Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Evolutamente.it

Channel

Evolutamente.it

@evolutamente

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,447subscribers

+840 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001439050519
TypeChannel
Username@evolutamente
DescriptionIl canale Telegram di Evolutamente.it - Angelo Rossiello
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/evolutamente

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6067,4477,026.56 August 2026 — 6,607 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,606 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,615 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,625 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,633 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,656 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,730 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,809 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,901 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,930 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,018 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,054 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,093 subscribers2 October 2026 — 7,212 subscribers9 October 2026 — 7,291 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,308 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,317 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,324 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,338 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,386 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,395 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,409 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,428 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,440 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,447 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net +840. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,480–7,573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 20:267,447+7
7 Nov 2026, 10:457,440+12
4 Nov 2026, 15:357,428+19
1 Nov 2026, 18:107,409+14
29 Oct 2026, 14:067,395+9
26 Oct 2026, 13:307,386+48
23 Oct 2026, 02:597,338+14
19 Oct 2026, 16:277,324+7
16 Oct 2026, 21:117,317+9
14 Oct 2026, 02:557,308+17
9 Oct 2026, 06:567,291+79
2 Oct 2026, 09:387,212+119
16 Sept 2026, 20:207,093+39
13 Sept 2026, 02:387,054+36
9 Sept 2026, 05:547,018+88
3 Sept 2026, 13:016,930+29
31 Aug 2026, 13:536,901+92
28 Aug 2026, 18:246,809+79
25 Aug 2026, 09:236,730+74
22 Aug 2026, 02:266,656first reading

Engagement

253 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.69%
avg views ÷ 7,447 subscribers
Avg views / post
498
139 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
139
of 253 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 122 of 139 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held253 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total69,204
Reactions total834
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈17,000
Videos
≈1,680
Links
≈18,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 58s
Average length
1m 45s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,688 reactions across 215 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏45927.2%
👍44526.4%
❤38722.9%
😁1508.89%
🔥834.92%
🤬513.02%
🙏211.24%
💯110.652%
🎉100.592%
🤝100.592%
🥰90.533%
😡80.474%
✍70.415%
🏆70.415%
🕊60.355%
⚡50.296%
🤨40.237%
🫡40.237%
😨30.178%
❤‍🔥20.118%
5 further kinds60.355%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 218 of the 253 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 253 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 139 posts held from the last 30 days (8.63%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 08:21 UTC438 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026

ULTIMI GIORNI PER AVERE LO SCONTO SUL GEMINI BRAIN. 3000 INVECE DI 4000. SCRIVERE AI NOSTRI CONSULENTI.

🫡1

12 Nov 2026, 08:21 UTC442 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🎯 UN MEDICO MI CHIEDE SE IL NOSTRO CASCO PUÒ AIUTARE UN BAMBINO CON LA SINDROME DI RETT. QUESTA È LA MIA RISPOSTA, INTEGRALE. La domanda è arrivata da un medico, ed è una domanda fatta bene. La pubblico perché la risposta onesta è più utile di qualsiasi vendita, e perché le famiglie hanno il diritto di leggere cosa diciamo quando nessuno sta comprando. D: Esistono basi per usare la fotobiomodulazione transcranica n…

❤3👏3

12 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC361 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🎯 TRE ANNI FA IL LATTATO ERA NEL MIO LIBRO. OGGI È UN GEL. LA MOLECOLA È LA STESSA, IL RACCONTO È CAMBIATO. Nel 2023 usciva MITOCHONDRIAL TRAINING, il mio quarto libro, e dentro c'era una tesi che allora sembrava eretica: il lattato non è un veleno, non è un rifiuto, non è la prova che sei andato "in anaerobiosi". È un carburante, è un segnale, e soprattutto è una cosa che si allena. Oggi Enervit esce con un gel al…

👍1👏1

12 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC301 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🎯 LA DIFFERENZA NON È IN QUELLO CHE DICIAMO. È IN QUELLO CHE CI RIFIUTIAMO DI DIRE. Qualcuno che è passato da qui e poi ha preso un'altra strada ha scelto il metodo opposto al nostro, e non c'è niente di male a dirlo: è un fatto, non un'insinuazione. Il punto non è chi se n'è andato. Il punto è cosa distingue un divulgatore da un santone, e la distinzione non è il tono, non è il carisma e non è nemmeno la competenza…

👏1

12 Nov 2026, 07:59 UTC279 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

I commerciali sono commerciali. Li devo tenere sempre per le briglie...

👏1

12 Nov 2026, 07:58 UTC290 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🎯 "DOPO DODICI GIORNI L'IPERMETROPIA È SPARITA." VE LA SPIEGO, E VI DICO ANCHE PERCHÉ NON NE FACCIAMO UN VANTAGGIO. Ci scrivono due optometristi: una loro cliente usa un nostro dispositivo di fotobiomodulazione più economico PLUTO, dopo dodici giorni avverte un fastidio alla vista, la visitano e trovano che l'ipermetropia di circa una diottria non c'è più. Ci chiedono un confronto, con intelligenza e senza entusiasm…

❤8

12 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC286 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Sono stato costretto a licenziare la "logistic manager" che sono 3 anni che lavora con me per la 17a volta. Poi l'ho riassunta per la 18a...

🥰4😁3

12 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC332 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🎯 "I LED CENTRALI NON FUNZIONANO, PROCEDO COL RITIRO?" NO. QUELLI SONO GLI INFRAROSSI. PER DEFINIZIONE NON SI VEDONO. Oggi mi arriva una segnalazione interna, seria e puntuale: la lampada nuova sembra avere dei LED spenti, quelli al centro. Il che, tecnicamente, è la descrizione di una lampada che funziona. La fisica, in due righe. L'occhio umano vede tra circa 380 e 780 nanometri. L'infrarosso vicino, quello che u…

👍9❤3

11 Nov 2026, 19:23 UTC551 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🎯 IL VACCINO CONTRO L'ACNE. NON È UNA FOLLIA: È LA SOLUZIONE GIUSTA APPLICATA AL PUNTO SBAGLIATO DELLA CATENA. Leggo sul Sole 24 Ore del vaccino terapeutico contro l'acne: Sanofi con un candidato a mRNA contro il fattore CAMP, la tossina che Cutibacterium acnes secerne, in fase 1-2 su circa 800 adulti tra i 18 e i 45 anni con acne moderata-grave. E una startup, Armora Biosciences, che punta alla ialuronidasi, distin…

❤4👍4

11 Nov 2026, 19:13 UTC503 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🎯 NON È INSPIEGABILE. È RAZIONALE. ED È PER QUESTO CHE NON CAMBIA NIENTE. Trent'anni di divulgazione e sempre la stessa scena: le evidenze arrivano, sono clamorose, e la medicina non le contesta nel merito. Continua a difendersi. L'ammissione non costa una frase, costa una catena: linea guida, protocollo, cattedra, finanziamento, carriera. E c'è un vincolo che nessuno nomina: le linee guida definiscono la responsab…

❤2🔥2

11 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC457 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🎯 NEGLI STATI UNITI SI DISCUTE DI QUANTO DEVONO DURARE LE PUBBLICITÀ DEI FARMACI. IN ITALIA IL PROBLEMA È UN ALTRO, ED È PEGGIORE. Gira in queste ore la notizia di un provvedimento americano che obbligherebbe le aziende farmaceutiche a elencare tutti gli effetti collaterali, trasformando gli spot pubblicitari in film da quattro minuti. Prendiamola per quello che è, una notizia da verificare. Ma il punto interessante…

👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 253 posts we hold for @evolutamente. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@evolutamente edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr. Cristina Tomasi
@drcristinatomasi · 28,077
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎
@dottgabrieleprinzi_official · 29,432
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Evolutamente.it” (@evolutamente), 7,447 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evolutamente.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.