse a reagire...
Perché è ora di farla finita col climate change, è ora di dire basta, e di dare dei bei ceffoni a chi parla di clima che cambia, caldo estremo o minchiate globaliste del genere.
Io, personalmente, non ne posso più, non ho più tolleranza pe…
Soli.
In Tailandia si possono affittare "amici" un tanto all'ora, per andare a prendere un caffè insieme, a fare due passi o una girata.
Qui a Bali ci sono tantissime ragazzine occidentali sole, sono sole nei cafè, nei ristoranti o sulle spiagge.
In Occidente la solitudine ha raggiunto percentuali terrificanti, ed è una delle insidie più gravi per la qualità della vita e anche la salute.
Tanti australiani si pren…
Disinformazione.
La conseguenza della propaganda globalista, grazie alla loro subdola arte di pervertire la realtà, è che nessuno crede più a nulla, nemmeno all'ovvio o al banale.
Elon Musk testa una flotta di Robotaxi ad Austin? Macchè, dicono tanti, tutto falso, quella tecnologia non esiste.
Cade una slavina di fango in Nepal? Una misteriosa tecnologia americana è stata la causa.
E con queste premesse, quando c…
Ordini.
Sono sempre e soltanto ordini.
Piovono dall'alto, con una giustificazione o un'altra, ma vanno in un'unica direzione: la distruzione della vita.
E, immancabilmente, trovano ligi, fedeli, disciplinati esecutori, che li applicano in una gara di zelante obbedienza ognuno nel proprio specifico ambito di competenza. Magari dietro l'allettante promessa di robusti incentivi economici, che saranno elargiti al ragg…
I carotenoidi, sono molecole molto interessanti, ma quasi nessuno ha una comprensione corretta del loro ruolo nell'alimentazione ideale.
Da una parte ci sono i vegetariani ed adiacenti, che promuovono il trangugiare di enormi quantità di carotenoidi di origine vegetale.
Dall'altra ci sono gli estremisti di senso opposto, che cercano invece di eliminarli completamente dalla dieta.
In realtà, basterebbe seguire la l…
La CNN dà la colpa della slavina di fango in Nepal a Trump.
No, non è una battuta.
Secondo questi servi dei globalisti, il taglio dei fondi di USAID avrebbe impedito a Nepal e Cina di prevenirla.
Come? Boh. Non solo non esiste una tecnologia per farlo, ma soprattutto perché dovrebbe essere a carico degli Stati Uniti?
➡️ Un nutrizionista italiano in Australia: t.me/italiaaustralia
Oggi è la Giornata della Bandiera Nazionale Australiana, che fu usata per la prima volta oggi di 125 anni fa.
➡️ Un nutrizionista italiano in Australia: t.me/italiaaustralia
Madonna e la figlia, bellissime e coraggiose.
➡️ Un nutrizionista italiano in Australia: t.me/italiaaustralia
😱93😁38🔥7🤬6😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 584 posts we hold for @italiaaustralia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@italiaaustralia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Silver Nervuti @silvernervuti · 42,471 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Luogocomune2 @luogocomune2 · 48,815 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Andrea Colombini Official Channel @andreacolombini · 83,122 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Dr. BARBARA BALANZONI (qui doc, video, audio,foto) @drbarbarabalanzoni · 70,059 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Guerrieri per la libertà @guerrieriperlaliberta · 45,681 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
La Verità ci Rende Liberi - Advanced Mind @LaVeritaCiRendeLiberiAdvanced · 68,359 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
Buffonate di Stato @buffonatedistato · 74,585 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Alberto Ferrarini @ALBERTOFERRARINI · 63,958 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
Giubbe Rosse @rossobruni · 71,987 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Raffaella Regoli canale ufficiale @RaffaellaRegoli · 47,265 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Canale Comitato Fortitudo @comitatofortitudo · 52,492 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Franco Fracassi Giornalista Indipendente @Franco_Fracassi · 44,113 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
Gianluigi Paragone @gianluigi_paragone · 46,356 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Matteo Gracis @matteogracis · 144,357 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
Byoblu [3.0] @ByobluOfficial · 85,087 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
100 Giorni da Leoni @centogiornidaleoni · 88,303 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bello, Onesto, emigrato Australia” (@italiaaustralia), 23,611 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/italiaaustralia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
