Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 53 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,832–12,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 05:21
12,871
+25
17 Sept 2026, 19:16
12,846
-13
15 Sept 2026, 16:15
12,859
-4
14 Sept 2026, 03:38
12,863
-6
12 Sept 2026, 08:58
12,869
-4
10 Sept 2026, 01:59
12,873
+11
6 Sept 2026, 19:21
12,862
+22
4 Sept 2026, 05:57
12,840
-5
2 Sept 2026, 20:14
12,845
-3
1 Sept 2026, 15:24
12,848
-9
31 Aug 2026, 12:53
12,857
-4
30 Aug 2026, 10:28
12,861
-1
29 Aug 2026, 08:47
12,862
-6
28 Aug 2026, 09:32
12,868
-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:55
12,870
+3
26 Aug 2026, 10:24
12,867
-3
25 Aug 2026, 10:33
12,870
-6
24 Aug 2026, 11:58
12,876
-3
22 Aug 2026, 20:49
12,879
+16
21 Aug 2026, 09:56
12,863
first reading
Engagement
158 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.78%
avg views ÷ 12,871 subscribers
Avg views / post
873
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.979%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 158 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
158 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
11,343
Reactions total
111
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 22:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
43m 45s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,272 reactions across 133 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,468
64.6%
🙏
431
19.0%
🥰
133
5.85%
👍
130
5.72%
😍
76
3.35%
😢
34
1.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 143 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,420 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.tiktok.com/@spiritmoderna/video/7666064393435729184
1 in 8 million.
That’s the chance of winning the lottery.
And yet you still buy a ticket.
1 in 3.7 million.
Those are the odds of being involved in a plane crash.
And yet you still fly. 1 in 4,000.
Those are the odds of having a car crash.
And yet we keep driving.
1 in 400 million trillion are the odds that you’re alive.
And yet here you are, wondering …
https://www.tiktok.com/@spiritmoderna/video/7656799527877283105
One of the most important skills you can develop in life is learning to bounce back quickly.
Not every bad moment deserves to affect the rest of your week.
A conversation that went wrong doesn’t have to ruin your whole day.
A bad day doesn’t mean your life is falling apart.
Missing a workout isn’t a failure.
One bad decision doesn’t undo all the progres…
https://www.tiktok.com/@cute_kaleshi_cat/video/7679103033908808990
Il rimpianto è il desiderio di cambiare il passato.
La paura è il desiderio di controllare il futuro.
La pace è l'arrendersi all'Ora.
~ Jeff Foster ~
🍁
Regret is the desire to change the past.
Fear is the desire to control the future.
Peace is surrendering to the present moment.
~ Jeff Foster ~
https://www.tiktok.com/@netflixisajoke/video/7657574340610854158
Growing up means realising that none of us is easy to get on with – not you, not them, not anyone else.
Everyone has flaws; everyone has days when it’s hard to love them, days when they shut themselves off, days when they need more than they can give, days when they test the patience of those around them. This isn’t a problem; it’s simply being human.
T…
Gratitudine
Qualche anno fa, a Singapore, dopo una cerimonia nuziale, il padre della sposa prese da parte il suo nuovo genero per dargli qualche consiglio su come avere un matrimonio lungo e felice.
«Probabilmente ami molto mia figlia» disse al giovane.
«Certo!» esclamò il giovane.
«E probabilmente pensi che sia la persona più meravigliosa del mondo» continuò il vecchio.
«È perfetta da tutti i punti di vista» tubò i…
https://www.tiktok.com/@vibewspark/video/7243082041581980954
Just imagine if you’d always had a point of reference around you, a lighthouse reminding you where you needed to go.
You could be in the dark, in the storm, you could be completely adrift.
But you knew that, come what may, that lighthouse was there, and you trusted it so much that you built everything around it – the whole village, your whole life – taking …
🥰8😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @meditando. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Aforismi e Citazioni @aforismiecitazioni · 35,547 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
Planet 🌍 @pianetafantastico · 24,484 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 September 2026
🧠💡Accendi La Mente🔌💥 @accendilamente · 41,434 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 August 2026
🎙 AudioBook Italia 🇮🇹 @AudiolibriFreeCopyrite · 28,265 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 September 2026
Awake432Hz C.C. @Awake432hz · 39,307 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
La Verità ci Rende Liberi - Advanced Mind @LaVeritaCiRendeLiberiAdvanced · 68,495 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
Alberto Ferrarini @ALBERTOFERRARINI · 63,958 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎 @dottgabrieleprinzi_official · 29,473 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“meditando” (@meditando), 12,871 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meditando.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.