Non sono graditi Qanon militanti, pro-vax, gente che crede ai 'chip nei vaccini' e ai rettiliani
In questo canale domina il pensiero CRITICO e RAZIONALE, bandito ogni fideismo e culto, di qualsiasi genere
Linea politica - Borghi/Fusaro/Paragone/Rizzo -
Created
12 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 71 comparable posts for this entry, running 18 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,345–8,481 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 20:40
8,361
-7
8 Nov 2026, 09:38
8,368
-7
4 Nov 2026, 21:21
8,375
+1
1 Nov 2026, 23:56
8,374
-4
30 Oct 2026, 02:57
8,378
-3
27 Oct 2026, 08:34
8,381
-2
24 Oct 2026, 10:58
8,383
-8
21 Oct 2026, 01:10
8,391
-4
17 Oct 2026, 20:20
8,395
-4
15 Oct 2026, 04:28
8,399
-9
12 Oct 2026, 07:18
8,408
-14
5 Oct 2026, 20:16
8,422
-14
28 Sept 2026, 18:19
8,436
-12
18 Sept 2026, 21:38
8,448
-12
14 Sept 2026, 22:42
8,460
+2
11 Sept 2026, 04:38
8,458
-7
5 Sept 2026, 23:40
8,465
+3
1 Sept 2026, 16:44
8,462
+7
27 Aug 2026, 00:17
8,455
+1
23 Aug 2026, 22:16
8,454
first reading
Engagement
99 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 8,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
951
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 99 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
99 (18 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
51,357
Reactions total
561
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,440
Videos
≈7,810
Links
≈5,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 09m
Average length
3m 39s
Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,307 reactions across 99 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
390
29.8%
👍
336
25.7%
❤
188
14.4%
🤬
178
13.6%
💩
67
5.13%
🔥
27
2.07%
👎
20
1.53%
💯
17
1.30%
🤮
17
1.30%
🤡
15
1.15%
😢
13
0.995%
⚡
10
0.765%
😁
7
0.536%
🙏
5
0.383%
👌
4
0.306%
🖕
4
0.306%
😭
3
0.23%
🙈
2
0.153%
✍
1
0.077%
💔
1
0.077%
2 further kinds
2
0.153%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 31 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (57.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Forwarded from @giorgiobianchiphotojournalistPhoto
Hacker che bontà
Di Marco Travaglio
Fra attacchi hacker veri, attacchi hacker finti e attacchi hacker per avvisarci di quelli finti o di finte bombe sugli aerei, quindi veri ma non troppo, è consolante sapere che siamo in buone mani. Il ministro Crosetto, che la sa lunga come l’avventore di un bar che commenta i fatti del giorno al terzo bianchetto, dichiara che “quelli specializzati sono normalmente cinesi, iranian…
Hanno un concetto chiamato «l'ordine internazionale basato sulle regole».
Viene invocato costantemente, più spesso quando una nazione non occidentale fa qualcosa che i governi occidentali preferiscono non faccia.
L'ordine internazionale basato sulle regole.
Sembra neutrale. Sembra legge. Sembra il tipo di cosa che qualsiasi persona ragionevole sosterrebbe.
Quello che significa nella pratica:
Le regole sono in gr…
Ammesso che oggi sono crollato del tutto. Ho pianto in modo incontrollabile. Non sono riuscito a tenermi insieme dopo aver visto con i miei stessi occhi quello che ho visto.
Oggi siamo andati a girare un reportage giornalistico all’interno delle tende dei sfollati lungo la riva del mare. Lo giuro, quello che abbiamo visto va oltre ciò che qualsiasi essere umano dovrebbe sopportare.
Ho visto uomini piangere amaramen…
Nel 2020 i filmati provenienienti dalla Cina e le immagini dei camion militari di Bergamo, la benedizione di Bergoglio in mondovisione di una Piazza San Pietro deserta, con la sospensione di ogni conforto religioso, trasmesse dalla televisione pubblica in modo ossessivo a tutte le ore, terrorizzarono gli italiani. Al punto tale da criminalizzare chi camminava da solo nei boschi o in riva al mare. Il 5 Marzo il Min…
Savino Balzano:
Contro Il Fatto Quotidiano e Marco #Travaglio si è scatenata una gigantesca macchina del fango. La cosa incredibile è che a manovrarla sia tutto il resto della cosiddetta informazione: tutti i giornali, tutte le televisioni.
Perché?
Per una ragione semplicissima: Il Fatto Quotidiano mette in imbarazzo chi fa un altro mestiere. Chi viene pagato per fare propaganda in un Paese che somiglia sempre di pi…
Ambra Lombardo:
Gasparri, l’amore stellare e la guerra dei 6 giorni.
Sembra tanto un titolo di scarsa letteratura.
Quella da liquidazione alle bancarelle di paese…
Giulietto Chiesa: le radici naziste della NATO
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FJCndMxNC/
👏7❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @FronteSovranista. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@FronteSovranista edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@FronteSovranista named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@vonderleyen named in 3 posts, 4 November 2026 – 8 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗔 𝗧𝗢𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 @AndreaTosattoOfficial · 23,331 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
RA/Avv. DDr. Renate Holzeisen @renateholzeisen · 33,567 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗢 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗢 @consenso_disinformato · 54,271 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
Buffonate di Stato @buffonatedistato · 73,626 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Visione Tv @visionetv · 40,066 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Giubbe Rosse @rossobruni · 71,339 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Paolo Bellavite @PaoloBellavite · 31,245 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
Eventi Avversi News @evncov · 52,337 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
CORVELVA @corvelva1993 · 37,156 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
IL RISVEGLIO DELLA FENICE @ilrisvegliodellafenice · 22,149 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Rossella Fidanza @RossellaFidanza · 28,842 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
In Telegram Veritas @In_Telegram_Veritas · 33,666 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Raffaella Regoli canale ufficiale @RaffaellaRegoli · 46,931 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Qlobal-Change Italia 🇮🇹 @QlobalChangeItalia · 19,619 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 September 2026
Matteo Brandi - Canale Ufficiale @MatBrandi · 23,262 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
Weltanschauung Italia @weltanschauungitaliaofficial · 23,861 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 September 2026
BECCIOLINI NETWORK Informazione libera @canaleFAHRENHEIT912 · 21,934 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎 @dottgabrieleprinzi_official · 29,432 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Matteo Gracis @matteogracis · 143,799 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
la fionda📕 @lafionda · 20,054 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
Il Vaso di Pandora @IVDPandora · 20,439 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 September 2026
La Voce Libera 🗣️🔈 @la_voce_libera · 26,499 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
DataBase Italia @databaseitalia · 38,870 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Roberto Nuzzo 🇮🇹👮♂️ @robertonuzzocanale · 21,111 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fronte Sovranista (di 🇷🇺KasperCarlo🇵🇸) - canale anti imperialista, anti sionista & pro Pal -” (@FronteSovranista), 8,361 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FronteSovranista.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.