Channel
@rahkar_com
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,208subscribers
+1,196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001541458360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rahkar_com |
| Description | 🔴 اینجا یاد میگیری اعتمادبنفس و فنبیانت رو خیلی سریع رشد بدی طاها بامشاد | مدرس مهارتهای ارتباطی، فنبیان و سخنرانی 🌐 ارتباط مستقیم با من @taha_bamshad ♦️اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/rahkar.me ♦️سایت مجموعه: www.rahkar.me |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rahkar_com |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 03:38 | 23,208 | -3 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 23,211 | +183 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 23,028 | -145 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 23,173 | -45 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 23,218 | -32 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 23,250 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 23,268 | +411 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 22,857 | +391 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 22,466 | -37 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 22,503 | +68 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 22,435 | +46 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:34 | 22,389 | +48 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:27 | 22,341 | +64 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 22,277 | -37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 22,314 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 22,325 | -21 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 22,346 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 22,366 | -31 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 22,397 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 22,417 | first reading |
267 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 99 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 267 (3 August 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 42,876 |
| Reactions total | 85 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 15:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
621 reactions across 106 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 378 | 60.9% | |
| 👍 | 155 | 25.0% | |
| 🙏 | 39 | 6.28% | |
| 👏 | 28 | 4.51% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 2.58% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 0.805% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 267 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 621 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 267 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه تمرین برای امشب دارم برات 🌙 فردا هر بار خواستی یکی از این جملهها رو بگی: «ببخشید...» «شاید اشتباه کنم...» «من خیلی بلد نیستم ولی...» «اگه گرونه میتونیم تخفیف بدیم...» 🔻فقط یه لحظه مکث کن. و از خودت بپرس: «میتونم همین حرف رو بدون کوچک کردن خودم بگم؟» همین تمرین ساده میتونه کلی چیز درباره مدل حرف زدنت بهت نشون بده‼️ و اگه میخوای این مهارت رو جدیتر یاد بگیری 👇🏻 🎙 وبینار رایگان بیان ثروتساز 📍دوشنبه ۲۰ مهر ساعت…
و دقیقاً یکی از چیزهایی که توی وبینار رایگان✨ «بیان ثروتساز» دربارهش حرف میزنیم همینه: 🔺چطور مدل حرف زدنمون رو طوری تغییر بدیم که تواناییهامون بیشتر دیده بشه، اعتماد بیشتری ایجاد کنیم و در موقعیتهای مالی محکمتر ظاهر بشیم. اگر تو هم حس میکنی خیلی وقتها تواناییهات بیشتر از چیزیه که از حرف زدنت برداشت میشه، این وبینار رو از دست نده.🥰 📍 دوشنبه ۲۰ مهر ساعت ۱۹ 🔗 ثبتنام رایگان: https://rahkar.me/landing/wealth-t…
◾️اگر چند مورد از اینها رو داشتی، قرار نیست نتیجه بگیری: «پس من اعتمادبهنفس ندارم.» نه.❌ خیلی از این رفتارها الگوهای کلامی هستن. و الگوی کلامی قابل تغییره.✅ میشه یاد گرفت: چطور نظر بدی، چطور مخالفت کنی، چطور درخواستت رو مطرح کنی، چطور قیمت بگی، چطور ارزش کارت رو توضیح بدی، بدون اینکه مهاجم باشی و بدون اینکه خودتو کوچیک کنی🧿
📌حالا یه تست سریع برای خودت: وقتی با مشتری، مدیر، همکار یا حتی یه آدم جدید حرف میزنی... چند بار این کارها رو انجام میدی؟👇 ▫️ قبل از گفتن نظرت عذرخواهی میکنی ▫️ بیش از حد توضیح میدی ▫️ از سکوت میترسی و سریع شروع به حرف زدن میکنی ▫️ موقع اعلام قیمت لحن صدات تغییر میکنه ▫️ وقتی مخالفت میبینی سریع عقبنشینی میکنی ▫️ برای اینکه طرف مقابل ناراحت نشه، حرف اصلیت رو نرم و مبهم میکنی اگه ۳ مورد یا بیشتر رو داری... پست بعدی…
یکی دیگه 👇🏻 ❌ «قیمت ما ۱۵ میلیونه، البته اگه براتون زیاد باشه میتونیم صحبت کنیم...» ✅ «هزینه اجرای این پروژه ۱۵ میلیون تومنه و شامل این سه بخش میشه...» 🔻فرقش چیه؟ در دومی تو داری ارزش رو توضیح میدی، نه اینکه از قیمتت دفاع کنی❗️ این تفاوت کوچیکه... ولی توی ذهن طرف مقابل اصلاً کوچیک نیست💯
حالا یه تمرین کوچیک 👇🏻 این جمله رو بخون: ❌ «من خیلی متخصص نیستم ولی فکر میکنم این روش شاید برای شما مناسبتر باشه.» حالا تبدیلش کنیم به: ✅ «با توجه به شرایطی که گفتید، پیشنهاد من اینه که از این روش استفاده کنیم.» دیدی؟ نه مغرور شد. نه ادعای عجیب کرد. فقط اضافههای ضعیفکننده حذف شد.😌
🎙 این وویس رو گوش کن ۳ مدل جملهای که ممکنه درآمدتو کم کنه🚩
👇اینجاست که یه نکته خیلی مهم داریم: خیلی وقتها مشتری ارزش کارت رو پایین نمیاره...❌ این مدل حرف زدن ماست که قبل از مشتری، ارزش کارمون رو پایین میاره📉 نه چون آدم ضعیفی هستیم❗️ نه چون اعتمادبهنفس نداریم❗️ خیلی وقتها فقط یاد نگرفتیم، چطور محکم، شفاف و بدون عذرخواهی حرف بزنیم🗣
📌یا فرض کن مشتری میپرسه: «هزینه این کار چقدره؟» و تو جواب میدی: «راستش قیمتش ۲۰ میلیونه... ولی حالا اگه زیاد باشه میتونیم یه کاریش کنیم...» هنوز مشتری هیچ اعتراضی نکرده😐 ولی تو خودت قبل از اون به قیمت خودت اعتراض کردی‼️
مشکل این جملهها فقط خود جمله نیست❌ پیامی که پشتشون منتقل میشه مهمه✅ 🔻وقتی قبل از بیان نظرت میگی: «نمیدونم درست میگم یا نه...» قبل از اینکه طرف مقابل درباره حرفت تصمیم بگیره، خودت بهش گفتی که خیلی به حرف من اعتماد نکن!🫤
مثلاً تا حالا یکی از این جملهها رو گفتی؟ 👇🏻 «حالا من خیلی متخصص نیستم ولی...» «نمیدونم درست میگم یا نه...» «ببخشید یه چیزی بگم...» «البته نظر من خیلی مهم نیست...» «قیمت اصلیش اینه، ولی حالا میتونیم یه تخفیفی بدیم...» 😬 اگه حداقل یکیش برات آشناست، این پست رو لایک کن❤️ چون امروز دقیقاً میخوام درباره همین حرف بزنیم😌
یه چیزی رو امروز میخوام باهم چک کنیم 👀 🔺ممکنه تو واقعاً آدم توانمندی باشی... تخصص داشته باشی، تجربه داشته باشی، کارت هم خوب باشه... 🔻ولی وقتی حرف میزنی، ناخواسته خودتو کمتر از چیزی که هستی نشون بدی‼️
Showing the 12 most recent of 267 posts we hold for @rahkar_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@rahkar_com edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
در گفتگو برای شما بیشتر کدوم اتفاق میفته؟
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
وقتی کلمه «آدم جرأتمند» رو میشنوی، اولین تصویری که توی ذهنت شکل میگیره چیه؟
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگه بخوای همین الان به فن بیان خودت از ۱ تا ۵ نمره بدی چه عددی میدی؟
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
به نظرت کدوم یکی از این ۵ اشتباه بیشتر از همه باعث میشه قدرت و تأثیرگذاری کلامت پایین بیاد؟
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
معمولا تو جمعهای فامیلی، دوستانه و کاری جزو کدوم دستهای؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اگر یک نفر توی جمع بهت تیکه بندازه عکس العملت چیه؟
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 267 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“طاها بامشاد | مربی فنبیان و ارتباطات” (@rahkar_com), 23,208 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahkar_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.